Treatment and outcome of 370 cases with spontaneous or post-laser twin anemia-polycythemia sequence managed in 17 fetal therapy centers.
Adult
Anemia
/ complications
Blood Transfusion, Intrauterine
Cohort Studies
Female
Fetofetal Transfusion
/ complications
Gestational Age
Global Health
Humans
Polycythemia
/ complications
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Twin
Prenatal Care
Registries
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
TAPS
expectant management
intrauterine transfusion
laser surgery
monochorionic twins
selective feticide
treatment
twin anemia-polycythemia sequence
Journal
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN: 1469-0705
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9108340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2019
revised:
23
03
2020
accepted:
25
03
2020
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
8
9
2021
entrez:
16
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the antenatal management and outcome in a large international cohort of monochorionic twin pregnancies with spontaneous or post-laser twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). This study analyzed data of monochorionic twin pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with spontaneous or post-laser TAPS in 17 fetal therapy centers, recorded in the TAPS Registry between 2014 and 2019. Antenatal diagnosis of TAPS was based on fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity > 1.5 multiples of the median (MoM) in the TAPS donor and < 1.0 MoM in the TAPS recipient. The following antenatal management groups were defined: expectant management, delivery within 7 days after diagnosis, intrauterine transfusion (IUT) (with or without partial exchange transfusion (PET)), laser surgery and selective feticide. Cases were assigned to the management groups based on the first treatment that was received after diagnosis of TAPS. The primary outcomes were perinatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. The secondary outcome was diagnosis-to-birth interval. In total, 370 monochorionic twin pregnancies were diagnosed antenatally with TAPS during the study period and included in the study. Of these, 31% (n = 113) were managed expectantly, 30% (n = 110) with laser surgery, 19% (n = 70) with IUT (± PET), 12% (n = 43) with delivery, 8% (n = 30) with selective feticide and 1% (n = 4) underwent termination of pregnancy. Perinatal mortality occurred in 17% (39/225) of pregnancies in the expectant-management group, 18% (38/215) in the laser group, 18% (25/140) in the IUT (± PET) group, 10% (9/86) in the delivery group and in 7% (2/30) of the cotwins in the selective-feticide group. The incidence of severe neonatal morbidity was 49% (41/84) in the delivery group, 46% (56/122) in the IUT (± PET) group, 31% (60/193) in the expectant-management group, 31% (57/182) in the laser-surgery group and 25% (7/28) in the selective-feticide group. Median diagnosis-to-birth interval was longest after selective feticide (10.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 4.2-14.9) weeks), followed by laser surgery (9.7 (IQR, 6.6-12.7) weeks), expectant management (7.8 (IQR, 3.8-14.4) weeks), IUT (± PET) (4.0 (IQR, 2.0-6.9) weeks) and delivery (0.3 (IQR, 0.0-0.5) weeks). Treatment choice for TAPS varied greatly within and between the 17 fetal therapy centers. Antenatal treatment for TAPS differs considerably amongst fetal therapy centers. Perinatal mortality and morbidity were high in all management groups. Prolongation of pregnancy was best achieved by expectant management, treatment by laser surgery or selective feticide. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32291846
doi: 10.1002/uog.22042
pmc: PMC7497010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
378-387Investigateurs
J M Middeldorp
(JM)
M C Haak
(MC)
F J C M Klumper
(FJCM)
J Akkermans
(J)
H Delagrange
(H)
V Pandya
(V)
S Faiola
(S)
R Favre
(R)
S R Hobson
(SR)
C Rodo
(C)
B Thilaganathan
(B)
R Papanna
(R)
P Greimel
(P)
M Tavares de Sousa
(M)
A Carlin
(A)
K A Gladkova
(KA)
J A Copel
(JA)
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):432-6
pubmed: 26094734
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Mar;30(3):251-5
pubmed: 20087909
Behav Brain Res. 1992 Jul 31;49(1):1-6
pubmed: 1388792
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):304-10
pubmed: 24706478
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 05;9(6):
pubmed: 32517071
Clin Perinatol. 1989 Jun;16(2):387-411
pubmed: 2663308
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 8;351(2):136-44
pubmed: 15238624
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(3):170-8
pubmed: 25790745
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):702-6
pubmed: 23124777
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):514.e1-8
pubmed: 18533114
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul 27;:
pubmed: 32730900
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):316-21
pubmed: 24753027
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jul;41(7):981-991
pubmed: 31230662
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2144-51
pubmed: 24613024
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):39-46
pubmed: 31432580
J Vis Exp. 2011 Sep 05;(55):e3208
pubmed: 21912373
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;19(3):222-33
pubmed: 27068715
Ann Surg. 1978 Jan;187(1):1-7
pubmed: 413500
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(4):181-90
pubmed: 20339296
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):796-803
pubmed: 16522415
Placenta. 2007 Jan;28(1):47-51
pubmed: 16516289
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;102(8):1130-4
pubmed: 6547831
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Dec;56(12):900-4
pubmed: 7332336