Right heart failure before LVAD implantation predicts right heart failure after LVAD implantation - is it that easy?
Continuous flow
LVAD
Right heart failure
Ventricular assist device
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 May 2020
25 May 2020
Historique:
received:
17
01
2020
accepted:
10
05
2020
entrez:
27
5
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
7
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is common and associated with worse outcome. Prediction of RHF remains challenging. Our study aims to assess predictors of RHF focusing on clinical manifestations. We retrospectively analyzed clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters of 112 patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Pre-operative, early (ERHF, day 7 and 14) and late postoperative RHF (LRHF, after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months) were assessed. In the total study population (87.5% men, mean age 55 years), early RHF was frequent (47% on day 7 and 30% on day 14). Prevalence of late RHF and death from RHF was high after 3, 6 and 12 months (23, 24 and 17%). Pre-existing RHF was only associated with early RHF and persistent, but not for new onset late RHF. Early RHF was associated with lower INTERMACS level (p < 0.001), higher pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.046) and CVP/PAWP quotient (p = 0.011), higher bilirubin (p = 0.038) and creatinine (p = 0.013). LRHF was associated with creatinine (p = 0.006), urea (p = 0.012) and load adaption index (p = 0.007). Binary logistic regression models identified no single risk factors. Comparing the predictive value of regression models with a model of three clinical findings (INTERMACS level, age and pre-operative RHF) did not reveal differences in RHF. RHF before LVAD implantation enhances the risk of early RHF and persistent late RHF, but not for new onset late RHF, supporting the hypothesis of differences in the etiology. Echocardiographic or hemodynamic parameters did not show a predictive value for new onset late RHF. Similar predictive value of clinical findings and statistic models of risk factors suggest that a clinical evaluation is equally matched to predict RHF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is common and associated with worse outcome. Prediction of RHF remains challenging. Our study aims to assess predictors of RHF focusing on clinical manifestations.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters of 112 patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Pre-operative, early (ERHF, day 7 and 14) and late postoperative RHF (LRHF, after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months) were assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the total study population (87.5% men, mean age 55 years), early RHF was frequent (47% on day 7 and 30% on day 14). Prevalence of late RHF and death from RHF was high after 3, 6 and 12 months (23, 24 and 17%). Pre-existing RHF was only associated with early RHF and persistent, but not for new onset late RHF. Early RHF was associated with lower INTERMACS level (p < 0.001), higher pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.046) and CVP/PAWP quotient (p = 0.011), higher bilirubin (p = 0.038) and creatinine (p = 0.013). LRHF was associated with creatinine (p = 0.006), urea (p = 0.012) and load adaption index (p = 0.007). Binary logistic regression models identified no single risk factors. Comparing the predictive value of regression models with a model of three clinical findings (INTERMACS level, age and pre-operative RHF) did not reveal differences in RHF.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
RHF before LVAD implantation enhances the risk of early RHF and persistent late RHF, but not for new onset late RHF, supporting the hypothesis of differences in the etiology. Echocardiographic or hemodynamic parameters did not show a predictive value for new onset late RHF. Similar predictive value of clinical findings and statistic models of risk factors suggest that a clinical evaluation is equally matched to predict RHF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32450890
doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01150-x
pii: 10.1186/s13019-020-01150-x
pmc: PMC7249428
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113Références
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e012073
pubmed: 31411097
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):112-8
pubmed: 22039212
Circ J. 2012;76(12):2785-91
pubmed: 22878403
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 3;51(22):2163-72
pubmed: 18510965
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 1;105(7):1030-5
pubmed: 20346326
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 May;34(5):667-74
pubmed: 25577566
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Dec;34(12):1604-10
pubmed: 26163154
J Card Fail. 2013 Jan;19(1):16-24
pubmed: 23273590
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;19(7):926-946
pubmed: 28371221
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1080-1086
pubmed: 28942782
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Oct;27(10):1102-7
pubmed: 18926401
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1316-24
pubmed: 20132950
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):97-105
pubmed: 27469015
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Dec;27(12):1286-92
pubmed: 19059108
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Feb;33(2):141-8
pubmed: 23932442
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Aug;34(8):1024-32
pubmed: 25935438
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11 Suppl 1):S14-23
pubmed: 24030398
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Sep;34(9):1123-30
pubmed: 26267741