National Immunization Program Information System: implementation context assessment.
Health assessment
Immunization
Immunization programs
Information systems
Public health nursing
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Apr 2020
21 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
18
06
2019
accepted:
31
03
2020
entrez:
23
4
2020
pubmed:
23
4
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The National Immunization Program Information System (SIPNI - Sistema de Informação do Programa Nacional de Imunização) in Brazil is a technological innovation management tool that enhances the performance of managers and health professionals in the evaluation and monitoring of immunization activities. In the country, the decentralization of the System is at an advanced stage, but it still faces challenges regarding its operation and use, impacting on its results. This study aims to evaluate the deployment of SIPNI in the state of Minas Gerais, in 2017. Cross-section study performed in Primary Healthcare vaccination rooms in 54 municipalities in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, in 2017. A multidimensional questionnaire was used with nursing professionals who work in vaccination rooms, containing questions about the structure (presence of an internet-connected computer, instruction manual, software version, IT professional for technical support, trained healthcare professional, use of communication channels to obtain system information) and the process (activities performed by the staff to operate the immunization information system) of their work. Those questions refer to the components of the information system: system management, immunized-patient records, and Movement of Immunobiological. Implementation Degree (ID) was defined by a score system with different weights for each criterion, according to the importance level observed in it, with a rating of: adequate, partially adequate, inadequate and critically inadequate. For data analysis, median was used as the summary measure, and Pearson's Chi-Squared Test was used for proportion comparison. Municipal SIPNI is not adequately implemented and that results mainly from the actions performed in health service units, indicating problems in the use of technology by professionals working in vaccination rooms. The structure was better evaluated than the process, presenting IDs of 70.9 and 59.5%, respectively. Insufficient internet access, inadequate use of communication channels, and lack of professional qualification were some of the identified structural issues. "Movement of Immunobiological" was the best-ranked component (ID = 68.5%), followed by "immunized patient records" (ID = 59.3%) and "SIPNI management" (ID = 50.7%). Partial performance of SIPNI is independent of population size in the municipality and of FSH coverage. SIPNI is still an underutilized technological innovation. There are challenges that must be overcome, such as implementation of the final web version, internet connectivity, and capabilities aimed at the use of information generated by technology. Nevertheless, perspectives regarding SIPNI are positive, with functionalities to optimize activities in vaccination rooms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The National Immunization Program Information System (SIPNI - Sistema de Informação do Programa Nacional de Imunização) in Brazil is a technological innovation management tool that enhances the performance of managers and health professionals in the evaluation and monitoring of immunization activities. In the country, the decentralization of the System is at an advanced stage, but it still faces challenges regarding its operation and use, impacting on its results. This study aims to evaluate the deployment of SIPNI in the state of Minas Gerais, in 2017.
METHOD
METHODS
Cross-section study performed in Primary Healthcare vaccination rooms in 54 municipalities in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, in 2017. A multidimensional questionnaire was used with nursing professionals who work in vaccination rooms, containing questions about the structure (presence of an internet-connected computer, instruction manual, software version, IT professional for technical support, trained healthcare professional, use of communication channels to obtain system information) and the process (activities performed by the staff to operate the immunization information system) of their work. Those questions refer to the components of the information system: system management, immunized-patient records, and Movement of Immunobiological. Implementation Degree (ID) was defined by a score system with different weights for each criterion, according to the importance level observed in it, with a rating of: adequate, partially adequate, inadequate and critically inadequate. For data analysis, median was used as the summary measure, and Pearson's Chi-Squared Test was used for proportion comparison.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Municipal SIPNI is not adequately implemented and that results mainly from the actions performed in health service units, indicating problems in the use of technology by professionals working in vaccination rooms. The structure was better evaluated than the process, presenting IDs of 70.9 and 59.5%, respectively. Insufficient internet access, inadequate use of communication channels, and lack of professional qualification were some of the identified structural issues. "Movement of Immunobiological" was the best-ranked component (ID = 68.5%), followed by "immunized patient records" (ID = 59.3%) and "SIPNI management" (ID = 50.7%). Partial performance of SIPNI is independent of population size in the municipality and of FSH coverage.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
SIPNI is still an underutilized technological innovation. There are challenges that must be overcome, such as implementation of the final web version, internet connectivity, and capabilities aimed at the use of information generated by technology. Nevertheless, perspectives regarding SIPNI are positive, with functionalities to optimize activities in vaccination rooms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32316947
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05175-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05175-9
pmc: PMC7171780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
333Subventions
Organisme : FAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais
ID : APQ-03787-17; APQ-01505-17
Organisme : CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ID : Funding Code 001
Références
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 May-Jun;35(5-6):453-7
pubmed: 25211576
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jun;9(6):1346-50
pubmed: 23422024
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:39
pubmed: 26176746
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Oct;29(10):2105-18
pubmed: 24127104
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016 Oct-Dec;25(4):745-754
pubmed: 27869968
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Sep;19(9):3889-98
pubmed: 25184594
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Feb;169:51-57
pubmed: 30638591
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 1):615-624
pubmed: 29562019
Online J Public Health Inform. 2014 Feb 05;5(3):227
pubmed: 24678380
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S9
pubmed: 23819699
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):8-9
pubmed: 24998803
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:91
pubmed: 24572013
Online J Public Health Inform. 2015 Jul 01;7(2):e210
pubmed: 26392841
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):621
pubmed: 30089497
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 May;31(5):960-70
pubmed: 26083171
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):713-4
pubmed: 25700062
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Mar;20(3):947-56
pubmed: 25760134
Biomed Inform Insights. 2017 Feb 09;9:1178222616688893
pubmed: 28469430
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Jun 05;33(5):e00172815
pubmed: 28640330
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Jul;15(3):227-30
pubmed: 24968956