Discovery of hierarchical representations for efficient planning.
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
22
07
2019
accepted:
10
12
2019
revised:
16
04
2020
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We propose that humans spontaneously organize environments into clusters of states that support hierarchical planning, enabling them to tackle challenging problems by breaking them down into sub-problems at various levels of abstraction. People constantly rely on such hierarchical presentations to accomplish tasks big and small-from planning one's day, to organizing a wedding, to getting a PhD-often succeeding on the very first attempt. We formalize a Bayesian model of hierarchy discovery that explains how humans discover such useful abstractions. Building on principles developed in structure learning and robotics, the model predicts that hierarchy discovery should be sensitive to the topological structure, reward distribution, and distribution of tasks in the environment. In five simulations, we show that the model accounts for previously reported effects of environment structure on planning behavior, such as detection of bottleneck states and transitions. We then test the novel predictions of the model in eight behavioral experiments, demonstrating how the distribution of tasks and rewards can influence planning behavior via the discovered hierarchy, sometimes facilitating and sometimes hindering performance. We find evidence that the hierarchy discovery process unfolds incrementally across trials. Finally, we propose how hierarchy discovery and hierarchical planning might be implemented in the brain. Together, these findings present an important advance in our understanding of how the brain might use Bayesian inference to discover and exploit the hidden hierarchical structure of the environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251444
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007594
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-19-01104
pmc: PMC7162548
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1007594Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH109177
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):680-692
pubmed: 31024137
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(3):e1002410
pubmed: 22412360
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1036-51
pubmed: 22487034
Cogn Sci. 2008 Jan 2;32(1):108-54
pubmed: 21635333
Neural Comput. 2012 Jan;24(1):1-24
pubmed: 22023198
Cell. 2018 Jun 28;174(1):32-43.e15
pubmed: 29958111
Neuropharmacology. 1998 Apr-May;37(4-5):407-19
pubmed: 9704982
Neural Comput. 2002 Jun;14(6):1347-69
pubmed: 12020450
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):529-33
pubmed: 25719670
Neural Comput. 1995 Sep;7(5):889-904
pubmed: 7584891
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):513-23
pubmed: 16045504
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):915-924
pubmed: 30988442
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jan;19(1):181-9
pubmed: 14750976
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):361-74
pubmed: 23810540
Neuron. 2016 May 18;90(4):893-903
pubmed: 27196978
Physiol Behav. 2005 Dec 15;86(5):717-30
pubmed: 16257019
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97
pubmed: 13310704
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):599-637
pubmed: 24467492
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 6;12(7):e0180234
pubmed: 28683111
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726
pubmed: 11301544
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Nov;20(11):1643-1653
pubmed: 28967910
Neuron. 2011 Jul 28;71(2):370-9
pubmed: 21791294
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 14;10(8):e1003779
pubmed: 25122479
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;16(2):80-84
pubmed: 22468032
Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208
pubmed: 18870876
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 5;369(1655):
pubmed: 25267822
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):287-91
pubmed: 16807064
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1321-1333
pubmed: 28731839
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
pubmed: 11515286
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 10;112(10):3098-103
pubmed: 25675480
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998 Jul-Sep;70(1-2):119-36
pubmed: 9753592
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):285-300
pubmed: 23200511
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Aug;96:1-25
pubmed: 28586634
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Apr;16(4):486-92
pubmed: 23416451
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11
pubmed: 16286932
Cognition. 2009 Dec;113(3):262-280
pubmed: 18926527
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):190-229
pubmed: 23356780
IJCAI (U S). 2016 Jul;2016:1648-1654
pubmed: 28579718
Psychol Rev. 2015 Jan;122(1):54-83
pubmed: 25437491
Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
pubmed: 9054347
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Dec;20(12):883-893
pubmed: 28327290
Neuron. 2013 Oct 16;80(2):312-25
pubmed: 24139036