Beyond Discharge Summaries: Communication Preferences in Care Transitions Between Hospitalists and Primary Care Providers Using Electronic Medical Records.
discharge communication
hospitalists
primary care providers
transitions
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
21
08
2019
accepted:
09
03
2020
pubmed:
4
4
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
4
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ineffective transitions of care continue to be a source of risk for patients. Although there has been widespread implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, little is currently known about hospitalists' and primary care providers' (PCPs) direct communication preferences at discharge using messaging capabilities in a shared EMR system. We examined how hospitalists and PCPs with a shared EMR prefer to directly communicate at the time of hospital discharge by identifying preferred modes, information prioritization, challenges, facilitators, and proposed solutions. A sequential, explanatory mixed methods study with surveys and semi-structured interviews. Thirty-eight academic hospitalists and 63 PCPs working in outpatient clinics in a single safety net hospital system with a shared EMR. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization and a mixture of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. PCPs preferred direct communication at discharge through a message within the EMR while hospitalists preferred a message within the EMR and email. Qualitative results identified key themes related to patient care and direct communication: value of direct communication, safety, social determinants of health, and clinical judgment. Both groups prioritized direct communication for high-risk medications, pending and follow-up studies, and high-risk patients that hospitalists were concerned about. Overall, both hospitalists and PCPs reported that ensuring patient safety, flagging patients with social challenges, and expressing concerns about patients based on clinical judgment were key communication priorities. Hospitalists and primary care providers report considerable overlap in preferences for direct communication at the time of hospital discharge through a shared EMR. Specifically, both groups reported similar concerns regarding patient safety and continuity during transitions. Direct messaging within the EMR could enable "closed loop" communication that helps ensure safe transitions of care for high-risk patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ineffective transitions of care continue to be a source of risk for patients. Although there has been widespread implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, little is currently known about hospitalists' and primary care providers' (PCPs) direct communication preferences at discharge using messaging capabilities in a shared EMR system.
OBJECTIVE
We examined how hospitalists and PCPs with a shared EMR prefer to directly communicate at the time of hospital discharge by identifying preferred modes, information prioritization, challenges, facilitators, and proposed solutions.
DESIGN
A sequential, explanatory mixed methods study with surveys and semi-structured interviews.
PARTICIPANTS
Thirty-eight academic hospitalists and 63 PCPs working in outpatient clinics in a single safety net hospital system with a shared EMR.
MAIN APPROACH
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization and a mixture of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.
KEY RESULTS
PCPs preferred direct communication at discharge through a message within the EMR while hospitalists preferred a message within the EMR and email. Qualitative results identified key themes related to patient care and direct communication: value of direct communication, safety, social determinants of health, and clinical judgment. Both groups prioritized direct communication for high-risk medications, pending and follow-up studies, and high-risk patients that hospitalists were concerned about. Overall, both hospitalists and PCPs reported that ensuring patient safety, flagging patients with social challenges, and expressing concerns about patients based on clinical judgment were key communication priorities.
CONCLUSIONS
Hospitalists and primary care providers report considerable overlap in preferences for direct communication at the time of hospital discharge through a shared EMR. Specifically, both groups reported similar concerns regarding patient safety and continuity during transitions. Direct messaging within the EMR could enable "closed loop" communication that helps ensure safe transitions of care for high-risk patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32242311
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05786-2
pii: 10.1007/s11606-020-05786-2
pmc: PMC7280409
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1789-1796Références
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):417-28
pubmed: 22986379
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):177-85
pubmed: 20033621
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;32(3):13-9
pubmed: 23335297
J Hosp Med. 2006 Nov;1(6):354-60
pubmed: 17219528
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;15(1):61-8
pubmed: 25444655
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):419-426
pubmed: 28893811
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):758-765
pubmed: 29180550
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41
pubmed: 17327525
J Ambul Care Manage. 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):80-86
pubmed: 28350636
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):381-6
pubmed: 19101774
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):e25-e33
pubmed: 26741789
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Hosp Med. 2009 Mar;4(3):187-93
pubmed: 19263485
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 6;165(11):753-760
pubmed: 27595430
J Hosp Med. 2013 Oct;8(10):589-97
pubmed: 24101544
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):376-81
pubmed: 22378723
J Hosp Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(6):323-8
pubmed: 20803669
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jun;347(6):472-7
pubmed: 24845304
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):307-10
pubmed: 25755159
Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S5-8
pubmed: 17001135
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;61(4):671-9
pubmed: 25084716
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1164-71
pubmed: 25822112
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Jul;16(5):453-459
pubmed: 26979780
J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr;4(4):219-25
pubmed: 19267397
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):624-9
pubmed: 23529278
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;43(3):127-137
pubmed: 28334591
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):417-24
pubmed: 25316586
Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):734-9
pubmed: 20876170
Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):855-66
pubmed: 12109729
J Hosp Med. 2009 Jul;4(6):364-70
pubmed: 19479781