Comparison of Materials Used for 3D-Printing Temporal Bone Models to Simulate Surgical Dissection.
Acrylic Resins
Butadienes
Humans
Mastoidectomy
/ education
Materials Testing
Models, Anatomic
Neurotology
/ education
Otologic Surgical Procedures
/ education
Polycarboxylate Cement
Polymers
Polystyrenes
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Simulation Training
Stereolithography
Temporal Bone
/ surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3D-printing
cadaver
education
simulation
surgery
temporal bone
Journal
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology
ISSN: 1943-572X
Titre abrégé: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0407300
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify 3D-printed temporal bone (TB) models that most accurately recreate cortical mastoidectomy for use as a training tool by comparison of different materials and fabrication methods. There are several different printers and materials available to create 3D-printed TB models for surgical planning and trainee education. Current reports using Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastic generated via fused deposition modeling (FDM) have validated the capacity for 3D-printed models to serve as accurate surgical simulators. Here, a head-to-head comparison of models produced using different materials and fabrication processes was performed to identify superior models for application in skull base surgical training. High-resolution CT scans of normal TBs were used to create stereolithography files with image conversion for application in 3D-printing. The 3D-printed models were constructed using five different materials and four printers, including ABS printed on a MakerBot 2x printer, photopolymerizable polymer (Photo) using the Objet 350 Connex3 Printer, polycarbonate (PC) using the FDM-Fortus 400 mc printer, and two types of photocrosslinkable acrylic resin, white and blue (FLW and FLB, respectively), using the Formlabs Form 2 stereolithography printer. Printed TBs were drilled to assess the haptic experience and recreation of TB anatomy with comparison to the current paradigm of ABS. Surgical drilling demonstrated that FLW models created by FDM as well as PC and Photo models generated using photopolymerization more closely recreated cortical mastoidectomy compared to ABS models. ABS generated odor and did not represent the anatomy accurately. Blue resin performed poorly in simulation, likely due to its dark color and translucent appearance. PC, Photo, and FLW models best replicated surgical drilling and anatomy as compared to ABS and FLB models. These prototypes are reliable simulators for surgical training.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To identify 3D-printed temporal bone (TB) models that most accurately recreate cortical mastoidectomy for use as a training tool by comparison of different materials and fabrication methods.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There are several different printers and materials available to create 3D-printed TB models for surgical planning and trainee education. Current reports using Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastic generated via fused deposition modeling (FDM) have validated the capacity for 3D-printed models to serve as accurate surgical simulators. Here, a head-to-head comparison of models produced using different materials and fabrication processes was performed to identify superior models for application in skull base surgical training.
METHODS
METHODS
High-resolution CT scans of normal TBs were used to create stereolithography files with image conversion for application in 3D-printing. The 3D-printed models were constructed using five different materials and four printers, including ABS printed on a MakerBot 2x printer, photopolymerizable polymer (Photo) using the Objet 350 Connex3 Printer, polycarbonate (PC) using the FDM-Fortus 400 mc printer, and two types of photocrosslinkable acrylic resin, white and blue (FLW and FLB, respectively), using the Formlabs Form 2 stereolithography printer. Printed TBs were drilled to assess the haptic experience and recreation of TB anatomy with comparison to the current paradigm of ABS.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Surgical drilling demonstrated that FLW models created by FDM as well as PC and Photo models generated using photopolymerization more closely recreated cortical mastoidectomy compared to ABS models. ABS generated odor and did not represent the anatomy accurately. Blue resin performed poorly in simulation, likely due to its dark color and translucent appearance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PC, Photo, and FLW models best replicated surgical drilling and anatomy as compared to ABS and FLB models. These prototypes are reliable simulators for surgical training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32363889
doi: 10.1177/0003489420918273
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylic Resins
0
Butadienes
0
Polycarboxylate Cement
0
Polymers
0
Polystyrenes
0
polycarbonate
25766-59-0
ABS resin
9003-56-9
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM