Bone regenerative medicine: metatarsus defects in sheep to evaluate new therapeutic strategies for human long bone defect. A systematic review.
Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7
Bone Regeneration
Fractures, Bone
/ therapy
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
/ cytology
Metatarsus
/ injuries
Models, Animal
Platelet-Rich Plasma
Regenerative Medicine
Sheep
Tissue Engineering
Transplantation, Homologous
Animal model
In vivo studies
Metatarsus
Regenerative medicine
Scaffolds
Sheep
Tissue engineering
Journal
Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
19
11
2019
revised:
01
04
2020
accepted:
08
04
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
19
3
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Large bone defects in long bone are not able to repair themselves and require grafts. Although autograft is the gold standard, it is associated with some disadvantages. Consequently, the application of tissue engineering (TE) techniques help with the use of allogenic biological and artificial scaffolds, cells and growth factors (GFs). Following 3Rs and in vitro testing strategies, animal models are required in preclinical in vivo studies to evaluate the therapeutic effects of the most promising TE techniques. A systematic review was performed from 2000 to 2019 to evaluate bone regeneration sheep metatarsus defects. Eleven in vivo studies on sheep metatarsus defect were retrieved. The mid-diaphysis of metatarsus was the region most employed to perform critical size defects. Natural, synthetic and hybrid scaffolds were implanted, combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), GFs such as osteogenic protein 1 (OP1) and platelet rich plasma (PRP). The maximum follow-up period was 4 and 6 months in which radiography, histology, histomorphometry, computed tomography (CT) and biomechanics were performed to evaluate the healing status. the sheep metatarsus defect model seems to be a suitable environment with a good marriage of biological and biomechanical properties. Defects of 3 cm are treated with natural scaffolds (homologous graft or allografts), those of 2.5 cm with natural, synthetic or composite scaffolds, while little defects (0.5 × 0.5 cm) with composite scaffolds. No difference in results is found regardless of the defect size.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430197
pii: S0020-1383(20)30341-7
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.010
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1457-1467Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.