Long-term impact of preventive UDCA therapy after transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis.
Aged
Cholagogues and Choleretics
/ administration & dosage
Cyclosporine
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Graft Rejection
/ mortality
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary
/ etiology
Liver Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Ursodeoxycholic Acid
/ administration & dosage
Cyclosporine
PBC
Recurrence
Survival
Tacrolimus
Transplantation
UDCA
Journal
Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
19
12
2019
revised:
06
03
2020
accepted:
23
03
2020
pubmed:
11
4
2020
medline:
9
11
2021
entrez:
11
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the current standard therapy for PBC. We investigated the effect of preventive exposure to UDCA on the incidence and long-term consequences of PBC recurrence after LT. We performed a retrospective cohort study in 780 patients transplanted for PBC, between 1983-2017 in 16 centers (9 countries), and followed-up for a median of 11 years. Among them, 190 received preventive UDCA (10-15 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was histological evidence of PBC recurrence. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, liver-related death, and all-cause death. The association between preventive UDCA and outcomes was quantified using multivariable-adjusted Cox and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models. While recurrence of PBC significantly shortened graft and patient survival, preventive exposure to UDCA was associated with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.41; 95% CI 0.28-0.61; p <0.0001), graft loss (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; p <0.05), liver-related death (aHR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.98; p <0.05), and all-cause death (aHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.96; p <0.05). On RMST analysis, preventive UDCA led to a survival gain of 2.26 years (95% CI 1.28-3.25) over a period of 20 years. Exposure to cyclosporine rather than tacrolimus had a complementary protective effect alongside preventive UDCA, reducing the cumulative incidence of PBC recurrence and all-cause death. Preventive UDCA after LT for PBC is associated with a reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, and death. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive UDCA is associated with the lowest risk of PBC recurrence and mortality. Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. We performed the largest international study of transplanted patients with primary biliary cholangitis to date. Preventive administration of ursodeoxycholic acid after liver transplantation was associated with reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with the best outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the current standard therapy for PBC. We investigated the effect of preventive exposure to UDCA on the incidence and long-term consequences of PBC recurrence after LT.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study in 780 patients transplanted for PBC, between 1983-2017 in 16 centers (9 countries), and followed-up for a median of 11 years. Among them, 190 received preventive UDCA (10-15 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was histological evidence of PBC recurrence. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, liver-related death, and all-cause death. The association between preventive UDCA and outcomes was quantified using multivariable-adjusted Cox and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models.
RESULTS
While recurrence of PBC significantly shortened graft and patient survival, preventive exposure to UDCA was associated with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.41; 95% CI 0.28-0.61; p <0.0001), graft loss (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; p <0.05), liver-related death (aHR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.98; p <0.05), and all-cause death (aHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.96; p <0.05). On RMST analysis, preventive UDCA led to a survival gain of 2.26 years (95% CI 1.28-3.25) over a period of 20 years. Exposure to cyclosporine rather than tacrolimus had a complementary protective effect alongside preventive UDCA, reducing the cumulative incidence of PBC recurrence and all-cause death.
CONCLUSIONS
Preventive UDCA after LT for PBC is associated with a reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, and death. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive UDCA is associated with the lowest risk of PBC recurrence and mortality.
LAY SUMMARY
Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. We performed the largest international study of transplanted patients with primary biliary cholangitis to date. Preventive administration of ursodeoxycholic acid after liver transplantation was associated with reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with the best outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32275981
pii: S0168-8278(20)30205-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.043
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholagogues and Choleretics
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Ursodeoxycholic Acid
724L30Y2QR
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
559-565Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest Dr. Corpechot reports receiving grants from Arrow and Intercept France, consulting fees from Intercept France, Inventiva Pharma and Genkyotex, and fees for teaching from Intercept France and GlaxoSmithKline France; Dr. Chazouillères, receiving grant support from Aptalis, fees for teaching from Mayoly Spindler, consulting fees from Genfit, and fees for teaching and consulting fees from Intercept; Dr. Schramm, receiving lecture fees from Falk Pharma; Dr. Reuken, receiving lecture fees from CSL Behring, consulting fees from Boston Scientific, and travel expenses from Merz Pharmaceuticals; Dr. Rauchfuss, receiving lecture fees from Chiesi, Novartis, Roche and Astellas; Dr. Verhelst, receiving travel grants from Falk Pharma; Dr. Bruns, receiving lecture fees from AbbVie, Norgine, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Falk Pharma, and consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals; Dr. Cazzagon receiving consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.