Flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression levels in the newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the effect of chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease, refractory disease and relapsed disease: an implication for anti-CD38 immunotherapy.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
accepted: 20 04 2020
entrez: 23 5 2020
pubmed: 23 5 2020
medline: 18 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Mab) therapy has become a focus of attention as an additional/alternative option for many hematological neoplasms including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). It has been shown that antitumor efficacy of anti-CD38-Mab depends on the level of CD38 expression on tumor cells. Reports on CD38 expression in T-ALL are scarce, and data on the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on CD38 expression are limited to very few samples. Moreover, it lacks entirely in refractory disease and in adult T-ALL. We report the flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression in T-ALL blasts at diagnosis and the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease (MRD), refractory disease (MRD≥5%), and relapsed disease in a large cohort of T-ALL. The study included 347 samples (188 diagnostic, 100 MRD, 24 refractory and 35 relapse samples) from 196 (children: 85; adolescents/adults: 111) patients with T-ALL. CD38-positive blasts percentages (CD38-PBPs) and expression-intensity (mean fluorescent intensity, CD38-MFI) were studied using multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). MFC-based MRD was performed at the end-of-induction (EOI-MRD, day 30-35) and end-of-consolidation (EOC-MRD, day 78-85) subsequent follow-up (SFU-MRD) points. Patients were classified into early thymic precursor subtype of T-ALL (ETPALL, 54/188, 28.7%), and non-ETPALL (134/188, 71.3%). Of 188, EOI-MRD assessment was available in 152, EOC-MRD was available in 96 and SFU-MRD was available in 14 patients. CD38 was found positive in 97.9% (184/188) of diagnostic, 88.7% (110/124) MRD (including 24-refractory) and 82.9% (29/35) relapsed samples. Median (95% CI) of CD38-PBPs/MFI in diagnostic, MRD, refractory, and relapsed T-ALL samples were, respectively, 85.9% (82.10%-89.91%)/4.2 (3.88-4.47), 74.0% (58.87%-83.88%)/4.6 (3.67-6.81), 79.6% (65.25%-96.11%)/4.6 (3.33-8.47) and 85.2% (74.48%-93.01%)/5.6 (4.14-8.99). No significant difference was noted in CD38 expression between pediatric versus adult and patients with ETPALL versus non-ETPALL. No change was observed in CD38-MFI between diagnostic versus MRD and diagnostic versus relapsed paired samples. However, we noticed a mild drop in the CD38-PBPs in MRD samples compared with the diagnostic samples (p=0.016). We report an in-depth analysis of CD38 expression in a large cohort of T-ALL at diagnosis, during chemotherapy, and at relapse. Our data demonstrated that CD38 is robustly expressed in T-ALL blasts with a little effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy making it a potentially effective target for antiCD38-Mab therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Mab) therapy has become a focus of attention as an additional/alternative option for many hematological neoplasms including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). It has been shown that antitumor efficacy of anti-CD38-Mab depends on the level of CD38 expression on tumor cells. Reports on CD38 expression in T-ALL are scarce, and data on the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on CD38 expression are limited to very few samples. Moreover, it lacks entirely in refractory disease and in adult T-ALL. We report the flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression in T-ALL blasts at diagnosis and the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease (MRD), refractory disease (MRD≥5%), and relapsed disease in a large cohort of T-ALL.
METHODS
The study included 347 samples (188 diagnostic, 100 MRD, 24 refractory and 35 relapse samples) from 196 (children: 85; adolescents/adults: 111) patients with T-ALL. CD38-positive blasts percentages (CD38-PBPs) and expression-intensity (mean fluorescent intensity, CD38-MFI) were studied using multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). MFC-based MRD was performed at the end-of-induction (EOI-MRD, day 30-35) and end-of-consolidation (EOC-MRD, day 78-85) subsequent follow-up (SFU-MRD) points.
RESULTS
Patients were classified into early thymic precursor subtype of T-ALL (ETPALL, 54/188, 28.7%), and non-ETPALL (134/188, 71.3%). Of 188, EOI-MRD assessment was available in 152, EOC-MRD was available in 96 and SFU-MRD was available in 14 patients. CD38 was found positive in 97.9% (184/188) of diagnostic, 88.7% (110/124) MRD (including 24-refractory) and 82.9% (29/35) relapsed samples. Median (95% CI) of CD38-PBPs/MFI in diagnostic, MRD, refractory, and relapsed T-ALL samples were, respectively, 85.9% (82.10%-89.91%)/4.2 (3.88-4.47), 74.0% (58.87%-83.88%)/4.6 (3.67-6.81), 79.6% (65.25%-96.11%)/4.6 (3.33-8.47) and 85.2% (74.48%-93.01%)/5.6 (4.14-8.99). No significant difference was noted in CD38 expression between pediatric versus adult and patients with ETPALL versus non-ETPALL. No change was observed in CD38-MFI between diagnostic versus MRD and diagnostic versus relapsed paired samples. However, we noticed a mild drop in the CD38-PBPs in MRD samples compared with the diagnostic samples (p=0.016).
CONCLUSION
We report an in-depth analysis of CD38 expression in a large cohort of T-ALL at diagnosis, during chemotherapy, and at relapse. Our data demonstrated that CD38 is robustly expressed in T-ALL blasts with a little effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy making it a potentially effective target for antiCD38-Mab therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32439800
pii: jitc-2020-000630
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000630
pmc: PMC7247386
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Membrane Glycoproteins 0
CD38 protein, human EC 3.2.2.5
ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1 EC 3.2.2.6

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.

Références

Indian J Cancer. 2018 Jan-Mar;55(1):9-15
pubmed: 30147087
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;140(6):813-8
pubmed: 24225748
Br J Haematol. 2018 Jan;180(2):292-296
pubmed: 27604396
Indian J Cancer. 2017 Oct-Dec;54(4):609-615
pubmed: 30082544
Blood. 2017 Jun 22;129(25):3386-3388
pubmed: 28476749
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Mar;9(Spec Feature):70-3
pubmed: 27668047
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Feb;10(2):147-56
pubmed: 19147408
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2591-601
pubmed: 27269950
Blood. 2016 Apr 14;127(15):1863-9
pubmed: 26747249
Br J Haematol. 2018 Oct;183(2):196-211
pubmed: 30080238
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Feb;60(2):295-301
pubmed: 30033840
Haematologica. 2020 Apr;105(4):1032-1041
pubmed: 31296574
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39416
pubmed: 22761788
Ann Hematol. 2012 Jul;91(7):997-1005
pubmed: 22249209
Drugs. 2019 Mar;79(4):447-454
pubmed: 30830601
Blood. 2018 Mar 1;131(9):995-999
pubmed: 29305553
Oncoimmunology. 2019 May 1;8(8):1607673
pubmed: 31413916
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):43-53
pubmed: 23959396
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jul;41(11):1570-83
pubmed: 16026693
Immunol Rev. 2016 Mar;270(1):95-112
pubmed: 26864107
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 20;9:2134
pubmed: 30294326
Haematologica. 2016 Jun;101(6):732-40
pubmed: 26944475
J Clin Invest. 2012 Oct;122(10):3398-406
pubmed: 23023710
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020 Jan 16;:
pubmed: 31944572
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018 Aug;13(4):265-274
pubmed: 29948644
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):275-284
pubmed: 30795996
Haematologica. 2019 Mar;104(3):e100-e103
pubmed: 30190344
Klin Padiatr. 1994 Jul-Aug;206(4):208-21
pubmed: 7526027
Blood. 2019 Aug 22;134(8):713-716
pubmed: 31311816
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Nov;53(11):1487-1489
pubmed: 29884853
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019 Apr;14(2):83-93
pubmed: 30880359
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405
pubmed: 27069254
Blood. 2020 Jan 16;135(3):159-166
pubmed: 31738819
Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(2):284-293
pubmed: 28771663
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020 Jan;98(1):57-67
pubmed: 31197916
Haematologica. 2011 Feb;96(2):284-90
pubmed: 21109694
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;999:123-36
pubmed: 23666694
Leukemia. 2015 Oct;29(10):2039-49
pubmed: 25975191
Blood. 2016 Aug 18;128(7):959-70
pubmed: 27307294

Auteurs

Prashant Ramesh Tembhare (PR)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India docprt@gmail.com.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Harshini Sriram (H)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Twinkle Khanka (T)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Gaurav Chatterjee (G)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Devasis Panda (D)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sitaram Ghogale (S)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Yajamanam Badrinath (Y)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Nilesh Deshpande (N)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Nikhil V Patkar (NV)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Gaurav Narula (G)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Bhausaheb Bagal (B)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Hasmukh Jain (H)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Manju Sengar (M)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Navin Khattry (N)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Shripad Banavali (S)

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sumeet Gujral (S)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Papagudi G Subramanian (PG)

Hematopathology Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH