Flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression levels in the newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the effect of chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease, refractory disease and relapsed disease: an implication for anti-CD38 immunotherapy.
ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1
/ metabolism
Adolescent
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Flow Cytometry
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Male
Membrane Glycoproteins
/ metabolism
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Neoplasm, Residual
/ drug therapy
Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
/ drug therapy
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Young Adult
antigens, neoplasm
hematologic neoplasms
immunotherapy
receptors, antigen
translational medical research
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
23
5
2020
pubmed:
23
5
2020
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Mab) therapy has become a focus of attention as an additional/alternative option for many hematological neoplasms including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). It has been shown that antitumor efficacy of anti-CD38-Mab depends on the level of CD38 expression on tumor cells. Reports on CD38 expression in T-ALL are scarce, and data on the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on CD38 expression are limited to very few samples. Moreover, it lacks entirely in refractory disease and in adult T-ALL. We report the flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression in T-ALL blasts at diagnosis and the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease (MRD), refractory disease (MRD≥5%), and relapsed disease in a large cohort of T-ALL. The study included 347 samples (188 diagnostic, 100 MRD, 24 refractory and 35 relapse samples) from 196 (children: 85; adolescents/adults: 111) patients with T-ALL. CD38-positive blasts percentages (CD38-PBPs) and expression-intensity (mean fluorescent intensity, CD38-MFI) were studied using multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). MFC-based MRD was performed at the end-of-induction (EOI-MRD, day 30-35) and end-of-consolidation (EOC-MRD, day 78-85) subsequent follow-up (SFU-MRD) points. Patients were classified into early thymic precursor subtype of T-ALL (ETPALL, 54/188, 28.7%), and non-ETPALL (134/188, 71.3%). Of 188, EOI-MRD assessment was available in 152, EOC-MRD was available in 96 and SFU-MRD was available in 14 patients. CD38 was found positive in 97.9% (184/188) of diagnostic, 88.7% (110/124) MRD (including 24-refractory) and 82.9% (29/35) relapsed samples. Median (95% CI) of CD38-PBPs/MFI in diagnostic, MRD, refractory, and relapsed T-ALL samples were, respectively, 85.9% (82.10%-89.91%)/4.2 (3.88-4.47), 74.0% (58.87%-83.88%)/4.6 (3.67-6.81), 79.6% (65.25%-96.11%)/4.6 (3.33-8.47) and 85.2% (74.48%-93.01%)/5.6 (4.14-8.99). No significant difference was noted in CD38 expression between pediatric versus adult and patients with ETPALL versus non-ETPALL. No change was observed in CD38-MFI between diagnostic versus MRD and diagnostic versus relapsed paired samples. However, we noticed a mild drop in the CD38-PBPs in MRD samples compared with the diagnostic samples (p=0.016). We report an in-depth analysis of CD38 expression in a large cohort of T-ALL at diagnosis, during chemotherapy, and at relapse. Our data demonstrated that CD38 is robustly expressed in T-ALL blasts with a little effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy making it a potentially effective target for antiCD38-Mab therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Mab) therapy has become a focus of attention as an additional/alternative option for many hematological neoplasms including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). It has been shown that antitumor efficacy of anti-CD38-Mab depends on the level of CD38 expression on tumor cells. Reports on CD38 expression in T-ALL are scarce, and data on the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on CD38 expression are limited to very few samples. Moreover, it lacks entirely in refractory disease and in adult T-ALL. We report the flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression in T-ALL blasts at diagnosis and the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on its expression in measurable residual disease (MRD), refractory disease (MRD≥5%), and relapsed disease in a large cohort of T-ALL.
METHODS
The study included 347 samples (188 diagnostic, 100 MRD, 24 refractory and 35 relapse samples) from 196 (children: 85; adolescents/adults: 111) patients with T-ALL. CD38-positive blasts percentages (CD38-PBPs) and expression-intensity (mean fluorescent intensity, CD38-MFI) were studied using multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). MFC-based MRD was performed at the end-of-induction (EOI-MRD, day 30-35) and end-of-consolidation (EOC-MRD, day 78-85) subsequent follow-up (SFU-MRD) points.
RESULTS
Patients were classified into early thymic precursor subtype of T-ALL (ETPALL, 54/188, 28.7%), and non-ETPALL (134/188, 71.3%). Of 188, EOI-MRD assessment was available in 152, EOC-MRD was available in 96 and SFU-MRD was available in 14 patients. CD38 was found positive in 97.9% (184/188) of diagnostic, 88.7% (110/124) MRD (including 24-refractory) and 82.9% (29/35) relapsed samples. Median (95% CI) of CD38-PBPs/MFI in diagnostic, MRD, refractory, and relapsed T-ALL samples were, respectively, 85.9% (82.10%-89.91%)/4.2 (3.88-4.47), 74.0% (58.87%-83.88%)/4.6 (3.67-6.81), 79.6% (65.25%-96.11%)/4.6 (3.33-8.47) and 85.2% (74.48%-93.01%)/5.6 (4.14-8.99). No significant difference was noted in CD38 expression between pediatric versus adult and patients with ETPALL versus non-ETPALL. No change was observed in CD38-MFI between diagnostic versus MRD and diagnostic versus relapsed paired samples. However, we noticed a mild drop in the CD38-PBPs in MRD samples compared with the diagnostic samples (p=0.016).
CONCLUSION
We report an in-depth analysis of CD38 expression in a large cohort of T-ALL at diagnosis, during chemotherapy, and at relapse. Our data demonstrated that CD38 is robustly expressed in T-ALL blasts with a little effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy making it a potentially effective target for antiCD38-Mab therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32439800
pii: jitc-2020-000630
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000630
pmc: PMC7247386
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Membrane Glycoproteins
0
CD38 protein, human
EC 3.2.2.5
ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1
EC 3.2.2.6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.
Références
Indian J Cancer. 2018 Jan-Mar;55(1):9-15
pubmed: 30147087
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;140(6):813-8
pubmed: 24225748
Br J Haematol. 2018 Jan;180(2):292-296
pubmed: 27604396
Indian J Cancer. 2017 Oct-Dec;54(4):609-615
pubmed: 30082544
Blood. 2017 Jun 22;129(25):3386-3388
pubmed: 28476749
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Mar;9(Spec Feature):70-3
pubmed: 27668047
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Feb;10(2):147-56
pubmed: 19147408
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2591-601
pubmed: 27269950
Blood. 2016 Apr 14;127(15):1863-9
pubmed: 26747249
Br J Haematol. 2018 Oct;183(2):196-211
pubmed: 30080238
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Feb;60(2):295-301
pubmed: 30033840
Haematologica. 2020 Apr;105(4):1032-1041
pubmed: 31296574
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39416
pubmed: 22761788
Ann Hematol. 2012 Jul;91(7):997-1005
pubmed: 22249209
Drugs. 2019 Mar;79(4):447-454
pubmed: 30830601
Blood. 2018 Mar 1;131(9):995-999
pubmed: 29305553
Oncoimmunology. 2019 May 1;8(8):1607673
pubmed: 31413916
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):43-53
pubmed: 23959396
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jul;41(11):1570-83
pubmed: 16026693
Immunol Rev. 2016 Mar;270(1):95-112
pubmed: 26864107
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 20;9:2134
pubmed: 30294326
Haematologica. 2016 Jun;101(6):732-40
pubmed: 26944475
J Clin Invest. 2012 Oct;122(10):3398-406
pubmed: 23023710
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020 Jan 16;:
pubmed: 31944572
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018 Aug;13(4):265-274
pubmed: 29948644
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):275-284
pubmed: 30795996
Haematologica. 2019 Mar;104(3):e100-e103
pubmed: 30190344
Klin Padiatr. 1994 Jul-Aug;206(4):208-21
pubmed: 7526027
Blood. 2019 Aug 22;134(8):713-716
pubmed: 31311816
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Nov;53(11):1487-1489
pubmed: 29884853
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019 Apr;14(2):83-93
pubmed: 30880359
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405
pubmed: 27069254
Blood. 2020 Jan 16;135(3):159-166
pubmed: 31738819
Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(2):284-293
pubmed: 28771663
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020 Jan;98(1):57-67
pubmed: 31197916
Haematologica. 2011 Feb;96(2):284-90
pubmed: 21109694
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;999:123-36
pubmed: 23666694
Leukemia. 2015 Oct;29(10):2039-49
pubmed: 25975191
Blood. 2016 Aug 18;128(7):959-70
pubmed: 27307294