The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 09 09 2019
accepted: 14 04 2020
entrez: 1 5 2020
pubmed: 1 5 2020
medline: 6 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype. Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55). The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32349655
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9
pmc: PMC7191696
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

326

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81771534
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81820108016
Organisme : Key science and technology foundation of Henan Province
ID : 172102310082
Organisme : Key research projects of Henan higher education institutions
ID : 18A320057

Références

Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1160-4
pubmed: 21851937
Mol Cytogenet. 2017 Sep 2;10:32
pubmed: 28878823
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Feb;36(2):315-324
pubmed: 30421343
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun;22(6):748-53
pubmed: 24129433
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):655-662
pubmed: 29276169
Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):486-492
pubmed: 29428313
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):e1996-2001
pubmed: 23713105
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):941-9
pubmed: 21292638
Andrologia. 2015 Mar;47(2):178-85
pubmed: 24612408
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jun;36(6):677-685
pubmed: 29627226
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Apr 30;134(3):309-14
pubmed: 15732062
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jun;164A(6):1530-6
pubmed: 24648389
Gene. 2013 Mar 1;516(1):176-80
pubmed: 23262338
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 May;34(5):659-669
pubmed: 28236108
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2017 Fall;6(4):243-248
pubmed: 29988217
Gene. 2013 Jan 1;512(1):157-60
pubmed: 23031811
Mol Cytogenet. 2014 Nov 19;7(1):83
pubmed: 25426170
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Sep;37(3):375-382
pubmed: 30314889
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Aug;34(8):1095-1100
pubmed: 28555358

Auteurs

Gang Li (G)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China. lgvigor@126.com.

Weiyi Shi (W)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China.

Wenbin Niu (W)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China.

Jiawei Xu (J)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China.

Yihong Guo (Y)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China.

Yingchun Su (Y)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China.

Yingpu Sun (Y)

Reproductive Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, China. syp2008@vip.sina.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH