Oral Azacitidine and Cedazuridine Approximate Parenteral Azacitidine Efficacy in Murine Model.
Journal
Targeted oncology
ISSN: 1776-260X
Titre abrégé: Target Oncol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101270595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
31
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) improve survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unable to receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and are, accordingly, the backbone of standard-of-care treatment for these conditions. Standard regimens with DNMTIs, decitabine (DEC) or azacitidine (AZA) include daily subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration for 5-7 consecutive days. Attempts to provide the therapy orally have been limited given rapid clearance of the agents by the enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDA), which is ubiquitous in the gut and liver as part of first-pass metabolism. Recently, cedazuridine (CDZ), an oral inhibitor of CDA, was successfully combined with DEC to approximate the pharmacokinetics of i.v. DEC in patients. To determine if an oral dosing strategy might be feasible in the clinic with AZA, we attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral AZA through the use of CDZ, in a murine model. Following pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of oral AZA dosed with CDZ in murine and monkey models, we tested this regimen in vivo with a human cell line-derived xenograft transplantation experiment (CDX). Following this we combined the regimen with venetoclax (VEN) to test the efficacy of an all-oral regimen in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. Parenteral AZA and oral AZA + CDZ exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles, and efficacy against human AML cells. Tumor regression was seen with AZA + CDZ in MOLM-13 CDX and PDX models. We conclude that oral AZA when combined with CDZ achieves successful tumor regression in both CDX and PDX models. Furthermore, the combination of AZA + CDZ with VEN in a PDX model emulated responses seen with VEN + AZA in the clinic, implying a potential all-oral VEN-based therapy opportunity in myeloid diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) improve survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unable to receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and are, accordingly, the backbone of standard-of-care treatment for these conditions. Standard regimens with DNMTIs, decitabine (DEC) or azacitidine (AZA) include daily subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration for 5-7 consecutive days. Attempts to provide the therapy orally have been limited given rapid clearance of the agents by the enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDA), which is ubiquitous in the gut and liver as part of first-pass metabolism. Recently, cedazuridine (CDZ), an oral inhibitor of CDA, was successfully combined with DEC to approximate the pharmacokinetics of i.v. DEC in patients.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if an oral dosing strategy might be feasible in the clinic with AZA, we attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral AZA through the use of CDZ, in a murine model.
METHODS
Following pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of oral AZA dosed with CDZ in murine and monkey models, we tested this regimen in vivo with a human cell line-derived xenograft transplantation experiment (CDX). Following this we combined the regimen with venetoclax (VEN) to test the efficacy of an all-oral regimen in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model.
RESULTS
Parenteral AZA and oral AZA + CDZ exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles, and efficacy against human AML cells. Tumor regression was seen with AZA + CDZ in MOLM-13 CDX and PDX models.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that oral AZA when combined with CDZ achieves successful tumor regression in both CDX and PDX models. Furthermore, the combination of AZA + CDZ with VEN in a PDX model emulated responses seen with VEN + AZA in the clinic, implying a potential all-oral VEN-based therapy opportunity in myeloid diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32222953
doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00709-x
pii: 10.1007/s11523-020-00709-x
pmc: PMC7182630
doi:
Substances chimiques
cedazuridine
39IS23Q1EW
Azacitidine
M801H13NRU
Uridine
WHI7HQ7H85
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
231-240Références
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Mar;10(3):223-32
pubmed: 19230772
J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 15;20(10):2429-40
pubmed: 12011120
Am J Hematol. 2018 Oct;93(10):1199-1206
pubmed: 30016552
Leuk Res. 2018 Sep;72:79-85
pubmed: 30114559
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):216-228
pubmed: 29339097
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2009 Oct;7(10):672-4
pubmed: 20040908
Manag Care. 2009 Nov;18(11 Suppl 9):25-8; discussion 28-9
pubmed: 20085114
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Nov 22;7:1201-6
pubmed: 24293991
Blood. 2019 Jan 3;133(1):7-17
pubmed: 30361262
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0135520
pubmed: 26296092
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 7;14(9):e1002382
pubmed: 28880867
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2521-7
pubmed: 21576646
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1850-6
pubmed: 19255328
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Apr;6(4):e194-e203
pubmed: 30926081
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Dec 15;119(12):1168-74
pubmed: 8239247
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 15;19(4):938-48
pubmed: 23287564
Cancer Res. 2006 May 15;66(10):5495-503
pubmed: 16707479
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Mar;85(3):621-626
pubmed: 32036412
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Oct;24(10):2017-2024
pubmed: 29933073
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1277-1284
pubmed: 30892988
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):562-9
pubmed: 20026804
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):110-5
pubmed: 8996131