An Investigation of the Effect of Modifying and Reusing Impression Copings on Transfer of Implant Analog Position and Angulation.


Journal

The journal of contemporary dental practice
ISSN: 1526-3711
Titre abrégé: J Contemp Dent Pract
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101090552

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez: 22 5 2020
pubmed: 22 5 2020
medline: 23 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this research was to determine whether sterilization and reutilization of impression copings had an impact on the accuracy of casts made for multiimplant restorations. Four master casts embedded with five implant analogs were fabricated. Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions of the master cast with copings attached to the analogs were made and poured in dental stone. The impression copings were subjected to cleaning and sterilization. These processes were repeated 30 cycles for each of the two groups of five impression copings: one without modification and one with modification that included air abrasion and PVS adhesive. A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used to measure relative angles and distances between the reference analog and analogs. The relative angles and distances measured on the stone casts were compared to the master resin cast to obtain positional and angular displacements. For impression copings that were not modified, a significant difference was detected for both positional and angular displacements. For impression copings that were modified, a significant change was observed only for positional displacement. The maximum discrepancies measured for positional and angular displacements after 30 cycles of reuse were only 81 μm and 0.46°, respectively, regardless of the modification. Within the limitations of this study, unmodified impression copings that have undergone 30 cycles of cleaning and sterilization appeared to incur more impression inaccuracy than those impression copings that were modified by airborne-particle abrasion and PVS adhesive. Impression copings used in this study can likely be recycled up to 30 times without reducing the accuracy of the impression to a level that may be considered clinically significant.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32434964
pii: 1526-3711-2524

Substances chimiques

Dental Cements 0
Dental Impression Materials 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

220-226

Auteurs

Francisco F Gallardo (FF)

USAF Prosthodontics, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency, Joint-Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA.

Cade A Salmon (CA)

USAF Prosthodontics Residency, Joint-Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA.

Wen Lien (W)

USAF Dental Research and Consultation Service, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.

Ryan R Sheridan (RR)

USAF Prosthodontics Residency, Joint-Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA.

Richard C Batzer (RC)

USAF Prosthodontics Residency, Joint-Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA.

Kraig S Vandewalle (KS)

USAF Research, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency, Joint-Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, USA, Phone: +1 210 292 0760, e-mail: kraig.s.vandewalle.civ@mail.mil.

Articles similaires

Humans COVID-19 Male Female Adult

Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations.

Lucas Eigi Borges Tanaka, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tércio Vieira Grangeiro et al.
1.00
Composite Resins Materials Testing Printing, Three-Dimensional Surface Properties Flexural Strength
Humans Male Female Adult Middle Aged

3D-printed tooth for caries excavation.

Lisanne Carnier, Michael Del Hougne, Marc Schmitter et al.
1.00
Humans Printing, Three-Dimensional Dental Caries X-Ray Microtomography Dental Cavity Preparation

Classifications MeSH