Alternative mRNA splicing can attenuate the pathogenicity of presumed loss-of-function variants in BRCA2.
BRCA2 variants
alternative mRNA splicing
breast cancer risk
functional assays
homology directed repair
Journal
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
ISSN: 1530-0366
Titre abrégé: Genet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815831
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
16
04
2020
revised:
07
04
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
14
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current interpretation guidelines for germline variants in high-risk cancer susceptibility genes consider predicted loss-of-function (LoF) variants, such as nonsense variants and variants in the canonical splice site sequences ofBRCA2, to be associated with high cancer risk. However, some variant alleles produce alternative transcripts that encode (partially) functional protein isoforms leading to possible incorrect risk estimations. For accurate classification of variants it is therefore essential that alternative transcripts are identified and functionally characterized. We systematically evaluated a large panel of human BRCA2 variants for the production of alternative transcripts and assessed their capacity to exert BRCA2 protein functionality. Evaluated variants included all single-exon deletions, various multiple-exon deletions, intronic variants at the canonical splice donor and acceptor sequences, and variants that previously have been shown to affect messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing in carriers. Multiple alternative transcripts encoding (partially) functional protein isoforms were identified (e.g., ∆[E4-E7], ∆[E6-E7], ∆E[6q39_E8], ∆[E10], ∆[E12], ∆E[12-14]). Expression of these transcripts did attenuate the impact of predicted LoF variants such as the canonical splice site variants c.631+2T>G, c.517-2A>G, c.6842-2A>G, c.6937+1G>A, and nonsense variants c.491T>A, c.581G>A, and c.6901G>T. These results allow refinement of variant interpretation guidelines for BRCA2 by providing insight into the functional consequences of naturally occurring and variant-related alternative splicing events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32398771
doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0814-5
pii: S1098-3600(21)00695-X
pmc: PMC7394881
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
RNA Splice Sites
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1355-1365Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Biswas K, Das R, Alter BP, et al. A comprehensive functional characterization of BRCA2 variants associated with Fanconi anemia using mouse ES cell-based assay. Blood. 2011;118:2430–2442.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324541
de la Hoya M, Soukarieh O, Lopez-Perolio I, et al. Combined genetic and splicing analysis of BRCA1 c.[594-2A>C; 641A>G] highlights the relevance of naturally occurring in-frame transcripts for developing disease gene variant classification algorithms. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:2256–2268.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw094
Li L, Biswas K, Habib LA, et al. Functional redundancy of exon 12 of BRCA2 revealed by a comprehensive analysis of the c.6853A>G (p.I2285V) variant. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1543–1550.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21101
Seo A, Steinberg-Shemer O, Unal S, et al. Mechanism for survival of homozygous nonsense mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:5241–5246.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801796115
Thirthagiri E, Klarmann KD, Shukla AK, et al. BRCA2 minor transcript lacking exons 4-7 supports viability in mice and may account for survival of humans with a pathogenic biallelic mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:1934–1945.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw066
Wang Y, Bernhardy AJ, Cruz C, et al. The BRCA1-Delta11q alternative splice isoform bypasses germline mutations and promotes therapeutic resistance to PARP inhibition and cisplatin. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2778–2790.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0186
Meulemans L, Mesman RLS, Caputo SM, et al. Skipping Nonsense to Maintain Function: The Paradigm of BRCA2 Exon 12. Cancer Res. 2020;80:1374–1386.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2491
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30
Abou Tayoun AN, Pesaran T, DiStefano MT, et al. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1517–1524.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23626
Colombo M, Blok MJ, Whiley P, et al. Comprehensive annotation of splice junctions supports pervasive alternative splicing at the BRCA1 locus: a report from the ENIGMA consortium. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:3666–3680.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu075
Fackenthal JD, Yoshimatsu T, Zhang B, et al. Naturally occurring BRCA2 alternative mRNA splicing events in clinically relevant samples. J Med Genet. 2016;53:548–558.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103570
Acedo A, Sanz DJ, Duran M, et al. Comprehensive splicing functional analysis of DNA variants of the BRCA2 gene by hybrid minigenes. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R87.
doi: 10.1186/bcr3202
Borg A, Haile RW, Malone KE, et al. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:E1200–E1240.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21202
Brandao RD, van Roozendaal K, Tserpelis D, Gomez Garcia E, Blok MJ. Characterisation of unclassified variants in the BRCA1/2 genes with a putative effect on splicing. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:971–982.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1599-7
Brandao RD, Mensaert K, Lopez-Perolio I, et al. Targeted RNA-seq successfully identifies normal and pathogenic splicing events in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility and Lynch syndrome genes. Int J Cancer. 2019;145:401–414.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32114
Chen X, Truong TT, Weaver J, et al. Intronic alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: effect on mRNA splicing fidelity and expression. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:427–435.
doi: 10.1002/humu.20319
Claes K, Poppe B, Machackova E, et al. Differentiating pathogenic mutations from polymorphic alterations in the splice sites of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003;37:314–320.
doi: 10.1002/gcc.10221
Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Caleca L, et al. Comparative in vitro and in silico analyses of variants in splicing regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and characterization of novel pathogenic mutations. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57173.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057173
Fraile-Bethencourt E, Valenzuela-Palomo A, Diez-Gomez B, Caloca MJ, Gomez-Barrero S, Velasco EA. Minigene splicing assays identify 12 spliceogenic variants of BRCA2 exons 14 and 15. Front Genet. 2019;10:503.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00503
Sanz DJ, Acedo A, Infante M, et al. A high proportion of DNA variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with aberrant splicing in breast/ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1957–1967.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2564
Thomassen M, Blanco A, Montagna M, et al. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing variants: a collaborative report by ENIGMA consortium members. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:1009–1023.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1674-0
Mesman RLS, Calleja F, Hendriks G, et al. The functional impact of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Genet Med. 2019;21:293–302.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0052-2
Hendriks G, Morolli B, Calleja FM, et al. An efficient pipeline for the generation and functional analysis of human BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:1382–1391.
pubmed: 25146914
pmcid: 6706860
Bjourson AJ, Cooper JE. Band-stab PCR: a simple technique for the purification of individual PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:4675.
doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4675
Colombo M, Lopez-Perolio I, Meeks HD, et al. The BRCA2 c.68-7T>A variant is not pathogenic: a model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:729–741.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23411
Whiley PJ, de la Hoya M, Thomassen M, et al. Comparison of mRNA splicing assay protocols across multiple laboratories: recommendations for best practice in standardized clinical testing. Clin Chem. 2014;60:341–352.
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210658
Gaildrat P, Krieger S, Di Giacomo D, et al. Multiple sequence variants of BRCA2 exon 7 alter splicing regulation. J Med Genet. 2012;49:609–617.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100965
Anczukow O, Buisson M, Leone M, et al. BRCA2 deep intronic mutation causing activation of a cryptic exon: opening toward a new preventive therapeutic strategy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4903–4909.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1100
Bonatti F, Pepe C, Tancredi M, et al. RNA-based analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene alterations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;170:93–101.
doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.05.005
Houdayer C, Caux-Moncoutier V, Krieger S, et al. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1228–1238.
doi: 10.1002/humu.22101
Montalban G, Bonache S, Moles-Fernandez A, et al. Screening of BRCA1/2 deep intronic regions by targeted gene sequencing identifies the first germline BRCA1 variant causing pseudoexon activation in a patient with breast/ovarian cancer. J Med Genet. 2019;56:63–74.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105606
Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, et al. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:1557–1578.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23818
Brnich SE, Abou Tayoun AN, Couch FJ, et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med. 2019;12:3.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2
Whiley PJ, Guidugli L, Walker LC, et al. Splicing and multifactorial analysis of intronic BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants identifies clinically significant splicing aberrations up to 12 nucleotides from the intron/exon boundary. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:678–687.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21495
Lindor NM, Guidugli L, Wang X, et al. A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Hum Mutat. 2012;33:8–21.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21627
Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, et al. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1282–1291.
doi: 10.1002/humu.20880
Tavtigian SV, Greenblatt MS, Lesueur F, Byrnes GB, IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group. In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1327–1336.
Vallee MP, Di Sera TL, Nix DA, et al. Adding in silico assessment of potential splice aberration to the integrated evaluation of BRCA gene unclassified variants. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:627–639.
doi: 10.1002/humu.22973
Moghadasi S, Meeks HD, Vreeswijk MP, et al. The BRCA1 c. 5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) intermediate risk variant: breast and ovarian cancer risk estimation and recommendations for clinical management from the ENIGMA consortium. J Med Genet. 2018;55:15–20.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104560
Shimelis H, Mesman RLS, Von Nicolai C, et al. BRCA2 hypomorphic missense variants confer moderate risks of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2789–2799.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2568