Fluoxetine to improve functional outcomes in patients after acute stroke: the FOCUS RCT.
DECISION-MAKING
DEPRESSION
DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
FLUOXETINE
FRACTURES, BONE
HOSPITALS
HUMANS
MOOD DISORDERS
PHYSICAL RECOVERY
RANDOMISED TRIAL
STROKE
TREATMENT OUTCOME
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
entrez:
27
5
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2020
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our Cochrane review of selective serotonin inhibitors for stroke recovery indicated that fluoxetine may improve functional recovery, but the trials were small and most were at high risk of bias. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial tested the hypothesis that fluoxetine improves recovery after stroke. The FOCUS trial was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This trial took place in 103 UK hospitals. Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥ 18 years, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, with focal neurological deficits, between 2 and 15 days after onset. Patients were randomly allocated 20 mg of fluoxetine once per day or the matching placebo for 6 months via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Outcome was assessed at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed by their treatment allocation as specified in a published statistical analysis plan. Between 10 September 2012 and 31 March 2017, we recruited 3127 patients, 1564 of whom were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 of whom were allocated placebo. The modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months was available for 1553 out of 1564 (99.3%) of those allocated fluoxetine and 1553 out of 1563 (99.4%) of those allocated placebo. The distribution across modified Rankin Scale categories at 6 months was similar in the two groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0.951, 95% confidence interval 0.839 to 1.079; Some non-adherence to trial medication, lack of face-to-face assessment of neurological status at follow-up and lack of formal psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up. 20 mg of fluoxetine daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve patients' functional outcome but decreased the occurrence of depression and increased the risk of fractures. These data inform decisions about using fluoxetine after stroke to improve functional outcome or to prevent or treat mood disorders. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) (Australasia/Vietnam) and Efficacy oF Fluoxetine - a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS) (Sweden) trials recruited an additional 2780 patients and will report their results in 2020. These three trials have an almost identical protocol, which was collaboratively developed. Our planned individual patient data meta-analysis will provide more precise estimates of the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and indicate whether or not effects vary depending on patients' characteristics and health-care setting. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83290762. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Fluoxetine, sometimes referred to by the drug company name Prozac, has been used for many years to treat people who are depressed, including after a stroke. However, studies have suggested that treatment with fluoxetine started soon after a stroke might improve patients’ physical recovery. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial recruited 3127 volunteers who had had a stroke within the previous 2 weeks from 103 UK hospitals between 2012 and 2017. Participants were randomly allocated to take a 6-month course of fluoxetine or an identical placebo capsule containing no fluoxetine. They were followed up at 6 months and 12 months after recruitment. Patients completed questionnaires that indicated how much they had recovered, and also measured their mood, fatigue and quality of life. The results of the trial showed that the physical recovery of patients was very similar in both groups. This indicates that fluoxetine does not improve physical outcomes of stroke patients. However, participants receiving fluoxetine were less likely to develop depression after the stroke but once the fluoxetine was stopped these effects on mood disappeared. Unfortunately, patients on fluoxetine were slightly more likely to fall and fracture a bone than those on placebo. The FOCUS trial is the first of three large randomised controlled trials testing fluoxetine in stroke patients to be completed. The FOCUS trial results suggest that patients with stroke should not routinely be treated with fluoxetine. The other two trials will give us further information about the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and whether or not its effects differ between countries or ethnic groups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Our Cochrane review of selective serotonin inhibitors for stroke recovery indicated that fluoxetine may improve functional recovery, but the trials were small and most were at high risk of bias.
OBJECTIVES
The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial tested the hypothesis that fluoxetine improves recovery after stroke.
DESIGN
The FOCUS trial was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING
This trial took place in 103 UK hospitals.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥ 18 years, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, with focal neurological deficits, between 2 and 15 days after onset.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly allocated 20 mg of fluoxetine once per day or the matching placebo for 6 months via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Outcome was assessed at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed by their treatment allocation as specified in a published statistical analysis plan.
RESULTS
Between 10 September 2012 and 31 March 2017, we recruited 3127 patients, 1564 of whom were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 of whom were allocated placebo. The modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months was available for 1553 out of 1564 (99.3%) of those allocated fluoxetine and 1553 out of 1563 (99.4%) of those allocated placebo. The distribution across modified Rankin Scale categories at 6 months was similar in the two groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0.951, 95% confidence interval 0.839 to 1.079;
LIMITATIONS
Some non-adherence to trial medication, lack of face-to-face assessment of neurological status at follow-up and lack of formal psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
20 mg of fluoxetine daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve patients' functional outcome but decreased the occurrence of depression and increased the risk of fractures. These data inform decisions about using fluoxetine after stroke to improve functional outcome or to prevent or treat mood disorders. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) (Australasia/Vietnam) and Efficacy oF Fluoxetine - a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS) (Sweden) trials recruited an additional 2780 patients and will report their results in 2020. These three trials have an almost identical protocol, which was collaboratively developed. Our planned individual patient data meta-analysis will provide more precise estimates of the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and indicate whether or not effects vary depending on patients' characteristics and health-care setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83290762.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
Fluoxetine, sometimes referred to by the drug company name Prozac, has been used for many years to treat people who are depressed, including after a stroke. However, studies have suggested that treatment with fluoxetine started soon after a stroke might improve patients’ physical recovery. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial recruited 3127 volunteers who had had a stroke within the previous 2 weeks from 103 UK hospitals between 2012 and 2017. Participants were randomly allocated to take a 6-month course of fluoxetine or an identical placebo capsule containing no fluoxetine. They were followed up at 6 months and 12 months after recruitment. Patients completed questionnaires that indicated how much they had recovered, and also measured their mood, fatigue and quality of life. The results of the trial showed that the physical recovery of patients was very similar in both groups. This indicates that fluoxetine does not improve physical outcomes of stroke patients. However, participants receiving fluoxetine were less likely to develop depression after the stroke but once the fluoxetine was stopped these effects on mood disappeared. Unfortunately, patients on fluoxetine were slightly more likely to fall and fracture a bone than those on placebo. The FOCUS trial is the first of three large randomised controlled trials testing fluoxetine in stroke patients to be completed. The FOCUS trial results suggest that patients with stroke should not routinely be treated with fluoxetine. The other two trials will give us further information about the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and whether or not its effects differ between countries or ethnic groups.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Fluoxetine, sometimes referred to by the drug company name Prozac, has been used for many years to treat people who are depressed, including after a stroke. However, studies have suggested that treatment with fluoxetine started soon after a stroke might improve patients’ physical recovery. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial recruited 3127 volunteers who had had a stroke within the previous 2 weeks from 103 UK hospitals between 2012 and 2017. Participants were randomly allocated to take a 6-month course of fluoxetine or an identical placebo capsule containing no fluoxetine. They were followed up at 6 months and 12 months after recruitment. Patients completed questionnaires that indicated how much they had recovered, and also measured their mood, fatigue and quality of life. The results of the trial showed that the physical recovery of patients was very similar in both groups. This indicates that fluoxetine does not improve physical outcomes of stroke patients. However, participants receiving fluoxetine were less likely to develop depression after the stroke but once the fluoxetine was stopped these effects on mood disappeared. Unfortunately, patients on fluoxetine were slightly more likely to fall and fracture a bone than those on placebo. The FOCUS trial is the first of three large randomised controlled trials testing fluoxetine in stroke patients to be completed. The FOCUS trial results suggest that patients with stroke should not routinely be treated with fluoxetine. The other two trials will give us further information about the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and whether or not its effects differ between countries or ethnic groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32452356
doi: 10.3310/hta24220
pmc: PMC7294394
doi:
Substances chimiques
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
0
Fluoxetine
01K63SUP8D
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN83290762']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-94Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 13/04/30
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Martin Dennis, Maree Hackett, Graeme J Hankey, Gillian Mead and Erik Lundström report grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) and funding from the Swedish Research Council Framework grant in clinical therapy research during the conduct of the study. Maree Hackett also reports grants from The Stroke Association (London, UK), grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Stroke Research Network and a grant in clinical therapy research during the conduct of the study, and grants from the National Heart Foundation of Australia outside the submitted work. She also held a National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Career Development Fellowship, level 2 (reference APP1141328) (2018–21). Stephanie Lewis reports being a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment General Committee (2016 to present). Peter Sandercock reports lecture fees from Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany) paid to his department, outside the submitted work.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 2;153(9):553-62
pubmed: 20855784
Stroke. 2002 Mar;33(3):728-34
pubmed: 11872896
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40
pubmed: 10512918
Stroke. 2007 Nov;38(11):3076-83
pubmed: 17932334
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):493-505
pubmed: 12194620
Stroke. 2011 Aug;42(8):2276-9
pubmed: 21680905
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;13(3):257-63
pubmed: 19885045
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2090-5
pubmed: 17525397
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;157(3):351-9
pubmed: 10698809
Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521-6
pubmed: 1675378
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):950-63
pubmed: 12881816
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012 May;9(5-6):41-6
pubmed: 22808448
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):239-51
pubmed: 19528133
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):1243-51
pubmed: 22554569
Stroke. 2012 Mar;43(3):851-3
pubmed: 22135076
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD009286
pubmed: 23152272
Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 Apr;49(2):149-164
pubmed: 30391148
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3280-3282
pubmed: 31426731
Neurology. 2017 Sep 26;89(13):1400-1407
pubmed: 28842449
J Neurol. 2009 Jul;256(7):1152-8
pubmed: 19306038
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;85(6):709-10
pubmed: 24403283
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;169(4):516-21
pubmed: 8894205
Stroke. 1996 Jul;27(7):1211-4
pubmed: 8685930
QJM. 2007 Sep;100(9):539-45
pubmed: 17693418
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2004 Mar;111(3):387-411
pubmed: 14991461
Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4
pubmed: 4136544
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017 May;10(5):241-244
pubmed: 28529545
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):507-15
pubmed: 15838417
Trials. 2013 Mar 19;14:77
pubmed: 23510124
Ann Neurol. 2001 Dec;50(6):718-29
pubmed: 11761469
J Neurol. 2014 Mar;261(3):533-45
pubmed: 24477489
Lancet. 2019 Jan 19;393(10168):265-274
pubmed: 30528472
Trials. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):627
pubmed: 29282099
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 18;6(3):e16988
pubmed: 21445242
BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):843
pubmed: 15817555
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Neurosci Res. 2009 Mar;87(4):1037-45
pubmed: 18855941
BMJ. 2008 Feb 16;336(7640):376-9
pubmed: 18230644
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366
pubmed: 29477251
Bull World Health Organ. 1976;54(5):541-53
pubmed: 1088404
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1911-5
pubmed: 17463316
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jun;15(4):365-376
pubmed: 31619137
Behav Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;18(5-6):391-418
pubmed: 17762509
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2006 Feb;3(1):67-72
pubmed: 16472127
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1178-1189
pubmed: 29276014
Trials. 2015 Aug 20;16:369
pubmed: 26289352
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:223-50
pubmed: 16022595
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 May;168:1-6
pubmed: 29494855
BMJ. 2011 Aug 02;343:d4551
pubmed: 21810886
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2017 Jun;3(2):75-81
pubmed: 30775508
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Feb;10(2):123-30
pubmed: 21216670
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Oct;181(4):751-60
pubmed: 15988572
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1581-7
pubmed: 7477192
Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1041-7
pubmed: 11935058
Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):170-7
pubmed: 27178477
Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):448-56
pubmed: 27055878
Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):1048-50
pubmed: 20224060
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):724-7
pubmed: 23411790
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):311-4
pubmed: 18219053
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 May 07;2:23
pubmed: 15132745
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458
pubmed: 30871944
Med Care. 1991 Feb;29(2):169-76
pubmed: 1994148
Trials. 2011 Jul 05;12:168
pubmed: 21729277
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jul;12(7):439-45
pubmed: 9229283
Qual Life Res. 2006 Apr;15(3):367-76
pubmed: 16547774
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1958-65
pubmed: 19477503
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2009 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-5
pubmed: 19536922
Science. 2003 Aug 8;301(5634):805-9
pubmed: 12907793
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;64(9):1310-7
pubmed: 20653802
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;19(12):1007-15
pubmed: 21358384
J Neurol. 2009 Jul;256(7):1159-60
pubmed: 19271104
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Apr;25(4):761-70
pubmed: 26823037
Int J Stroke. 2013 Apr;8(3):193-6
pubmed: 23130972
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999 Dec;19(12):1365-75
pubmed: 10598941
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Aug;115(4):543-6
pubmed: 7871100
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):177-87
pubmed: 26923613
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;190:260-5
pubmed: 17329748
Neurochem Int. 2007 Jun;50(7-8):1028-41
pubmed: 17531349