Radiotherapy is safe in patients with implantable cardiac devices. Analysis of a systematic interrogation follow-up.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Defibrillators, Implantable
/ statistics & numerical data
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Diseases
/ therapy
Humans
Male
Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Pacemaker, Artificial
/ statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, Conformal
/ adverse effects
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Retrospective Studies
CIED
Devices
ICD
Malfunctions
Pacemaker
Radiotherapy
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
accepted:
01
05
2020
pubmed:
19
5
2020
medline:
13
7
2021
entrez:
19
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The number of patients who have a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIEDs) that undergo a course of radiotherapy is increasing due to the ageing population. The majority of clinical studies only evaluate any CIED malfunction at the end of a course of irradiation or in a case of there being symptoms of possible malfunction. As a result, little data has been collected on CIED status acquired during an active course of irradiation. We aimed to evaluate the correct functioning of a CIED during a course of radiotherapy. So, a retrospective analysis was made of all patients having CIEDS in a single institution during their course of radiotherapy. All CIEDs were systematically checked before and during the course of radiotherapy according to the risk of device failure and patient dependence. Data was analysed from 56 patients (43 men, 13 women) with a mean age of 78.2 years, of whom 87.5% of the patients carried a pacemaker (PM), the 39% of the patients were PM dependent, and the remaining patients carried an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). An observable dose of irradiation was evident in only 10 cases. 69.1% of the CIEDs were checked daily and the remainder were checked weekly. During the radiotherapy course, 82% of the patients did not complain of any cardiological event. The CIED of five patients experienced an increase in the threshold and, in another case, a sudden reduction in the duration of the battery was reported. Another patient with a CIED experienced a cardiac insufficiency episode triggered by a ventricular tachycardia. In conclusions, although adverse clinical events from exposure of a CIED to irradiation are rare, they can appear in any group of risk. No dose-dependency was observed on the malfunction of the CIED.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32419111
doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02374-y
pii: 10.1007/s12094-020-02374-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM