Nuclear magnetic resonance-based plasma metabolomics revealed the protective effect of tea polyphenols on sulfur mustard-induced injury in rats.
Biomarker
Metabolomics
NMR
Sulfur mustard
Tea polyphenols
Journal
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
ISSN: 1873-264X
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Biomed Anal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309336
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2020
15 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
01
12
2019
revised:
18
03
2020
accepted:
22
03
2020
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
30
3
2021
entrez:
8
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tea polyphenols (TP) are the major antioxidant components from tea, which could be beneficial to oxidative stress injury, such as sulfur mustard (SM) exposure. However, the holistic efficacy of TP on SM poisoning remains unexplored and needs further investigation. In this study, Nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)-based metabolomics along with multivariate statistical analysis was used to explore the metabolic alteration after SM injury and the protective mechanism of TP. Thirteen potential plasma biomarkers of SM injury were identified, which primarily related to synthesis of ketone bodies, arginine and proline metabolism, butanoate metabolism and alanine aspartate and glutamate metabolism. After TP pre-treatment, the biomarkers were mostly restored to normal levels, which suggested that TP provided effective protection against SM injury and might play its role by rebalancing disordered metabolism pathways. This work enhanced our comprehension of the metabolic profiling of SM injury and revealed the protective mechanism of TP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32380352
pii: S0731-7085(19)32921-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113278
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antioxidants
0
Biomarkers
0
Chemical Warfare Agents
0
Polyphenols
0
Protective Agents
0
Tea
0
Mustard Gas
T8KEC9FH9P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113278Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.