First United Kingdom experience of the novel Osia active transcutaneous piezoelectric bone conduction implant.


Journal

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 23 01 2020
accepted: 27 04 2020
pubmed: 15 5 2020
medline: 28 4 2021
entrez: 15 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bone conduction hearing devices are widely used and indicated in cases of conductive, mixed or single-sided deafness where the conventional hearing aids are not indicated or tolerated. This prospective study aims to investigate the surgical and hearing outcomes of a novel active piezoelectric transcutaneous bone conduction device (t-BCD). Prospective data were collected from the first 10 patients who underwent implantation with the t-BCD Osia (Cochlear, Australia) (between Dec 2018 and March 2019) in a tertiary referral centre. The main outcome measures include: surgical outcome, free field speech testing with speech recognition thresholds, audiological gain and patient-reported outcomes including the 'Glasgow Benefit Inventory' (GBI) and the 'Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). The mean length of surgery was 70.6 min (range 50-87, SD = 9.5). Mean skin thickness measured was 5.6 mm (range 4-8, SD = 1.1). There were two post-operative wound infections which settled conservatively. One required revision surgery to thin skin. The average gain in hearing with the implant was + 39.4 dB. Pre-implantation mean unaided SRT was 38.1 dB (SD = 7.8) and the post-implantation mean-aided SRT was 22.7 dB (SD = 4.6) (p = 0.000078). There was improvement in COSI domains. The mean Glasgow disability score dropped from 52% pre-implantation to 20% post-implantation (p = 0.001). This new active t-BCHD provides excellent audiological gain and improvement in speech recognition. Patient-reported outcomes have also been very positive. The surgery was straightforward with no major surgical complications reported. Further studies will be required to examine long-term outcomes in larger number of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32405815
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06022-7
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-06022-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2995-3002

Références

de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2011) Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. Laryngoscope 121(3):613–616
doi: 10.1002/lary.21167
Wazen JJ, Spitzer JB, Ghossaini SN et al (2003) Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3):248–254
doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00527-8
Kim G, Ju HM, Lee SH, Kim HS, Kwon JA, Seo YJ (2017) Efficacy of bone-anchored hearing aids in single-sided deafness: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 38(4):473–483
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001359
Shapiro S, Ramadan J, Cassis A (2018) BAHA skin complications in the pediatric population: systematic review with meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 39(7):865–873
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001877
Steehler MW, Larner SP, Mintz JS, Steehler MK, Lipman SP, Griffith S (2018) A comparison of the operative techniques and the postoperative complications for bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 22(4):368–373
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1613685
Gluth MB, Eager KM, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD (2010) Long-term benefit perception, complications, and device malfunction rate of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation for profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1427–1434
pubmed: 20729779
Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M et al (2015) Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 36(5):834–841
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712
CochlearTM BAHA attract system. https://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/uk/home/discover/baha-boneconductionimplants/baha-attract-system . Accessed 18 July 2019.
MED-EL active vs. passive transcutaneous bone conduction systems. https://www.medel.com/int/show/index/id/1495/title/Active-vs--Passive/ . Accessed 2018 July 2019.
Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WE et al (2014) Indication criteria and outcomes with the bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 124(12):2802–2806
doi: 10.1002/lary.24832
Sprinzl G, Wolf-Magele A (2016) The bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol 41(2):131–143
doi: 10.1111/coa.12484
Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Götze G et al (2015) Functional results after bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(11):3263–3269
doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3403-x
Weiss R, Leinung M, Baumann U, Weißgerber T, Rader T, Stöver T (2017) Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device bonebridge. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(5):2107–2115
doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4434-2
Zernotti ME, Sarasty AB (2015) Active bone conduction prosthesis: bonebridge(TM). Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 19(4):343–348
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564329
Cochlear.com Osia® Implant. https://www.cochlear.com/us/en/home/products-and-accessories/cochlear-osia-system/osia-implant Accessed 9 Apr 2020
Goycoolea M, Ribalta G, Tocornal F et al (2020) Clinical performance of the Osia™ system, a new active osseointegrated implant system. Results of a prospective clinical investigation. Acta Otolaryngol 140(3):212–219
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1691744
McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK (2013) IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ 346:f3012
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3012
Sedrakyan A, Campbell B, Merino JG, Kuntz R, Hirst A, McCulloch P (2016) IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices. BMJ 353:i2372
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2372
Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, Barai I, Orgill DP (2016) PROCESS group. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery: the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg 36:319–323
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.025
Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422
doi: 10.1177/000348949610500601
Dillon H, James A, Ginis J (1997) Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 8:27–43
pubmed: 9046067
Magele A, Schoerg P, Stanek B, Gradl B, Sprinzl GM (2019) Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(9):e0221484
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221484
Weinstein BE (2015) Outcome measurement in audiology: a call to action. Hearing J 68(7):24–26
doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000469512.69675.4f
Denniston AK, Kyte D, Calvert M et al (2014) An introduction to patient reported outcome measures in ophthalmic research. Eye (Lond) 28:637–645
doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.41
Bianchin G, Bonali M, Russo M, Tribi L (2015) Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL 77(1):17–26
doi: 10.1159/000371425
Monini S, Bianchi A, Talamonti R, Atturo F, Filippi C, Barbara M (2017) Patient satisfaction after auditory implant surgery: ten-year experience from a single implanting unit center. Acta Otolaryngol 137(4):389–397
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1258733
Dimitriadis PA, Farr MR, Allam A, Ray J (2016) Three year experience with the cochlear BAHA attract implant: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 16:12
doi: 10.1186/s12901-016-0033-5
McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8

Auteurs

Kimberley Lau (K)

Otolaryngology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK. kimberleylau@doctors.org.uk.
ENT Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK. kimberleylau@doctors.org.uk.

Gianluca Scotta (G)

Otolaryngology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
ENT Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.

Kay Wright (K)

Hearing Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.

Vicki Proctor (V)

Hearing Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.

Larissa Greenwood (L)

Hearing Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.

Moustafa Dawoud (M)

Otolaryngology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
ENT Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.

Jaydip Ray (J)

Otolaryngology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
ENT Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH