Postglacial migration shaped the genomic diversity and global distribution of the wild ancestor of lager-brewing hybrids.


Journal

PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 08 08 2019
accepted: 18 02 2020
revised: 16 04 2020
pubmed: 7 4 2020
medline: 4 8 2020
entrez: 7 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The wild, cold-adapted parent of hybrid lager-brewing yeasts, Saccharomyces eubayanus, has a complex and understudied natural history. The exploration of this diversity can be used both to develop new brewing applications and to enlighten our understanding of the dynamics of yeast evolution in the wild. Here, we integrate whole genome sequence and phenotypic data of 200 S. eubayanus strains, the largest collection known to date. S. eubayanus has a multilayered population structure, consisting of two major populations that are further structured into six subpopulations. Four of these subpopulations are found exclusively in the Patagonian region of South America; one is found predominantly in Patagonia and sparsely in Oceania and North America; and one is specific to the Holarctic ecozone. Plant host associations differed between subpopulations and between S. eubayanus and its sister species, Saccharomyces uvarum. S. eubayanus is most abundant and genetically diverse in northern Patagonia, where some locations harbor more genetic diversity than is found outside of South America, suggesting that northern Patagonia east of the Andes was a glacial refugium for this species. All but one subpopulation shows isolation-by-distance, and gene flow between subpopulations is low. However, there are strong signals of ancient and recent outcrossing, including two admixed lineages, one that is sympatric with and one that is mostly isolated from its parental populations. Using our extensive biogeographical data, we build a robust model that predicts all known and a handful of additional regions of the globe that are climatically suitable for S. eubayanus, including Europe where host accessibility and competitive exclusion by other Saccharomyces species may explain its continued elusiveness. We conclude that this industrially relevant species has rich natural diversity with many factors contributing to its complex distribution and natural history.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32251477
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008680
pii: PGENETICS-D-19-01338
pmc: PMC7162524
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1008680

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007133
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

We have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: commercial use of Saccharomyces eubayanus strains requires a license from WARF or CONICET. Strains are available for academic research under a material transfer agreement.

Références

Yeast. 2014 Dec;31(12):449-62
pubmed: 25242436
Trends Genet. 2013 May;29(5):309-17
pubmed: 23395329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 14;109(33):13398-403
pubmed: 22847440
Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 6;17(5):407-11
pubmed: 17306538
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(12):e1003080
pubmed: 23284287
Nature. 2017 Jan 18;541(7637):302-310
pubmed: 28102248
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7701):339-344
pubmed: 29643504
Microbiology. 2018 Sep;164(9):1069-1071
pubmed: 30175956
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Jan 11;1:15003
pubmed: 27571751
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;8(4):755-8
pubmed: 16584487
FEMS Yeast Res. 2017 Mar 1;17(2):
pubmed: 28334169
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):5044-9
pubmed: 16151085
Nature. 2009 Mar 19;458(7236):342-5
pubmed: 19212320
FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 Sep;14(6):948-65
pubmed: 25041507
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jan 27;6(4):1236-50
pubmed: 26941949
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Apr;18(4):1137-47
pubmed: 26522264
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Oct;18(10):581-598
pubmed: 28714481
Mol Ecol. 2010 Jan;19(2):371-85
pubmed: 20002584
Environ Microbiol. 2018 Oct;20(10):3732-3743
pubmed: 30105823
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 08;281(1777):20132472
pubmed: 24403328
Biotechniques. 2007 Jan;42(1):71-5
pubmed: 17269487
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 25;10(1):923
pubmed: 30804385
FEMS Yeast Res. 2015 May;15(3):
pubmed: 25743785
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2019 Apr;11(2):206-214
pubmed: 30507071
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;27(1):47-56
pubmed: 22014977
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):254-67
pubmed: 16221896
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jun;16(6):359-71
pubmed: 25963373
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012 Feb;4(1):105-12
pubmed: 23757236
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;49:199-206
pubmed: 29102814
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14539-44
pubmed: 21873232
Bioinformatics. 2019 May 15;35(10):1786-1788
pubmed: 30321304
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Nov;32(11):2818-31
pubmed: 26269586
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Aug 30;8(9):2967-2977
pubmed: 30097472
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 02;5:4044
pubmed: 24887054
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 May;34(5):400-415
pubmed: 30824193
Mol Ecol. 2012 Nov;21(22):5404-17
pubmed: 22913817
Nature. 2009 Mar 19;458(7236):337-41
pubmed: 19212322
PLoS Genet. 2012 Jan;8(1):e1002453
pubmed: 22291602
Yeast. 2013 Jul;30(7):255-66
pubmed: 23695993
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 Sep;14(6):910-21
pubmed: 24981278
Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):573-89
pubmed: 24700103
PLoS Genet. 2016 Jul 06;12(7):e1006155
pubmed: 27385107
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 30;5(1):eaav1869
pubmed: 30729163
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1540-2
pubmed: 16595560
Cell. 2016 Sep 8;166(6):1397-1410.e16
pubmed: 27610566
Mol Ecol. 2014 Apr;23(8):2031-45
pubmed: 24612382
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov;3(11):1562-1575
pubmed: 31636425
Cell. 2018 Nov 29;175(6):1533-1545.e20
pubmed: 30415838
Yeast. 2015 Jan;32(1):17-27
pubmed: 25088523
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov;3(11):1576-1586
pubmed: 31636426
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 24;26(20):2750-2761
pubmed: 27720622
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):261-75
pubmed: 21883239
Curr Biol. 2014 May 19;24(10):R380-1
pubmed: 24845661

Auteurs

Quinn K Langdon (QK)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

David Peris (D)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
Department of Food Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), CSIC, Valencia, Spain.

Juan I Eizaguirre (JI)

Centro de Referencia en Levaduras y Tecnología Cervecera (CRELTEC), Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC) - CONICET / Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche, Argentina.

Dana A Opulente (DA)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

Kelly V Buh (KV)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

Kayla Sylvester (K)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

Martin Jarzyna (M)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

María E Rodríguez (ME)

Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ingeniería de Procesos, Biotecnología y Energías Alternativas (PROBIEN, CONICET-UNCo), Neuquén, Argentina.

Christian A Lopes (CA)

Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ingeniería de Procesos, Biotecnología y Energías Alternativas (PROBIEN, CONICET-UNCo), Neuquén, Argentina.

Diego Libkind (D)

Centro de Referencia en Levaduras y Tecnología Cervecera (CRELTEC), Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC) - CONICET / Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche, Argentina.

Chris Todd Hittinger (CT)

Laboratory of Genetics, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, Wisconsin Energy Institute, Center for Genomic Science Innovation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals

Classifications MeSH