Angiography-based quantitative coronary contrast-flow ratio measurements correlate with myocardial ischemia assessed by stress MRI.
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Ventricular Function, Left
Computational fluid dynamics
Coronary artery disease
Non-invasive imaging
Quantitative coronary angiography
Stress MRI
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2020
accepted:
16
04
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR) is a new technology for quantitative evaluation of coronary stenosis using computational fluid dynamics based on angiograms. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of cQFR to detect myocardial ischemia using stress magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard. Patients who received stress MRI and coronary angiography were selected from the hospital database. Relevant ischemia on stress MRI was defined as a perfusion deficit in ≥ 2 of 16 segments. cQFR was quantitated based on 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography using QAngio XA3D1.1 software by two blinded and independent investigators. A cQFR of ≤ 0.80 was considered abnormal. Among 87 patients 230 vessels met the criteria for full analysis by cQFR (88%). In vascular territories with a significant perfusion deficit, cQFR was significantly lower compared to areas with normal perfusion (0.72 (0.62-0.78) vs. 0.96 (0.89-0.99); p < 0.001). The sensitivity of cQFR in detecting significant epicardial stenoses of coronary vessels with documented ischemia in stress MRI was 81% (68-90%), the specificity was 88% (82-92%). Diameter stenoses (DS) and area stenoses (AS) in vessels with positive stress MRI were significantly higher than in vessels without ischemia (DS 59.1% (49.4-68.4%) vs. 34.8% (27.1-46.1%) p < 0.001; AS 75.6% (63.0-85.2%) vs. 45.0% (30.8-63.6%), p < 0.001). The analysis reveals a high correlation between coronary stenosis measured by cQFR and ischemic areas detected by stress MRI. The data set the stage to plan randomized studies assessing cQFR measurements with regard to clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32367188
doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01855-z
pii: 10.1007/s10554-020-01855-z
pmc: PMC7381441
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1407-1416Références
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Oct;283(4):H1462-70
pubmed: 12234798
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;120(11):1913-1919
pubmed: 29050683
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1465-71
pubmed: 16720685
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;36(3):395-402
pubmed: 31745744
Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1379-83
pubmed: 10736280
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May;1(3):282-93
pubmed: 19356440
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;7(6):593-604
pubmed: 24925328
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035
pubmed: 27712739
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087
pubmed: 29101020
Circulation. 2009 Dec 1;120(22):2207-13
pubmed: 19917885
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 7;50(6):514-22
pubmed: 17678734
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):
pubmed: 29980523
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Oct;44(11):1888-1896
pubmed: 28685228
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;279:12-17
pubmed: 30545620
N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8
pubmed: 8637515
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1305-1312
pubmed: 28642995
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2418-2428
pubmed: 31216398
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24
pubmed: 19144937
Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1881-95
pubmed: 22527375
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2337-9
pubmed: 23194945
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 30;:
pubmed: 31886479
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259
pubmed: 29785878
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):768-77
pubmed: 25060020