Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Consistency Between the Traditional and Mixed Decoction of Maimendong Decoction by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Quadrupole with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS)-Based Chemical Profiling Approach.
Journal
Journal of chromatographic science
ISSN: 1945-239X
Titre abrégé: J Chromatogr Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0173225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
02
2018
revised:
30
08
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
1
4
2021
entrez:
8
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Take Maimendong Decoction (MMDD), one of the Chinese classic herbal formulas, as an object to evaluate the chemical consistency between traditional decoction and mixed decoction. The ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole with time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based chemical profiling approach has been utilized. A total of 48 major peaks are detected from these two decoctions under the present chromatographic and mass spectrometry conditions. The results of negative ion mode show nine significant inconsistencies. Liquiritin, ginsenoside Ro and ginsenoside Rg5/Rk1 are detected with higher intensity in traditional preparation sample than the mixed decoction, while licoisoflavone A is higher in mixed decoction samples than the traditional one. The mechanisms involved in the chemical changes were assumed to be anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress and so on, suggesting these two different preparation approaches of MMDD may lead to a possibility of discrepant clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32378713
pii: 5831341
doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bmz104
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drugs, Chinese Herbal
0
Flavanones
0
Ginsenosides
0
Glucosides
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
549-561Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.