Sequence analysis of digestion-resistant peptides may be an efficient strategy for studying the linear epitopes of Jug r 1, the major walnut allergen.
Bioinformatics analysis
Digestion-resistant peptides
Jug r 1
Linear epitopes
Overlapping peptide synthesis
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Aug 2020
30 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
13
08
2019
revised:
27
03
2020
accepted:
29
03
2020
pubmed:
14
4
2020
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Jug r 1, the major allergen of walnut, triggers severe allergic reactions through epitopes. Hence, research on the efficient strategy for analyzing the linear epitopes of Jug r 1 are necessary. In this work, bioinformatics analysis was used to predict the linear epitopes of Jug r 1. Overlapping peptide synthesis was used to map linear epitopes. In vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion and HPLC-MS/MS were used to identify digestion-resistant peptides. The results showed that six predicted linear epitopes were AA28-35, AA42-49, AA55-62, AA65-73, AA97-104, and AA109-121. AA16-30 and AA125-139 were identified by the sera of walnut allergic patients. Five digestion-resistant peptides were AA19-33, AA40-45, AA54-74, AA96-106, and AA117-137. The predicted results only included one of the linear epitopes identified by sera, while the digestion-resistant peptides covered all. Therefore, the digestion-resistant property of food allergens may be a promising direction for studying the linear epitopes of Jug r 1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32283362
pii: S0308-8146(20)30573-2
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126711
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Epitopes
0
Peptides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126711Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.