A putative placebo analysis of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure across the full range of ejection fraction.
Placebo
Sacubitril/valsartan
Statistics
Trials
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
25
01
2020
revised:
07
02
2020
accepted:
27
03
2020
pubmed:
30
3
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
30
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials tested sacubitril/valsartan against active controls given renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) are ethically mandated in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and are used in the vast majority of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. To estimate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan had it been tested against a placebo control, we made indirect comparisons of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan with putative placebos in HF across the full range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analysed patient-level data from the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials (n = 13 194) and the CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Preserved trials (n = 5050, candesartan vs. placebo). The rate ratio (RR) of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was estimated by the product of the RR for sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi and the RR for RASi vs. placebo. Total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death were analysed using the negative binomial method. Treatment effects were estimated using cubic spline methods by ejection fraction as a continuous measure. Across the range of LVEF, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a RR 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.65] for the recurrent primary endpoint compared with putative placebo (P < 0.001). Treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo varied non-linearly with LVEF with attenuation of effects observed at LVEF above 60%. When analyzing data from PARADIGM-HF and CHARM-Alternative, the estimated risk reduction of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was 48% (95% CI 35-58%); P < 0.001. When analyzing data from PARAGON-HF and CHARM-Preserved (with LVEF ≥ 45%), the estimated risk reduction of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was 29% (95% CI 7-46%); P = 0.013. Across the full range of LVEF, consistent effects were observed for time-to-first endpoints: first primary endpoint (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.82), first HF hospitalization (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.78), cardiovascular death (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89), and all-cause death (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96); all P < 0.02. This putative placebo analysis reinforces the treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan on risk of adverse cardiovascular events across the full range of LVEF, with most pronounced effects observed at a LVEF up to 60%.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32221596
pii: 5813082
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa184
pmc: PMC7327532
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminobutyrates
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Biphenyl Compounds
0
Drug Combinations
0
Tetrazoles
0
Valsartan
80M03YXJ7I
sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
WB8FT61183
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2356-2362Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002541
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):434-9
pubmed: 25416329
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 30;22(6):941-52
pubmed: 12627411
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 1;325(5):293-302
pubmed: 2057034
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620
pubmed: 31475794
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1476-1488
pubmed: 27216111
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239
pubmed: 23747642
Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):777-81
pubmed: 13678871
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351
pubmed: 31736337
Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):772-6
pubmed: 13678870
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361
pubmed: 31736342
Am Heart J. 2001 Jan;141(1):26-32
pubmed: 11136483
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2456-67
pubmed: 19001508
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86
pubmed: 10854085