A putative placebo analysis of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure across the full range of ejection fraction.


Journal

European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2020
Historique:
received: 25 01 2020
revised: 07 02 2020
accepted: 27 03 2020
pubmed: 30 3 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 30 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials tested sacubitril/valsartan against active controls given renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) are ethically mandated in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and are used in the vast majority of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. To estimate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan had it been tested against a placebo control, we made indirect comparisons of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan with putative placebos in HF across the full range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analysed patient-level data from the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials (n = 13 194) and the CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Preserved trials (n = 5050, candesartan vs. placebo). The rate ratio (RR) of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was estimated by the product of the RR for sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi and the RR for RASi vs. placebo. Total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death were analysed using the negative binomial method. Treatment effects were estimated using cubic spline methods by ejection fraction as a continuous measure. Across the range of LVEF, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a RR 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.65] for the recurrent primary endpoint compared with putative placebo (P < 0.001). Treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo varied non-linearly with LVEF with attenuation of effects observed at LVEF above 60%. When analyzing data from PARADIGM-HF and CHARM-Alternative, the estimated risk reduction of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was 48% (95% CI 35-58%); P < 0.001. When analyzing data from PARAGON-HF and CHARM-Preserved (with LVEF ≥ 45%), the estimated risk reduction of sacubitril/valsartan vs. putative placebo was 29% (95% CI 7-46%); P = 0.013. Across the full range of LVEF, consistent effects were observed for time-to-first endpoints: first primary endpoint (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.82), first HF hospitalization (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.78), cardiovascular death (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89), and all-cause death (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96); all P < 0.02. This putative placebo analysis reinforces the treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan on risk of adverse cardiovascular events across the full range of LVEF, with most pronounced effects observed at a LVEF up to 60%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32221596
pii: 5813082
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa184
pmc: PMC7327532
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aminobutyrates 0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists 0
Biphenyl Compounds 0
Drug Combinations 0
Tetrazoles 0
Valsartan 80M03YXJ7I
sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination WB8FT61183

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2356-2362

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002541
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Références

Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):434-9
pubmed: 25416329
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 30;22(6):941-52
pubmed: 12627411
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 1;325(5):293-302
pubmed: 2057034
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620
pubmed: 31475794
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1476-1488
pubmed: 27216111
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239
pubmed: 23747642
Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):777-81
pubmed: 13678871
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351
pubmed: 31736337
Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):772-6
pubmed: 13678870
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361
pubmed: 31736342
Am Heart J. 2001 Jan;141(1):26-32
pubmed: 11136483
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2456-67
pubmed: 19001508
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86
pubmed: 10854085

Auteurs

Muthiah Vaduganathan (M)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Pardeep S Jhund (PS)

British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.

Brian L Claggett (BL)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Milton Packer (M)

Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Royal Brompton Hospital, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK.

Jiri Widimský (J)

Department of Medicine III, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Katerinská 32, CZ-121 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Petar Seferovic (P)

Heart Failure Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 8 Koste Todorovića, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.

Adel Rizkala (A)

Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA.

Martin Lefkowitz (M)

Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA.

Victor Shi (V)

Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA.

John J V McMurray (JJV)

British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.

Scott D Solomon (SD)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH