Considering Labor After Cesarean in a Woman with Class 3 Obesity.
cesarean birth
intrapartum care
obesity
obstetric complications
vaginal birth after cesarean
Journal
Journal of midwifery & women's health
ISSN: 1542-2011
Titre abrégé: J Midwifery Womens Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909407
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
08
09
2019
revised:
11
03
2020
accepted:
14
03
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
23
3
2021
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Because of the high cesarean rate in the United States, perinatal care providers are increasingly called upon to counsel women considering labor after cesarean. This counseling can be more complicated for women with class 3 obesity, defined as a body mass index at or exceeding 40. Although labor after cesarean may be less likely to result in successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) for this population, the risks of repeat cesarean are also higher for these women. This case report describes the benefits and risks of labor after cesarean, the chance of successful VBAC, and clinical recommendations to aid women in achieving VBAC when class 3 obesity is present.
Substances chimiques
Oxytocics
0
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
382-386Informations de copyright
© 2020 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
Références
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(13):1-47.
Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SF. Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(4):1-13.
American College of Nurse-Midwives. Clinical bulletin: Care for women desiring vaginal birth after cesarean. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;56(5):517-525.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e127.
Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2284-2291.
Machado LS. Cesarean section in morbidly obese parturients: practical implications and complications. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(1):13-18.
Roeckner JT, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. The impact of obesity on operative time and blood loss during cesarean delivery. Gynecol Womens Health Res. 2017;1(1):105.
Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(4):299-304.
Myles TD, Gooch J, Santolaya J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(5 pt 1):959-964.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 156: Obesity in pregnancy [corrected in Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1450]. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):e112-e126 (reaffirmed 2019).
Guise J, McDonagh MS, Nygren P, Chan BK, Osterweil P, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous cesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):19-25.
Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):125-133.
Tonidandel A, Booth J, D'Angelo R, Harris L, Tonidandel S. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23(4):357-364.
Goodall PT, Ahn JT, Chapa JB, Hibbard JU. Obesity as a risk factor for failed trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1423-1426.
Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):360.
Wilson E, Sivanesan K, Veerasingham M. Rates of vaginal birth after cesarean section: what chance do obese women have? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(1):88-92.
Mei JY, Havard AJ, Mularz AJ, Maykin MM, Gaw SL. Impact of obesity class on trial of labor after cesarean success: does pre-pregnancy or at-delivery obesity status matter? J Perinatol. 2019;39(8):1042-1049.
Carlson NS, Hernandez TL, Hurt KJ. Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:135.
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806-812.
Maykin MM, Mularz AJ, Lee LK, Valderramos SG. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery reveals unexpected success in a diverse American population. AJP Rep. 2017;7(1):e31-e38.
Thornton P. Limitations of vaginal birth after cesarean success prediction. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(1):115-120.
Rosenstein MG, Kuppermann M, Gregorich SE, Cottrell EK, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1010-1017.
Smith DC, Phillippi JC, Lowe NK, et al. Using the Robson 10-group classification system to compare cesarean birth utilization between US centers with and without midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(1):10-21.