Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data.
Bariatric surgery
Gastric banding
Gastric bypass
Postoperative complications
Sleeve gastrectomy
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
6
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data about incidence and severity of reoperations up to 6 months after bariatric surgery are currently limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of reoperations after initial bariatric surgical procedures and to compare this between the 3 most frequent current surgical procedures (sleeve, gastric bypass, gastric banding). Nationwide observational cohort study using data from French Hospital Information System (2013-2015) to evaluate incidence and severity of reoperations within 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) of longitudinal comparison between historical propensity-matched cohorts were estimated from a Fine and Gray's model using competing risk of death. Cumulative reoperation rates increased from postoperative day-30 to day-180. Consequently, 31.1 to 90.0% of procedures would have been missed if the reoperation rate was based solely on a 30-day follow-up. Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric bypass than after sleeve (HR 0.64; IC 95% [0.53-0.77]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.65; IC 95% [0.53-0.78]). Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric banding than after sleeve (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.09]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.10]). Cumulative incidence of reoperations increased from 30 days to 6 months after sleeve, gastric bypass, or gastric banding and corresponded to moderate-risk surgical procedures. Consequently, 30-day reoperation rate should no longer be considered when evaluating complications and surgical performance after bariatric surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Data about incidence and severity of reoperations up to 6 months after bariatric surgery are currently limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of reoperations after initial bariatric surgical procedures and to compare this between the 3 most frequent current surgical procedures (sleeve, gastric bypass, gastric banding).
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Nationwide observational cohort study using data from French Hospital Information System (2013-2015) to evaluate incidence and severity of reoperations within 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) of longitudinal comparison between historical propensity-matched cohorts were estimated from a Fine and Gray's model using competing risk of death.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Cumulative reoperation rates increased from postoperative day-30 to day-180. Consequently, 31.1 to 90.0% of procedures would have been missed if the reoperation rate was based solely on a 30-day follow-up. Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric bypass than after sleeve (HR 0.64; IC 95% [0.53-0.77]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.65; IC 95% [0.53-0.78]). Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric banding than after sleeve (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.09]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.10]).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Cumulative incidence of reoperations increased from 30 days to 6 months after sleeve, gastric bypass, or gastric banding and corresponded to moderate-risk surgical procedures. Consequently, 30-day reoperation rate should no longer be considered when evaluating complications and surgical performance after bariatric surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32367174
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04570-9
pii: 10.1007/s11695-020-04570-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3378-3386Références
Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19
Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker D, et al. Association of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs usual care obesity management with all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2018;319:279–90.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20513
Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000431
Brunaud L, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, et al. Health care institutions volume is significantly associated with postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:923–31.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2969-y
Caiazzo R, Baud G, Clement G, et al. Impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;268:831–7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002949
Campos GM, Khoraki J, Browning MG, Pessoa BM, Mazzini GS, Wolfe L. Changes in utilization of bariatric surgery in the United States from 1993 to 2016. Ann Surg. 2019;Aug 13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003554 . [Epub ahead of print].
Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs nonaccredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.032
Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.755
Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.009
Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705
Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, et al. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2018;268:22–7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002613
Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0639-7
Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, et al. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.006
Brunaud L, Payet C, Lifante JC, et al. Regarding manuscript “impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality”. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e47–8.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003113
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Armoiry X, Obadia JF, Pascal L, et al. Comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a nationwide study in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1017–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.092
Haviari S, Chollet F, Polazzi S, Payet C, Beauveil A, Colin C, et al. Effect of data validation audit on hospital mortality ranking and pay for performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008039 .
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83
Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2018;14:1276–82.
Bohnen JD, Mavros MN, Ramly EP, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1119–25.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001906
Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325–8.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904133
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:511–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.015
Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.
doi: 10.1002/pst.433
Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate: a nationwide study on administrative data on 53,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:439–45.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001879
Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1602–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.010
Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–91.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-060116-022805
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–355.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897
Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–54.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20313
Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, et al. Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:431–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.12.035
Musella M, Vitiello A. Comment on: rates of reoperation and intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:e9–10.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.02.014
Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011
Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2273–84.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2101-8
Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4/epdf/abstract .
Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000482
Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:880–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.059
Fysekidis M, Catheline JM. Are guidelines for standardized outcome reporting in bariatric surgery responsible for missing the big picture in bariatric surgery related major complications? Ann Surg. 2018;268:e12–e3.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002314
Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare expenditures after laparoscopic gastric band surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:835–42.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093
Rios-Diaz AJ, Metcalfe D, Devin CL, Berger A, Palazzo F. Six-month readmissions after bariatric surgery: results of a nationwide analysis. Surgery. 2019;Aug 6. pii: S0039–6060(19)30341–1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.003 . [Epub ahead of print].
Payet C, Lifante JC, Carty MJ, et al. Methodological quality of surgical mortality studies using large hospital databases: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1113–8.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002119