Needling after trabeculectomy - does augmentation by anti-metabolites provide better outcomes and is Mitomycin C better than 5-Fluoruracil? A systematic review with network meta-analyses.


Journal

Acta ophthalmologica
ISSN: 1755-3768
Titre abrégé: Acta Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101468102

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 22 12 2019
accepted: 02 04 2020
pubmed: 1 5 2020
medline: 6 7 2021
entrez: 1 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Favourable outcome after glaucoma surgery depends on proper control of the inflammatory response. Failing filtration bleb and consequently increased intraocular pressure is an important cause of continuous visual field deterioration after uncomplicated glaucoma surgery. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of employing either Mitomycin C (MMC), 5-Fluoruracil (5-FU) or no anti-metabolite in needling revision of trabeculectomies. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE to identify randomized and non-randomized trials published between year 2000 and March 2019 comparing the efficacy of needling filtering blebs when using no anti-fibrotic agent, MMC or 5-FU in patients with glaucoma. Efficacy was defined as intraocular pressure at 12 months or latest follow-up, rate of complications, rates of success and the number of re-needling cases. Comparisons were made using network meta-analyses. We identified one randomized trial and five retrospective trials. Twelve months after needling revision of trabeculectomy, no significant difference was observed when comparing the effect of the use of MMC with 5-FU or without any use of anti-metabolite on intraocular pressure, complication rates, qualified success, complete success or number of re-needling cases. We found no significant difference in the efficacy of using either MMC, 5-FU or no anti-metabolite in needling revision of trabeculectomies. The number of studies meeting our inclusion criteria was limited. Considering the design of studies, only one was randomized leading to an overall low quality of evidence on the subject matter. Further research is warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32352646
doi: 10.1111/aos.14452
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors 0
Mitomycin 50SG953SK6
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

643-653

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Anand N & Khan A (2009): Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report. J Glaucoma 18: 513-520.
Cabourne E, Clarke JCK, Schlottmann PG & Evans JR (2015): Mitomycin C versus 5-Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11: Cd006259.
Doi SAR & Barendregt JJ (2018): A generalized pairwise modelling framework for network meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc 16: 187-194.
European Glaucoma Society (2017): Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition - Chapter 2: Classification and terminology. Br J Ophthalmol. 101: 73-127.
Fagerli M, Lofors KT & Elsas T (2003): Needling revision of failed filtering blebs after trabeculectomy: a retrospective study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81: 577-582.
Feldman RM & Tabet RR (2008): Needle revision of filtering blebs. J Glaucoma 17: 594-600.
Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S et al. (2017): Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 5: e1221-e1234.
Ghoneim EM & Abd El Hameed M (2011): Needling augmented with topical application of mitomycin C for management of bleb failure. J Glaucoma 20: 528-532.
Greenfield DS, Miller MP, Suner IJ & Palmberg PF (1996): Needle elevation of the scleral flap for failing filtration blebs after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol 122: 195-204.
Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Cabarga C & Teus MA (2006): Prospective evaluation of preoperative factors associated with successful mitomycin C needling of failed filtration blebs. J Glaucoma 15: 98-102.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. (2011): GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 64: 395-400.
Hawkins AS, Flanagan JK & Brown SV (2002): Predictors for success of needle revision of failing filtration blebs. Ophthalmology 109: 781-785.
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L & Hussein M (2002): Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 1268-1279.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ & Welch VA (eds). (2019): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane. Available at www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (Accessed on 17 Mar 2020).
Iwach AG, Delgado MF, Novack GD, Nguyen N & Wong PC (2003): Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle revisions of failing filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 110: 734-742.
Kapasi MS & Birt CM (2009): The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil bleb needling performed 1 year or more posttrabeculectomy: a retrospective study. J Glaucoma 18: 144-148.
Kapetansky FM & Kapetansky SD (1999): Antimetabolite use in revising failing filtering blebs. Semin Ophthalmol 14: 144-151.
Kim JS, Kim HJ, Na KI, Kim YK, Park KH & Jeoung JW (2019): Comparison of efficacy and safety of bleb needle revision with and without 5-fluorouracil for failing trabeculectomy bleb. J Glaucoma 28: 386-391.
King AJ, Rotchford AP, Alwitry A & Moodie J (2007): Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91: 873-877.
Kirwan JF, Lockwood AJ, Shah P et al. (2013): Trabeculectomy in the 21st century: a multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology 120: 2532-2539.
Labbé A & Baudouin C (2014): Modulation of Wound Healing: Choice of Antifibrosis Therapies. In: Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Hitchings RA & Crowston JG (eds.). Glaucoma Medical Diagnosis & Therapy. London: Elsevier Saunders 894-905.
Lama PJ & Fechtner RD (2003): Antifibrotics and wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 48: 314-346.
Liu W, Wang J, Zhang M, Tao Y & Sun Y (2016): Comparison of subconjunctival mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil injection for needle revision of early failed trabeculectomy blebs. J Ophthalmol 2016: 3762674.
Mardelli PG, Lederer CM Jr, Murray PL, Pastor SA & Hassanein KM (1996): Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 103: 1946-1955.
Masoumpour MB, Nowroozzadeh MH & Razeghinejad MR (2016): Current and future techniques in wound healing modulation after glaucoma filtering surgeries. Open Ophthalmol J 10: 68-85.
Mercieca K, Drury B, Bhargava A & Fenerty C (2018): Trabeculectomy bleb needling and antimetabolite administration practices in the UK: a glaucoma specialist national survey. Br J Ophthalmol 102: 1244-1247.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al. (2015): Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4: 1.
Murdoch I (2012): Post-operative management of trabeculectomy in the first three months. Community Eye Health 25: 73-75.
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009): Levels of Evidence. Available at www.cebm.net/2009/06/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/ Accessed on 17 Mar 2020.
Palejwala N, Ichhpujani P, Fakhraie G, Myers JS, Moster MR & Katz LJ (2010): Single needle revision of failing filtration blebs: a retrospective comparative case series with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Eur J Ophthalmol 20: 1026-1034.
Rotchford AP & King AJ (2010): Moving the goal posts. definitions of success after glaucoma surgery and their effect on reported outcome. Ophthalmology 117: 18-23.e13.
Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB & Grehn F (2009): Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. The Hague, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: World Glaucoma Association. Kugler Publications, 15-24.
Shetty RK, Wartluft L & Moster MR (2005): Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 14: 52-56.
Solish AM (2018): Needle revision of filtration blebs. Adv Ophthalmol Optometry 3: 229-242.
Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T & Cheng CY (2014): Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121: 2081-2090.
Weinreb R, Aung T & Medeiros F (2014): The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 311: 1901-1911.
Yamanaka O, Kitano-Izutani A, Tomoyose K & Reinach PS (2015): Pathobiology of wound healing after glaucoma filtration surgery. BMC Ophthalmol 15(Suppl 1): 157.

Auteurs

Andrim Halili (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Line Kessel (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Yousif Subhi (Y)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Daniella Bach-Holm (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH