HDAC inhibitors elicit metabolic reprogramming by targeting super-enhancers in glioblastoma models.
Animals
Cellular Reprogramming
/ drug effects
Fatty Acids
/ metabolism
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Glycolysis
/ drug effects
HCT116 Cells
Histone Deacetylase 1
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Histone Deacetylase 2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Humans
Mice
Oxidative Phosphorylation
/ drug effects
PPAR delta
/ metabolism
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha
/ metabolism
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc
/ metabolism
Response Elements
Intermediary metabolism
Oncology
Journal
The Journal of clinical investigation
ISSN: 1558-8238
Titre abrégé: J Clin Invest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
22
03
2019
accepted:
09
04
2020
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
3
2
2021
entrez:
22
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Warburg effect is a tumor-related phenomenon that could potentially be targeted therapeutically. Here, we showed that glioblastoma (GBM) cultures and patients' tumors harbored super-enhancers in several genes related to the Warburg effect. By conducting a transcriptome analysis followed by ChIP-Seq coupled with a comprehensive metabolite analysis in GBM models, we found that FDA-approved global (panobinostat, vorinostat) and selective (romidepsin) histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors elicited metabolic reprogramming in concert with disruption of several Warburg effect-related super-enhancers. Extracellular flux and carbon-tracing analyses revealed that HDAC inhibitors blunted glycolysis in a c-Myc-dependent manner and lowered ATP levels. This resulted in the engagement of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) driven by elevated fatty acid oxidation (FAO), rendering GBM cells dependent on these pathways. Mechanistically, interference with HDAC1/-2 elicited a suppression of c-Myc protein levels and a concomitant increase in 2 transcriptional drivers of oxidative metabolism, PGC1α and PPARD, suggesting an inverse relationship. Rescue and ChIP experiments indicated that c-Myc bound to the promoter regions of PGC1α and PPARD to counteract their upregulation driven by HDAC1/-2 inhibition. Finally, we demonstrated that combination treatment with HDAC and FAO inhibitors extended animal survival in patient-derived xenograft model systems in vivo more potently than single treatments in the absence of toxicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32315286
pii: 129049
doi: 10.1172/JCI129049
pmc: PMC7324177
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Fatty Acids
0
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
0
MYC protein, human
0
PPAR delta
0
PPARGC1A protein, human
0
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc
0
HDAC1 protein, human
EC 3.5.1.98
HDAC2 protein, human
EC 3.5.1.98
Histone Deacetylase 1
EC 3.5.1.98
Histone Deacetylase 2
EC 3.5.1.98
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3699-3716Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001430
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS095848
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA013696
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K08 NS083732
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR027050
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS102366
Pays : United States
Références
Cancer Cell. 2017 Dec 11;32(6):748-760.e6
pubmed: 29232553
Cell Metab. 2016 Nov 8;24(5):716-727
pubmed: 27746050
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Aug;38(15):4958-69
pubmed: 20385584
Nat Chem Biol. 2016 Jun;12(6):452-8
pubmed: 27110680
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jul;7(7):716-735
pubmed: 28416471
Cell Metab. 2015 Jun 2;21(6):805-21
pubmed: 26039447
Cell Metab. 2015 Oct 6;22(4):590-605
pubmed: 26365176
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;1870(1):43-50
pubmed: 29791870
J Biol Chem. 2013 Dec 6;288(49):35287-96
pubmed: 24133218
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 06;7:43864
pubmed: 28262837
Nature. 2011 Aug 18;476(7360):346-50
pubmed: 21760589
Cell Rep. 2017 Jun 13;19(11):2289-2303
pubmed: 28614715
Nature. 2014 Oct 30;514(7524):628-32
pubmed: 25119024
Cell Metab. 2016 Jan 12;23(1):27-47
pubmed: 26771115
Cell Metab. 2013 Nov 5;18(5):726-39
pubmed: 24140020
Blood. 2012 Apr 26;119(17):4017-25
pubmed: 22408261
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E743-E752
pubmed: 29311302
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):E1288-96
pubmed: 25737542
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jun 07;11(6):
pubmed: 31181660
Cancer Cell. 2017 May 8;31(5):635-652.e6
pubmed: 28434841
Cell. 2013 Nov 7;155(4):934-47
pubmed: 24119843
Cell Rep. 2016 Feb 9;14(5):979-990
pubmed: 26804906
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 20;8(1):1067
pubmed: 29057925
Nat Genet. 2011 Jul 31;43(9):869-74
pubmed: 21804546
J Clin Invest. 2016 May 2;126(5):1834-56
pubmed: 27043285
Cancer Cell. 2013 Dec 9;24(6):777-90
pubmed: 24332044
Mol Cell. 2017 Jul 20;67(2):252-265.e6
pubmed: 28689661
Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;78(18):5408-5418
pubmed: 30054337
Nat Genet. 2015 Dec;47(12):1475-81
pubmed: 26482881
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2017 Oct;12(10):1031-1040
pubmed: 28712306
Cancer Cell. 2013 Mar 18;23(3):302-15
pubmed: 23477830
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 8;10(1):3004
pubmed: 31285436
Cell. 2013 Apr 11;153(2):307-19
pubmed: 23582322
Nature. 2016 Apr 14;532(7598):255-8
pubmed: 27049945
JCI Insight. 2017 Jan 26;2(2):e88815
pubmed: 28138554
Cancer Discov. 2019 Sep;9(9):1248-1267
pubmed: 31201181
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 14;8(11):18577-18589
pubmed: 28099914
Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):440-6
pubmed: 20068163
Nature. 2016 Sep 15;537(7620):422-426
pubmed: 27580028
Oncogene. 2017 Feb 9;36(6):787-796
pubmed: 27399335
Nature. 2018 Jan 4;553(7686):101-105
pubmed: 29258295
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Feb 28;46(4):1756-1776
pubmed: 29240919
J Clin Invest. 2017 Jan 3;127(1):153-168
pubmed: 27893461
Cancer Cell. 2013 Mar 18;23(3):287-301
pubmed: 23416000
Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 1;77(13):3513-3526
pubmed: 28522750