Does the McRoberts' manoeuvre need to start with thigh abduction? An innovative biomechanical study.
Biomechanical
Lumbar curve
McRoberts manoeuvre
Motion capture system
Shoulder dystocia
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2020
04 May 2020
Historique:
received:
18
09
2019
accepted:
16
04
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guidelines and description about the achievement of the McRoberts manoeuvre are discordant, particularly concerning the need for abduction before the beginning of the manoeuvre. We sought to compare the biomechanical efficiency of the McRoberts' manoeuvre, with and without thigh abduction. In a postural comparative study, twenty-three gravidas > 32 weeks of gestational age and not in labour were assessed during three repetitions of two McRoberts' manoeuvre that differed in terms of starting position. For the (i) McRoberts, the legs were initially placed in stirrups; for the (m) McRoberts, the legs were resting on the bed, with thighs in wide abduction. For each manoeuvre, flexion of the plane of the external conjugate of the pelvis on the spine (ANGce), hip flexion and abduction, were assessed using an optoelectronic motion capture system. Lumbar curve were assessed with Epionics Spine® system. Temporal parameters including movement duration or acceleration of the external conjugate were also computed. All values obtained for the two types of manoeuvres were compared using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05. The starting position of McRoberts' otherwise had no effect on the maximum ANGce (p = 0.199), the minimal lordosis of the lumbar curve (p = 0.474), or the maximal hip flexion (p = 0.057). The other parameters were not statistically different according to the starting position (p > 0.005). Regardless of the starting position, the McRoberts' manoeuvre allows ascension of the pubic symphysis and reduction of the lumbar lordosis. This results imply that the McRoberts' manoeuvre could be performed with the legs initially placed in the stirrups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Guidelines and description about the achievement of the McRoberts manoeuvre are discordant, particularly concerning the need for abduction before the beginning of the manoeuvre. We sought to compare the biomechanical efficiency of the McRoberts' manoeuvre, with and without thigh abduction.
METHODS
METHODS
In a postural comparative study, twenty-three gravidas > 32 weeks of gestational age and not in labour were assessed during three repetitions of two McRoberts' manoeuvre that differed in terms of starting position. For the (i) McRoberts, the legs were initially placed in stirrups; for the (m) McRoberts, the legs were resting on the bed, with thighs in wide abduction. For each manoeuvre, flexion of the plane of the external conjugate of the pelvis on the spine (ANGce), hip flexion and abduction, were assessed using an optoelectronic motion capture system. Lumbar curve were assessed with Epionics Spine® system. Temporal parameters including movement duration or acceleration of the external conjugate were also computed. All values obtained for the two types of manoeuvres were compared using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The starting position of McRoberts' otherwise had no effect on the maximum ANGce (p = 0.199), the minimal lordosis of the lumbar curve (p = 0.474), or the maximal hip flexion (p = 0.057). The other parameters were not statistically different according to the starting position (p > 0.005).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of the starting position, the McRoberts' manoeuvre allows ascension of the pubic symphysis and reduction of the lumbar lordosis. This results imply that the McRoberts' manoeuvre could be performed with the legs initially placed in the stirrups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32366292
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02952-6
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-02952-6
pmc: PMC7197156
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
264Subventions
Organisme : Fondation Leenaards
ID : Translational research
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;176(3):656-61
pubmed: 9077624
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Apr 1;145(7):882-4
pubmed: 6837666
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):e123-e133
pubmed: 28426618
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;46(2):189-195
pubmed: 28403977
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Sep;76(9):817-20
pubmed: 5823681
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;95(1):43-7
pubmed: 10636500