Genetic characterization of a unique neuroendocrine transdifferentiation prostate circulating tumor cell-derived eXplant model.
Animals
Benzamides
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine
/ genetics
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Transdifferentiation
/ genetics
Disease Models, Animal
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Homeodomain Proteins
/ metabolism
Humans
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred NOD
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
/ drug effects
Nitriles
Phenylthiohydantoin
/ analogs & derivatives
Phylogeny
Prostate
/ metabolism
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ genetics
Receptors, Androgen
/ genetics
Sequence Alignment
Serine Endopeptidases
/ metabolism
Transcription Factors
/ metabolism
Transcriptome
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
/ genetics
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2020
20 04 2020
Historique:
received:
11
01
2019
accepted:
04
03
2020
entrez:
22
4
2020
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
5
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Transformation of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) into an aggressive neuroendocrine disease (CRPC-NE) represents a major clinical challenge and experimental models are lacking. A CTC-derived eXplant (CDX) and a CDX-derived cell line are established using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) obtained by diagnostic leukapheresis from a CRPC patient resistant to enzalutamide. The CDX and the derived-cell line conserve 16% of primary tumor (PT) and 56% of CTC mutations, as well as 83% of PT copy-number aberrations including clonal TMPRSS2-ERG fusion and NKX3.1 loss. Both harbor an androgen receptor-null neuroendocrine phenotype, TP53, PTEN and RB1 loss. While PTEN and RB1 loss are acquired in CTCs, evolutionary analysis suggest that a PT subclone harboring TP53 loss is the driver of the metastatic event leading to the CDX. This CDX model provides insights on the sequential acquisition of key drivers of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation and offers a unique tool for effective drug screening in CRPC-NE management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32313004
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15426-2
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-15426-2
pmc: PMC7171138
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzamides
0
Homeodomain Proteins
0
NKX3-1 protein, human
0
Nitriles
0
Receptors, Androgen
0
TP53 protein, human
0
Transcription Factors
0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Serine Endopeptidases
EC 3.4.21.-
TMPRSS2 protein, human
EC 3.4.21.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1884Références
de Bono, J. S. et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet 376, 1147–1154 (2010).
pubmed: 20888992
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61389-X
de Bono, J. S. et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1995–2005 (2011).
pubmed: 21612468
pmcid: 3471149
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618
Beer, T. M. et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 424–433 (2014).
pubmed: 24881730
pmcid: 4418931
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095
Kantoff, P. W. et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 411–422 (2010).
pubmed: 20818862
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294
Parker, C. et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 213–223 (2013).
pubmed: 23863050
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213755
Petrylak, D. P. et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 1513–1520 (2004).
pubmed: 15470214
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041318
Beltran, H. et al. Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 22, 298–305 (2016).
pubmed: 26855148
pmcid: 4777652
doi: 10.1038/nm.4045
Beltran, H. et al. Molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and identification of new drug targets. Cancer Discov. 1, 487–495 (2011).
pubmed: 22389870
pmcid: 3290518
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0130
Epstein, J. I. et al. Proposed morphologic classification of prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 38, 756–767 (2014).
pubmed: 24705311
pmcid: 4112087
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000208
Gao, D. et al. Organoid cultures derived from patients with advanced prostate cancer. Cell 159, 176–187 (2014).
pubmed: 25201530
pmcid: 4237931
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.016
Lambros, M. B. et al. Single-cell analyses of prostate cancer liquid biopsies acquired by apheresis. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 5635–5644 (2018).
Puca, L. et al. Patient derived organoids to model rare prostate cancer phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2404 (2018).
pubmed: 29921838
pmcid: 6008438
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04495-z
Namekawa, T., Ikeda, K., Horie-Inoue, K. & Inoue, S. Application of prostate cancer models for preclinical study: advantages and limitations of cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and three-dimensional culture of patient-derived cells. Cells 8, 74 (2019).
pmcid: 6357050
doi: 10.3390/cells8010074
pubmed: 6357050
True, L. D. et al. A neuroendocrine/small cell prostate carcinoma xenograft-LuCaP 49. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 705–715 (2002).
pubmed: 12163395
pmcid: 1850754
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64226-5
de Bono, J. S. et al. Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 6302–6309 (2008).
pubmed: 18829513
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0872
Olmos, D. et al. Circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts as intermediate end points in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a single-centre experience. Ann. Oncol. 20, 27–33 (2009).
pubmed: 18695026
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn544
Massard, C. et al. Phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of tumor tissue and circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a report from the PETRUS prospective study. Oncotarget 7, 55069–55082 (2016).
pubmed: 27391263
pmcid: 5342402
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10396
Attard, G. et al. Characterization of ERG, AR and PTEN gene status in circulating tumor cells from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 2912–2918 (2009).
pubmed: 19339269
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3667
Fischer, J. C. et al. Diagnostic leukapheresis enables reliable detection of circulating tumor cells of nonmetastatic cancer patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16580–16585 (2013).
pubmed: 24065821
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313594110
Andree, K. C. et al. Toward a real liquid biopsy in metastatic breast and prostate cancer: diagnostic leukapheresis increases CTC yields in a European prospective multicenter study (CTCTrap). Int. J. Cancer 143, 2584–2591 (2018).
pubmed: 30006930
pmcid: 6637919
doi: 10.1002/ijc.31752
Fehm, T. N. et al. Diagnostic leukapheresis for CTC analysis in breast cancer patients: CTC frequency, clinical experiences and recommendations for standardized reporting. Cytometry A 93, 1213–1219 (2018).
pubmed: 30551262
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23669
Baccelli, I. et al. Identification of a population of blood circulating tumor cells from breast cancer patients that initiates metastasis in a xenograft assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 539–544 (2013).
pubmed: 23609047
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2576
Hodgkinson, C. L. et al. Tumorigenicity and genetic profiling of circulating tumor cells in small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 20, 897–903 (2014).
pubmed: 24880617
doi: 10.1038/nm.3600
Girotti, M. R. et al. Application of sequencing, liquid biopsies, and patient-derived xenografts for personalized medicine in melanoma. Cancer Discov. 6, 286–299 (2016).
pubmed: 26715644
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1336
Morrow, C. J. et al. Tumourigenic non-small-cell lung cancer mesenchymal circulating tumour cells: a clinical case study. Ann. Oncol. 27, 1155–1160 (2016).
pubmed: 27013395
pmcid: 4880063
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw122
Cayrefourcq, L. et al. Establishment and characterization of a cell line from human circulating colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 75, 892–901 (2015).
pubmed: 25592149
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2613
Yu, M. et al. Cancer therapy. Ex vivo culture of circulating breast tumor cells for individualized testing of drug susceptibility. Science 345, 216–220 (2014).
pubmed: 25013076
pmcid: 4358808
doi: 10.1126/science.1253533
Aggarwal, R. et al. Clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-emergent small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a multi-institutional prospective study. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 2492–2503 (2018).
pubmed: 29985747
pmcid: 6366813
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6880
Zou, M. et al. Transdifferentiation as a mechanism of treatment resistance in a mouse model of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Discov. 7, 736–749 (2017).
pubmed: 28411207
pmcid: 5501744
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1174
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).
pubmed: 22588877
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).
pubmed: 23550210
pmcid: 4160307
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088
Legrier, M. E. et al. Potentiation of antitumour activity of docetaxel by combination with trastuzumab in a human prostate cancer xenograft model and underlying mechanisms. Br. J. Cancer 96, 269–276 (2007).
pubmed: 17211467
pmcid: 2359985
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603553
Kaighn, M. E., Narayan, K. S., Ohnuki, Y., Lechner, J. F. & Jones, L. W. Establishment and characterization of a human prostatic carcinoma cell line (PC-3). Invest. Urol. 17, 16–23 (1979).
pubmed: 447482
Tai, S. et al. PC3 is a cell line characteristic of prostatic small cell carcinoma. Prostate 71, 1668–1679 (2011).
pubmed: 21432867
pmcid: 3426349
doi: 10.1002/pros.21383
Lovf, M. et al. Multifocal primary prostate cancer exhibits high degree of genomic heterogeneity. Eur. Urol. 75, 498–505 (2018).
pubmed: 30181068
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.009
Lohr, J. G. et al. Whole-exome sequencing of circulating tumor cells provides a window into metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 479–484 (2014).
pubmed: 24752078
pmcid: 4034575
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2892
Ku, S. Y. et al. Rb1 and Trp53 cooperate to suppress prostate cancer lineage plasticity, metastasis, and antiandrogen resistance. Science 355, 78–83 (2017).
pubmed: 28059767
pmcid: 28059767
doi: 10.1126/science.aah4199
Hamid, A. A. et al. Compound genomic alterations of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 tumor suppressors in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 77, 89–97 (2018).
Mu, P. et al. SOX2 promotes lineage plasticity and antiandrogen resistance in TP53- and RB1-deficient prostate cancer. Science 355, 84–88 (2017).
pubmed: 28059768
pmcid: 5247742
doi: 10.1126/science.aah4307
Flores-Morales, A. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of patient-derived xenografts highlights the role of REST in neuroendocrine differentiation of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 595–608 (2019).
pubmed: 30274982
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0729
Gong, Y., Chippada-Venkata, U. D., Galsky, M. D., Huang, J. & Oh, W. K. Elevated circulating tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) levels are associated with neuroendocrine differentiation in castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 75, 616–627 (2015).
pubmed: 25560638
doi: 10.1002/pros.22945
Xing, N., Qian, J., Bostwick, D., Bergstralh, E. & Young, C. Y. Neuroendocrine cells in human prostate over-express the anti-apoptosis protein survivin. Prostate 48, 7–15 (2001).
pubmed: 11391682
doi: 10.1002/pros.1076
Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).
pubmed: 30013179
pmcid: 6072608
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0165-1
Polzer, B. et al. Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells with diagnostic intention. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 1371–1386 (2014).
pubmed: 25358515
pmcid: 4237466
doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404033
Gnirke, A. et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 182–189 (2009).
pubmed: 19182786
pmcid: 2663421
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1523
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10 (2011).
Khandelwal, G. et al. Next-generation sequencing analysis and algorithms for PDX and CDX models. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 1012–1016 (2017).
pubmed: 28442585
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0431
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 19451168
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).
pubmed: 25697820
pmcid: 4765878
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
pubmed: 21478889
pmcid: 3083463
doi: 10.1038/ng.806
Van der Auwera, G. A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 43, 11 10 11–11 10 33 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).
pubmed: 23396013
pmcid: 3833702
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2514
McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
pubmed: 4893825
pmcid: 4893825
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
Tamborero, D. et al. Cancer Genome Interpreter annotates the biological and clinical relevance of tumor alterations. Genome Med 10, 25 (2018).
pubmed: 29592813
pmcid: 5875005
doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0531-8
Venkatraman, E. S. & Olshen, A. B. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23, 657–663 (2007).
pubmed: 17234643
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl646
Popova, T. et al. Genome Alteration Print (GAP): a tool to visualize and mine complex cancer genomic profiles obtained by SNP arrays. Genome Biol. 10, R128 (2009).
pubmed: 19903341
pmcid: 2810663
doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r128
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).
pubmed: 21169378
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706
Nixon, K. C. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407–414 (1999).
doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00277.x
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
pubmed: 20979621
pmcid: 20979621
doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
Wang, L., Wang, S. & Li, W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 2184–2185 (2012).
pubmed: 22743226
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356
Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010).
pubmed: 20196867
pmcid: 2864565
doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792
pmcid: 4402510
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Grasso, C. S. et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487, 239–243 (2012).
pubmed: 22722839
pmcid: 3396711
doi: 10.1038/nature11125
Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).
pubmed: 23622249
pmcid: 3690918
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.021
Robinson, D. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 161, 1215–1228 (2015).
pubmed: 26000489
pmcid: 4484602
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001
Kumar, A. et al. Substantial interindividual and limited intraindividual genomic diversity among tumors from men with metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 22, 369–378 (2016).
pubmed: 26928463
pmcid: 5045679
doi: 10.1038/nm.4053
Abida, W. et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.17.00029 (2017).
Armenia, J. et al. The long tail of oncogenic drivers in prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. 50, 645–651 (2018).
pubmed: 29610475
pmcid: 6107367
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0078-z
Abida, W. et al. Genomic correlates of clinical outcome in advanced prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11428–11436 (2019).
pubmed: 31061129
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902651116