Key factors affecting ammonium production by an Azotobacter vinelandii strain deregulated for biological nitrogen fixation.
Ammonium
Azotobacter vinelandii
Nitrogen fixation
Optimization
nifLA
Journal
Microbial cell factories
ISSN: 1475-2859
Titre abrégé: Microb Cell Fact
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139812
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2020
19 May 2020
Historique:
received:
20
01
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
entrez:
21
5
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The obligate aerobe Azotobacter vinelandii is a model organism for the study of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). This bacterium regulates the process of BNF through the two component NifL and NifA system, where NifA acts as an activator, while NifL acts as an anti-activator based on various metabolic signals within the cell. Disruption of the nifL component in the nifLA operon in a precise manner results in a deregulated phenotype that produces levels of ammonium that far surpass the requirements within the cell, and results in the release of up to 30 mM of ammonium into the growth medium. While many studies have probed the factors affecting growth of A. vinelandii, the features important to maximizing this high-ammonium-releasing phenotype have not been fully investigated. In this work, we report the effect of temperature, medium composition, and oxygen requirements on sustaining and maximizing elevated levels of ammonium production from a nitrogenase deregulated strain. We further investigated several pathways, including ammonium uptake through the transporter AmtB, which could limit yields through energy loss or futile recycling steps. Following optimization, we compared sugar consumption and ammonium production, to attain correlations and energy requirements to drive this process in vivo. Ammonium yields indicate that between 5 and 8% of cellular protein is fully active nitrogenase MoFe protein (NifDK) under these conditions. These findings provide important process optimization parameters, and illustrate that further improvements to this phenotype can be accomplished by eliminating futile cycles.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The obligate aerobe Azotobacter vinelandii is a model organism for the study of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). This bacterium regulates the process of BNF through the two component NifL and NifA system, where NifA acts as an activator, while NifL acts as an anti-activator based on various metabolic signals within the cell. Disruption of the nifL component in the nifLA operon in a precise manner results in a deregulated phenotype that produces levels of ammonium that far surpass the requirements within the cell, and results in the release of up to 30 mM of ammonium into the growth medium. While many studies have probed the factors affecting growth of A. vinelandii, the features important to maximizing this high-ammonium-releasing phenotype have not been fully investigated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this work, we report the effect of temperature, medium composition, and oxygen requirements on sustaining and maximizing elevated levels of ammonium production from a nitrogenase deregulated strain. We further investigated several pathways, including ammonium uptake through the transporter AmtB, which could limit yields through energy loss or futile recycling steps. Following optimization, we compared sugar consumption and ammonium production, to attain correlations and energy requirements to drive this process in vivo. Ammonium yields indicate that between 5 and 8% of cellular protein is fully active nitrogenase MoFe protein (NifDK) under these conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These findings provide important process optimization parameters, and illustrate that further improvements to this phenotype can be accomplished by eliminating futile cycles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32429912
doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01362-9
pii: 10.1186/s12934-020-01362-9
pmc: PMC7238568
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ammonium Compounds
0
Culture Media
0
Transcription Factors
0
Nitrogenase
EC 1.18.6.1
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107Subventions
Organisme : NIFA
ID : MIN-12-081
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : CBET-1437758
Organisme : MnDRIVE
ID : MnDrive 12
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : 2020-67019-31148
Références
Metab Eng. 2014 May;23:154-64
pubmed: 24680860
J Bacteriol. 2009 Jul;191(14):4534-45
pubmed: 19429624
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Dec;102(23):10315-10325
pubmed: 30250977
Biochemistry. 1983 Oct 25;22(22):5111-22
pubmed: 6360203
J Bacteriol. 1998 Jun;180(12):3260-4
pubmed: 9620984
J Bacteriol. 1985 Aug;163(2):528-33
pubmed: 4019408
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1;43(19):7218-24
pubmed: 19848125
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Jul;81(13):4316-28
pubmed: 25888177
Bacteriol Rev. 1954 Dec;18(4):195-214
pubmed: 13219046
J Bacteriol. 2011 Sep;193(17):4477-86
pubmed: 21724999
Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:231-57
pubmed: 6383195
Metab Eng. 2017 Mar;40:59-68
pubmed: 28089747
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Feb;57(2):622-4
pubmed: 16348426
Biochem J. 1988 Dec 1;256(2):429-32
pubmed: 3223922
FEBS Lett. 2007 May 25;581(12):2301-8
pubmed: 17397837
J Biol Chem. 1953 Sep;204(1):445-51
pubmed: 13084615
J Bacteriol. 2014 Feb;196(3):595-603
pubmed: 24244007
J Biol Chem. 2004 Dec 17;279(51):53621-4
pubmed: 15465817
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 May;58(5):1711-8
pubmed: 1622243
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Oct;58(4):1343-50
pubmed: 5237869
J Bacteriol. 1981 May;146(2):512-6
pubmed: 7217009
Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Feb;34(Pt 1):162-4
pubmed: 16417511
J Bacteriol. 1989 Jun;171(6):3162-7
pubmed: 2722744
Can J Microbiol. 1968 Jan;14(1):25-31
pubmed: 5644401
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;77(2):395-9
pubmed: 21057013
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;766:81-92
pubmed: 21833862
Dalton Trans. 2006 May 21;(19):2277-84
pubmed: 16688314
J Bacteriol. 2004 Feb;186(3):601-10
pubmed: 14729684
Chem Rev. 1996 Nov 7;96(7):2983-3012
pubmed: 11848849
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Sep 29;83(20):
pubmed: 28802272
Biochemistry. 2009 Sep 29;48(38):9094-102
pubmed: 19663502
Biochem J. 1991 Jul 15;277 ( Pt 2):465-8
pubmed: 1859374
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(7):2345-52
pubmed: 22267660
Nat Microbiol. 2016 May 09;1(6):16055
pubmed: 27572840
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74(5):1098-101
pubmed: 20460702
J Gen Physiol. 1932 May 20;15(5):497-505
pubmed: 19872661
ISME J. 2017 Jan;11(1):166-175
pubmed: 27740611
Biochem J. 1993 Jan 15;289 ( Pt 2):395-400
pubmed: 8424785
Science. 2002 Sep 6;297(5587):1654-5
pubmed: 12215632
J Bacteriol. 1999 Dec;181(23):7356-62
pubmed: 10572141
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Feb;104(4):1383-1399
pubmed: 31879824
J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Jun;120(6):1595-604
pubmed: 26854474
Bacteriol Rev. 1954 Dec;18(4):254-74
pubmed: 13219049