Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices.
Drilling speed
Lithotripsy
PCNL
Stone clearance
Stone fragmentation
Stone treatment
Technology
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
25
03
2020
pubmed:
12
4
2020
medline:
23
7
2021
entrez:
12
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the fragmentation capacity, clearance time, and drilling speed of combined ultrasonic with impact dual-energy and single energy ultrasonic lithotripter devices. Stone fragmentation and clearance tests were performed under direct view in an underwater layered hemisphere by four different operators using artificial stones (n = 10/operator). Time for complete clearance was measured. Drilling tests were performed using an underwater setup, consisting of a mounting rack for fixing the lithotripter handpiece with the probe in vertical position and in contact with the stone phantom placed on one side of a balance for defined and constant contact application pressure equivalent to 450 g load. Time until complete perforation or in case of no perforation, the penetration depth after 60 s into the stone sample was recorded. Four devices, one single energy device (SED), one dual-energy dual probe (DEDP), two dual-energy single probe (DESP-1, DESP-2), with different parameters were tested. Stone fragmentation and clearance speed were significantly faster for dual-energy device DESP-1 compared to all other devices (p < 0.001). Using DESP-1, the clearance time needed was 26.0 ± 5.0 s followed by DESP-2, SED and DEDP requiring 38.4 ± 5.8 s, 40.1 ± 6.3 s and 46.3 ± 11.6 s, respectively. Regarding the drilling speed, DESP-1 was faster compared to all other devices used (p < 0.05). While the drilling speed of DESP-1 was 0.69 ± 0.19 mm/s, compared to 0.49 ± 0.18 mm/s of DESP-2, 0.47 ± 0.09 mm/s of DEDP, and 0.19 ± 0.03 mm/s of SED. The dual-energy/single-probe device combining ultrasonic vibrations with electromechanical impact was significantly faster in fragmentation and clearing stone phantoms as well as in drilling speed compared to all other devices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32277277
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03184-1
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03184-1
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
563-569Investigateurs
Markus J Bader
(MJ)
Frank Strittmatter
(F)
Udo Nagele
(U)
Références
Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
pubmed: 26344917
Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B, Humphreys M, Knudsen B, Krambeck A, Lange D, Lipkin M, Miller NL, Monga M (2018) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a review of dusting vs fragmentation with extraction. J Endourol 32(1):1–6
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0641
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Turk C, Wolf JS (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178(6):2418–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
pubmed: 17993340
Carlos EC, Wollin DA, Winship BB, Jiang R, Radvak D, Chew BH, Gustafson MR, Simmons WN, Zhong P, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2018) In vitro comparison of a novel single probe dual-energy lithotripter to current devices. J Endourol 32(6):534–540. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0143
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0143
pubmed: 29649900
Olbert P, Weber J, Hegele A, Varga Z, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R (2003) Combining lithoclast and ultrasound power in one device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: in vitro results of a novel and highly effective technology. Urology 61(1):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02256-2 (discussion 59)
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02256-2
pubmed: 12559264
Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0895
pubmed: 28095709
Chew BH, Matteliano AA, de Los RT, Lipkin ME, Paterson RF, Lange D (2017) Benchtop and initial clinical evaluation of the ShockPulse stone eliminator in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 31(2):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0664
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0664
pubmed: 27863458
Bader MJ, Pongratz T, Khoder W, Stief CG, Herrmann T, Nagele U, Sroka R (2015) Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance. World J Urol 33(4):471–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1429-8
doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1429-8
pubmed: 25366882
Sroka R, Pongratz T, Scheib G, Khoder W, Stief CG, Herrmann T, Nagele U, Bader MJ (2015) Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level. World J Urol 33(4):479–485
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1504-9
Tokas T, Herrmann TRW, Skolarikos A, Nagele U (2019) Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol 37(1):125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4
pubmed: 29915945
Strittmatter F, Eisel M, Brinkmann R, Cordes J, Lange B, Sroka R (2020) Laser-induced lithotripsy: a review, insight into laboratory work, and lessons learned. Transl Biophoton. https://doi.org/10.1002/tbio.201900029
doi: 10.1002/tbio.201900029
Auge BK, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Zhong P, Preminger GM (2002) In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Urology 60(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01624-2
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01624-2
pubmed: 12100916
Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Zhong P, Preminger GM (2003) Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite. J Urol 169(4):1247–1249. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000049643.18775.65
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049643.18775.65
pubmed: 12629336
Esch E, Simmons WN, Sankin G, Cocks HF, Preminger GM, Zhong P (2010) A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties. Urol Res 38(4):315–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0298-x
doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0298-x
pubmed: 20652562
pmcid: 3752343
Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Siqueira TM Jr, Evan AP, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Lingeman JE (2004) In vitro assessment of lithoclast ultra intracorporeal lithotripter. J Endourol 18(2):153–156. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277904322959789
doi: 10.1089/089277904322959789
pubmed: 15072622
Haupt G, Sabrodina N, Orlovski M, Haupt A, Krupin V, Engelmann U (2001) Endoscopic lithotripsy with a new device combining ultrasound and lithoclast. J Endourol 15(9):929–935. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277901753284161
doi: 10.1089/089277901753284161
pubmed: 11769849
Louie MK, Lowe G, Knudsen BE (2008) Comparison of the lithoclast ultra and cyberwand in a cystolitholapaxy model. In: Proceedings volume 6842, photonic therapeutics and diagnostics IV; 684215. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.762891
Krambeck AE, Miller NL, Humphreys MR, Nakada SY, Denstedt JD, Razvi H, Preminger GM, Nadler RB, Matlaga BR, Paterson RF, Chew BH, Munch LC, Handa SE, Lingeman JE (2011) Randomized controlled, multicentre clinical trial comparing a dual-probe ultrasonic lithotrite with a single-probe lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 107(5):824–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09567.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09567.x
pubmed: 21355982
Khoder W, Strittmatter F, Alghamdi A, Seitz M, Stief C, Bader MJ (2019) Comparative evaluation of tissue damage induced by ultrasound and impact dual-mode endoscopic lithotripsy versus conventional single-mode ultrasound lithotripsy. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02747-1
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02747-1
pubmed: 31144092
Sabnis RB, Balaji SS, Sonawane PL, Sharma R, Vijayakumar M, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Desai MR (2019) EMS lithoclast trilogy: an effective single-probe dual-energy lithotripter for mini and standard PCNL. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02843-2
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02843-2
pubmed: 31489478
Nottingham CU, Large T, Cobb K, Sur RL, Canvasser NE, Stoughton CL, Krambeck AE (2019) Initial clinical experience with Swiss LithoClast trilogy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0561
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0561
pubmed: 31588790
York NE, Borofsky MS, Chew BH, Dauw CA, Paterson RF, Denstedt JD, Razvi H, Nadler RB, Humphreys MR, Preminger GM, Nakada SY, Krambeck AE, Miller NL, Terry C, Rawlings LD, Lingeman JE (2017) Randomized controlled trial comparing three different modalities of lithotrites for intracorporeal lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (2017). J Endourol 31(11):1145–1151. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0436
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0436
pubmed: 28859485