Effects of Liraglutide on Worsening Renal Function Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the FIGHT Trial.
Aged
Double-Blind Method
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
/ drug effects
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
/ agonists
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Hospitalization
Humans
Incretins
/ adverse effects
Kidney
/ drug effects
Liraglutide
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
/ drug effects
Journal
Circulation. Heart failure
ISSN: 1941-3297
Titre abrégé: Circ Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
entrez:
5
5
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The FIGHT (Functional Impact of GLP-1 [glucagon-like peptide-1] for Heart Failure Treatment) trial randomized 300 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a recent hospitalization for heart failure to liraglutide versus placebo. While there was no difference in the primary outcome (rank score of time to death, time to rehospitalization for heart failure, and change in NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), there was a significant increase in cystatin C among patients randomized to liraglutide raising concern of adverse renal outcomes. We performed a post hoc analysis of FIGHT to investigate whether liraglutide was associated with worsening renal function (WRF). The relationship between randomization to liraglutide and WRF was evaluated using logistic regression models. Two hundred seventy-four patients (91%) had complete data to assess for WRF defined as: increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dL, or ≥25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C ≥0.3 mg/L from baseline to 180-days. Patients with WRF (n=113, 41%), compared with those without, were older, had more comorbidities, and lower utilization of guideline-directed medical treatment. Logistic regression models showed that age and baseline cystatin C levels were associated with WRF. In adjusted models, liraglutide was not associated with excess risk of WRF compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.62-1.67]). There was also no difference in the rank score when WRF was added as a fourth-tier outcome. Liraglutide was not associated with WRF among patients with HFrEF and a recent hospitalization for heart failure. These data support the relative renal safety profile of liraglutide among patients with HFrEF. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01800968.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The FIGHT (Functional Impact of GLP-1 [glucagon-like peptide-1] for Heart Failure Treatment) trial randomized 300 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a recent hospitalization for heart failure to liraglutide versus placebo. While there was no difference in the primary outcome (rank score of time to death, time to rehospitalization for heart failure, and change in NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), there was a significant increase in cystatin C among patients randomized to liraglutide raising concern of adverse renal outcomes. We performed a post hoc analysis of FIGHT to investigate whether liraglutide was associated with worsening renal function (WRF).
METHODS
The relationship between randomization to liraglutide and WRF was evaluated using logistic regression models. Two hundred seventy-four patients (91%) had complete data to assess for WRF defined as: increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dL, or ≥25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C ≥0.3 mg/L from baseline to 180-days.
RESULTS
Patients with WRF (n=113, 41%), compared with those without, were older, had more comorbidities, and lower utilization of guideline-directed medical treatment. Logistic regression models showed that age and baseline cystatin C levels were associated with WRF. In adjusted models, liraglutide was not associated with excess risk of WRF compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.62-1.67]). There was also no difference in the rank score when WRF was added as a fourth-tier outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Liraglutide was not associated with WRF among patients with HFrEF and a recent hospitalization for heart failure. These data support the relative renal safety profile of liraglutide among patients with HFrEF. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01800968.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32362166
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006758
pmc: PMC7906045
mid: NIHMS1581987
doi:
Substances chimiques
GLP1R protein, human
0
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
0
Incretins
0
Liraglutide
839I73S42A
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01800968']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e006758Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002541
Pays : United States
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 2;73(12):1596-1598
pubmed: 30922481
Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct;32(20):2563-72
pubmed: 21785107
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):500-8
pubmed: 27483064
Heart Fail Clin. 2019 Oct;15(4):455-461
pubmed: 31472881
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):839-848
pubmed: 28854085
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;7(10):776-785
pubmed: 31422062
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Circulation. 2019 Aug 13;140(7):e294-e324
pubmed: 31167558
Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 1;85(9):1110-3
pubmed: 10781761
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):11-22
pubmed: 26132939
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323
pubmed: 31497854
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1035-1043
pubmed: 30120812
Eur Heart J. 2014 Dec 21;35(48):3413-6
pubmed: 25157110
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Jan;19(1):69-77
pubmed: 27790809