Reliability and validity of a Dutch Lymphoedema Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation of the Norman Questionnaire.


Journal

European journal of cancer care
ISSN: 1365-2354
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9301979

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 16 09 2019
revised: 05 02 2020
accepted: 16 04 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 16 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To perform the cross-cultural validation process of the Dutch Norman Questionnaire (NQ), a questionnaire for the detection and characterisation of breast-cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL) using self-reported signs and symptoms. Test-retest reliability and construct (including convergent, divergent and known-groups validity), face and content validity were examined in breast cancer patients with (n = 30) and without (n = 30) lymphoedema. For concurrent validity, first, agreement between the diagnostic item of the NQ and a clinical diagnosis were analysed. Second, correlations between NQ scores and clinical arm volume assessment were tested. Test-retest reliability was found to be strong to very strong (ICC 0.79-0.96) in the lymphoedema group and moderate to very strong ( ICC 0.64-0.99) in the non-lymphoedema group. Seventeen out of 20 hypotheses on convergent and divergent validity were accepted. There was good face, content and known-groups validity as well. For concurrent validity, agreement between evaluation methods was only 0.462. Moderate correlations were found between 6 out of 9 symptom scores (r = 0.422-0.630) of the NQ and clinical assessment. The Dutch NQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the characterisation of BCRL using self-reported signs and symptoms. Only moderate agreement for the detection of BCRL was found.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32410258
doi: 10.1111/ecc.13242
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Pagination

e13242

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Ancukiewicz, M., Miller, C. L., Skolny, M. N., O'Toole, J., Warren, L. E., Jammallo, L. S., … Taghian, A. G. (2012). Comparison of relative versus absolute arm size change as criteria for quantifying breast cancer-related lymphedema: The flaws in current studies and need for universal methodology. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 135(1), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2111-8
Armer, J. M., Radina, M. E., Porock, D., & Culbertson, S. D. (2003). Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms. Nursing Research, 52(6), 370-379. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200311000-00004
Asim, M., Cham, A., Banerjee, S., Nancekivell, R., Dutu, G., McBride, C., … Campbell, I. (2012). Difficulties with defining lymphoedema after axillary dissection for breast cancer. New Zealand Medical Journal, 125(1351), 29-39.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307-310.
Bulley, C., Coutts, F., Blyth, C., Jack, W., Chetty, U., Barber, M., & Tan, C. W. (2014). A Morbidity Screening Tool for identifying fatigue, pain, upper limb dysfunction and lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: A validity study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18(2), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.10.006
Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2010). Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
Cornelissen, A. J. M., Kool, M., Keuter, X. H. A., Heuts, E. M., Piatkowski de Grzymala, A. A., van derHulst, R., & Qiu, S. S. (2018). Quality of Life Questionnaires in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Patients: Review of the Literature. Lymphatic Research and Biology, 16(2), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2017.0046
Damstra, R. J., Halk, A.-B., Damstra, R. J., Halk, B., van denBerg, J. P., Born, Y., … Urgert, M. C. (2017). The Dutch lymphedema guidelines based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and the chronic care model. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 5(5), 756-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.04.012
De Vrieze, T., Gebruers, N., Tjalma, W. A., Nevelsteen, I., Thomis, S., De Groef, A., … Devoogdt, N. (2019). What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil, 33(7), 1221-1232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519835907
De Vrieze, T., Vos, L., Gebruers, N., De Groef, A., Dams, L., Van der Gucht, E., … Devoogdt, N. (2019). Revision of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL): Reliability and Validity. Lymphatic Research and Biology, 17(3), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2018.0025
Devoogdt, N., Lemkens, H., Geraerts, I., Van Nuland, I., Flour, M., Coremans, T., … Van Kampen, M. (2010). A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: Validity and reliability. International Angiology, 29(5), 401-407.
Devoogdt, N., Van Kampen, M., Geraerts, I., Coremans, T., & Christiaens, M. R. (2011). Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): Reliability and validity. Physical Therapy, 91(6), 944-957. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100087
DiSipio, T., Rye, S., Newman, B., & Hayes, S. (2013). Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology, 14(6), 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70076-7
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Dyba, T., Randi, G., Bettio, M., … Bray, F. (2018). Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. European Journal of Cancer, 103, 356-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309
Földi, M. (2012). Földi’s textbook of Lymphology. Munich: Elsevier.
Gandek, B., & Ware, J. E.Jr (1998). Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 953-959.
Gebruers, N., Truijen, S., Engelborghs, S., & De Deyn, P. P. (2007). Volumetric evaluation of upper extremities in 250 healthy persons. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 27(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00708.x
Gebruers, N., Verbelen, H., De Vrieze, T., Coeck, D., & Tjalma, W. (2015). Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(6), 1131-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.014
Gebruers, N., Verbelen, H., De Vrieze, T., Vos, L., Devoogdt, N., Fias, L., & Tjalma, W. (2017). Current and future perspectives on the evaluation, prevention and conservative management of breast cancer related lymphoedema: A best practice guideline. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.035
Hayes, S., Cornish, B., & Newman, B. (2005). Comparison of methods to diagnose lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: 6-month follow-up. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment, 89(3), 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2045-x
Hidding, J. T., Viehoff, P. B., Beurskens, C. H. G., vanLaarhoven, H. W. M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G., & van derWees, P. J. (2016). Measurement properties of instruments for measuring of lymphedema: Systematic review. Physical Therapy, 96(12), 1965-1981. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150412
Klernas, P., Johnsson, A., Horstmann, V., Kristjanson, L. J., & Johansson, K. (2015). Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-Development and investigation of validity and reliability. Quality of Life Research, 24(2), 427-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0783-8
Kootstra, J. J., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E., Rietman, J. S., deVries, J., Baas, P. C., Geertzen, J. H., & Hoekstra, H. J. (2010). A longitudinal comparison of arm morbidity in stage I-II breast cancer patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion lymph node dissection, or axillary lymph node dissection. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 17(9), 2384-2394. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0981-8
Kostanjsek, N. (2011). Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S3
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Levenhagen, K., Davies, C., Perdomo, M., Ryans, K., & Gilchrist, L. (2017). Diagnosis of Upper-Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of APTA. Rehabilitation Oncology, 35(3), E1-E18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000073
Lexell, J. E., & Downham, D. Y. (2005). How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(9), 719-723. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000176452.17771.20
Michelotti, A., Invernizzi, M., Lopez, G., Lorenzini, D., Nesa, F., De Sire, A., & Fusco, N. (2019). Tackling the diversity of breast cancer related lymphedema: Perspectives on diagnosis, risk assessment, and clinical management. Breast, 44, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.009
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., … deVet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Norman, S. A., Miller, L. T., Erikson, H. B., Norman, M. F., & McCorkle, R. (2001). Development and validation of a telephone questionnaire to characterize lymphedema in women treated for breast cancer. Physical Therapy, 81(6), 1192-1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.6.1192
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theroy (2nd, edition ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Organization, W. H. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: Switzerland.
Smoot, B. J., Wong, J. F., & Dodd, M. J. (2011). Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Area under the curve. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(4), 603-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.017
Stubblefield, M. D., & Keole, N. (2013). Upper Body Pain and Functional Disorders in Patients With Breast Cancer. PM&R, 6(2), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.605
Taylor, R., Jayasinghe, U. W., Koelmeyer, L., Ung, O., & Boyages, J. (2006). Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Physical Therapy, 86(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.2.205
Viehoff, P. B., vanGenderen, F. R., & Wittink, H. (2008). Upper limb lymphedema 27 (ULL27): Dutch translation and validation of an illness-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with upper limb lymphedema. Lymphology, 41(3), 131-138.
Warren, A. G., Brorson, H., Borud, L. J., & Slavin, S. A. (2007). Lymphedema: A comprehensive review. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 59(4), 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000257149.42922.7e
Wickstrom, G., & Bendix, T. (2000). The "Hawthorne effect"-what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show?Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 26(4), 363-367.

Auteurs

An De Groef (A)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Tessa De Vrieze (T)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Lore Dams (L)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Frauke Penen (F)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Elien Van der Gucht (E)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Brecht Van Assche (B)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Vincent Verhaeghe (V)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Nele Devoogdt (N)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphoedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH