Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation.


Journal

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2020
Historique:
received: 06 10 2019
revised: 18 02 2020
pubmed: 13 5 2020
medline: 28 4 2021
entrez: 13 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Does the prevalence of euploid blastocysts differ between patients treated with progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and those treated with conventional ovarian stimulation? The numbers of blastocysts and euploid blastocysts per patient and the number of euploid embryos per injected oocyte are similar for patients undergoing progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and for those undergoing conventional ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist. New approaches to ovarian stimulation have been developed based on the use of drugs administrable by mouth instead of via injections. Attention has been dedicated to progestins to block the LH surge. Previous data regarding the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of good-quality embryos generated in PPOS have demonstrated similar outcomes when compared to conventional ovarian stimulation, even if some concerns regarding the quality of embryos have been advanced. This is a prospective non-inferiority age-matched case-control study. In a period of 6 months, a total of 785 blastocysts from 1867 injected oocytes obtained from 192 patients were available for analysis. Infertile women undergoing IVF and preimplanation genetic testing (PGT) cycles were included. Forty-eight patients were treated with PPOS, and for each of them three age-matched historical controls (n = 144) treated with a GnRH antagonist protocol were selected. PGT was performed according to next-generation sequencing technology. Basal characteristics were similar in the two groups; a substantial similarity of the main outcome measures in the two treatment groups has also been found. The rate of formation of euploid blastocysts per oocyte was 21% in both the two treatment groups. The percentage of patients with euploid embryos and the total number of euploid blastocysts per patient (median and interquartile range, IQR) in the PPOS group were 38.7 (25.5-52.9) and 2 (1.3-3.1), respectively. These figures were not significantly different in women treated with the GnRH antagonist protocol i.e. 42 (28-53.8) and 2.1 (1.3-2.9), respectively. This was a case-control study which may limit the reliability of the main findings. Our results encourage the use of PPOS, especially for oocyte donation, for fertility preservation and for patients in which total freezing of embryos is foreseen, for those expected to be high responders or candidates for preimplantation genetic testing. However, studies aiming to investigate the effect of PPOS on the live birth rate are warranted. None.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32395749
pii: 5836085
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa068
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pharmaceutical Preparations 0
Progestins 0
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone 33515-09-2
Luteinizing Hormone 9002-67-9

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1325-1331

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Antonio La Marca (A)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41123 Modena, Italy.
Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.

Martina Capuzzo (M)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Sandro Sacchi (S)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Maria Giovanna Imbrogno (MG)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Francesca Spinella (F)

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, "GENOMA", Via di Castel Giubileo, 11, 00138 Rome, Italy.

Maria Teresa Varricchio (MT)

Centre For Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Via Portuense, 700, 00149 Rome, Italy.

Maria Giulia Minasi (MG)

Centre For Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Via Portuense, 700, 00149 Rome, Italy.

Pierfrancesco Greco (P)

Centre For Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Via Portuense, 700, 00149 Rome, Italy.

Francesco Fiorentino (F)

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, "GENOMA", Via di Castel Giubileo, 11, 00138 Rome, Italy.

Ermanno Greco (E)

Centre For Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Via Portuense, 700, 00149 Rome, Italy.
UniCamillus, 00131 Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH