Indigenous Preferences for Inpatient Rooms in Australian Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study in Cross-Cultural Design.

Indigenous health cross-cultural design mixed-methods patient rooms theory of supportive design

Journal

HERD
ISSN: 2167-5112
Titre abrégé: HERD
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101537529

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 29 5 2020
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 29 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This mixed-method study aimed to establish preliminary evidence for spatial and design features that can improve the experience and participation of Indigenous inpatients in healthcare. Disadvantaged across a range of health measures, a disproportionately high number of Indigenous people leave hospital without receiving appropriate medical care. Australian government policies to improve cultural safety of Indigenous patients have largely ignored physical settings and their potential to improve health outcomes. Despite increasing evidence on the potential of design to reduce patient stress, there is minimal research on cross-cultural design in health facilities, including for Indigenous Australians. A cross-sectional, area-based survey elicited design preferences of four healthcare settings from Indigenous participants ( Participants showed majority preferences for the two-bed patient room, for a balcony rather than a window only, Indigenous art, and view of a park over an urban environment. Analysis of qualitative data shifted the focus from Ulrich's three supportive design components to cultural recognition, the desire for company of family members, and connection to life outdoors. Social and cultural factors were highly significant to patients for sense of control, family support, and positive distraction. In response, inpatient room size and type, views, access to outdoors and Indigenous art need to be considered in hospital design for Indigenous patients and families.

Sections du résumé

AIM OBJECTIVE
This mixed-method study aimed to establish preliminary evidence for spatial and design features that can improve the experience and participation of Indigenous inpatients in healthcare.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Disadvantaged across a range of health measures, a disproportionately high number of Indigenous people leave hospital without receiving appropriate medical care. Australian government policies to improve cultural safety of Indigenous patients have largely ignored physical settings and their potential to improve health outcomes. Despite increasing evidence on the potential of design to reduce patient stress, there is minimal research on cross-cultural design in health facilities, including for Indigenous Australians.
METHODS METHODS
A cross-sectional, area-based survey elicited design preferences of four healthcare settings from Indigenous participants (
RESULTS RESULTS
Participants showed majority preferences for the two-bed patient room, for a balcony rather than a window only, Indigenous art, and view of a park over an urban environment. Analysis of qualitative data shifted the focus from Ulrich's three supportive design components to cultural recognition, the desire for company of family members, and connection to life outdoors.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Social and cultural factors were highly significant to patients for sense of control, family support, and positive distraction. In response, inpatient room size and type, views, access to outdoors and Indigenous art need to be considered in hospital design for Indigenous patients and families.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32462919
doi: 10.1177/1937586720925552
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

174-189

Auteurs

Daphne Nash (D)

Aboriginal Environments Research Centre, 1974The University of Queensland, Australia.

Timothy O'Rourke (T)

School of Architecture, 1974The University of Queensland, Australia.

Paul Memmott (P)

Aboriginal Environments Research Centre, 1974The University of Queensland, Australia.

Michele Haynes (M)

Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, 95359Australian Catholic University, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH