Artificial neural networks in neurorehabilitation: A scoping review.
Neural networks
nervous system diseases
neurological rehabilitation
rehabilitation
Journal
NeuroRehabilitation
ISSN: 1878-6448
Titre abrégé: NeuroRehabilitation
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9113791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
10
10
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advances in medical technology produce highly complex datasets in neurorehabilitation clinics and research laboratories. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been utilized to analyze big and complex datasets in various fields, but the use of ANNs in neurorehabilitation is limited. To explore the current use of ANNs in neurorehabilitation. PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were used for the literature search. Studies in the scoping review (1) utilized ANNs, (2) examined populations with neurological conditions, and (3) focused on rehabilitation outcomes. The initial search identified 1,136 articles. A total of 19 articles were included. ANNs were used for prediction of functional outcomes and mortality (n = 11) and classification of motor symptoms and cognitive status (n = 8). Most ANN-based models outperformed regression or other machine learning models (n = 11) and showed accurate performance (n = 6; no comparison with other models) in predicting clinical outcomes and accurately classifying different neurological impairments. This scoping review provides encouraging evidence to use ANNs for clinical decision-making of complex datasets in neurorehabilitation. However, more research is needed to establish the clinical utility of ANNs in diagnosing, monitoring, and rehabilitation of individuals with neurological conditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Advances in medical technology produce highly complex datasets in neurorehabilitation clinics and research laboratories. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been utilized to analyze big and complex datasets in various fields, but the use of ANNs in neurorehabilitation is limited.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To explore the current use of ANNs in neurorehabilitation.
METHODS
METHODS
PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were used for the literature search. Studies in the scoping review (1) utilized ANNs, (2) examined populations with neurological conditions, and (3) focused on rehabilitation outcomes. The initial search identified 1,136 articles. A total of 19 articles were included.
RESULTS
RESULTS
ANNs were used for prediction of functional outcomes and mortality (n = 11) and classification of motor symptoms and cognitive status (n = 8). Most ANN-based models outperformed regression or other machine learning models (n = 11) and showed accurate performance (n = 6; no comparison with other models) in predicting clinical outcomes and accurately classifying different neurological impairments.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This scoping review provides encouraging evidence to use ANNs for clinical decision-making of complex datasets in neurorehabilitation. However, more research is needed to establish the clinical utility of ANNs in diagnosing, monitoring, and rehabilitation of individuals with neurological conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32250332
pii: NRE192996
doi: 10.3233/NRE-192996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM