Impact of concomitant acid suppressive therapy on pazopanib efficacy and dose reductions in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Aged
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ drug therapy
Cohort Studies
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Histamine H2 Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Indazoles
Kidney Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Proton Pump Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Pyrimidines
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Sulfonamides
/ administration & dosage
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Drug-drug interaction
Histamine 2 receptor antagonists
PPI
Pazopanib
Proton pump inhibitors
Renal cell carcinoma
mRCC
Journal
European journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1432-1041
Titre abrégé: Eur J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1256165
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
06
02
2020
accepted:
14
05
2020
pubmed:
1
6
2020
medline:
13
5
2021
entrez:
1
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of acid suppressive therapy on clinical efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A single-center retrospective study was carried out. Charts of mRCC patients who received pazopanib as first-line treatment were reviewed and concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) was studied. Two groups of patients were identified, namely patients receiving PPI/H2RA and patients without acid suppressive therapy. Both groups were compared with regard to progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and time to dose reduction of pazopanib. Ninety-one patients were included. Median PFS was 8 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 7 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-1.35)), p = 0.35. Median OS was 27 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 23 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.46-1.66)), p = 0.68. Mean tumor response was 17% (95% CI 8-25%) in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 11% (95% CI 0-21%) in the no PPI/H2RA group, p = 0.52. Median time to first dose reduction was 9 months in both subgroups (HR 1.25 (95% CI 0.65-2.39)), p = 0.51. Median time to second dose (< 600 mg) reduction was 17 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 7 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.07-0.89)), p = 0.03. In this limited patient series, no evidence of a negative impact of PPI/H2RA on clinical outcome and time to first dose reduction was observed. These results suggest that PPI/H2RA might be considered, when there is a clinical need, in patients treated with pazopanib for mRCC. However, a prospective study is warranted to confirm these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32474662
doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02902-3
pii: 10.1007/s00228-020-02902-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Histamine H2 Antagonists
0
Indazoles
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Proton Pump Inhibitors
0
Pyrimidines
0
Sulfonamides
0
pazopanib
7RN5DR86CK
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM