Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and lower extremity amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2019
accepted:
18
05
2020
entrez:
6
6
2020
pubmed:
6
6
2020
medline:
22
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i's) and lower extremity amputation is unclear. To systematically review randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies quantifying risk of lower extremity amputations associated with SGLT2i use. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2011 to February 2020 for RCTs and observational studies including lower extremity amputation outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with SGLT2i's vs. alternative treatments or placebo. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Our primary outcome was risk of lower limb amputation. Secondary outcomes included peripheral arterial disease, peripheral vascular disease, venous ulcerations, and diabetic foot infections. We also evaluated the risk of bias. We conducted random and fixed effects relative risk meta-analysis of RCTs. After screening 2,006 studies, 12 RCTs and 18 observational studies were included, of which 7 RCTs and 18 observational studies had at least one event. The random effects meta-analysis of 7 RCTs suggested the absence of a statistically significant association between SGLT2i exposure with evidence of substantial statistical heterogeneity (n = 424/23,716 vs n = 267/18,737 in controls; RR 1.28, CI's 0.93-1.76; I2 = 62.0%; p = 0.12) whereas fixed effects analysis showed an increased risk with statistical heterogeneity (RR 1.27, 1.09-1.48; I2 = 62%; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of canagliflozin vs placebo showed a statistically significantly increased risk in a fixed effects meta-analysis (n = 2 RCTs, RR 1.59, 1.26-2.01; I2 = 88%; p = 0.0001) whereas the meta-analysis of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin (n = 2 RCTs each) and a single RCT for ertugliflozin did not show a significantly increased risk. The findings from observational studies were too heterogeneous to be pooled in a meta-analysis and draw meaningful conclusions. Both randomized and observational studies were of generally good methodological quality. Overall, there was no consistent evidence of SGLT2i exposure and increased risk of amputation. The increased risk of amputation seen in the large, long-term Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial for canagliflozin, and select observational studies, merits continued exploration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i's) and lower extremity amputation is unclear.
PURPOSE
To systematically review randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies quantifying risk of lower extremity amputations associated with SGLT2i use.
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2011 to February 2020 for RCTs and observational studies including lower extremity amputation outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with SGLT2i's vs. alternative treatments or placebo.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Our primary outcome was risk of lower limb amputation. Secondary outcomes included peripheral arterial disease, peripheral vascular disease, venous ulcerations, and diabetic foot infections. We also evaluated the risk of bias. We conducted random and fixed effects relative risk meta-analysis of RCTs.
RESULTS
After screening 2,006 studies, 12 RCTs and 18 observational studies were included, of which 7 RCTs and 18 observational studies had at least one event. The random effects meta-analysis of 7 RCTs suggested the absence of a statistically significant association between SGLT2i exposure with evidence of substantial statistical heterogeneity (n = 424/23,716 vs n = 267/18,737 in controls; RR 1.28, CI's 0.93-1.76; I2 = 62.0%; p = 0.12) whereas fixed effects analysis showed an increased risk with statistical heterogeneity (RR 1.27, 1.09-1.48; I2 = 62%; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of canagliflozin vs placebo showed a statistically significantly increased risk in a fixed effects meta-analysis (n = 2 RCTs, RR 1.59, 1.26-2.01; I2 = 88%; p = 0.0001) whereas the meta-analysis of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin (n = 2 RCTs each) and a single RCT for ertugliflozin did not show a significantly increased risk. The findings from observational studies were too heterogeneous to be pooled in a meta-analysis and draw meaningful conclusions. Both randomized and observational studies were of generally good methodological quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, there was no consistent evidence of SGLT2i exposure and increased risk of amputation. The increased risk of amputation seen in the large, long-term Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial for canagliflozin, and select observational studies, merits continued exploration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32502190
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234065
pii: PONE-D-19-31534
pmc: PMC7274434
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzhydryl Compounds
0
Glucosides
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Sulfonylurea Compounds
0
dapagliflozin
1ULL0QJ8UC
glimepiride
6KY687524K
empagliflozin
HDC1R2M35U
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0234065Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I am past Chair the FDA’s Peripheral and Central Nervous System Advisory Committee; have served as a paid advisor to IQVIA; am a co-founding Principal and equity holder in Monument Analytics, a health care consultancy whose clients include the life sciences industry as well as plaintiffs in opioid litigation; and a member of OptumRx’s National P&T Committee. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. Omar Mansour is a consultant with Monument Analytics. Monument Analytics provided support in the form of salary for Mr. Mansour, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):31-39
pubmed: 30424892
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357
pubmed: 30415602
P T. 2015 Jul;40(7):451-62
pubmed: 26185406
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2201-2217
pubmed: 31606880
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2532-2540
pubmed: 29888547
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):417-426
pubmed: 31692244
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):429-441
pubmed: 30992195
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1190-1198
pubmed: 30105373
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jul;153:138-144
pubmed: 31150722
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1176-1185
pubmed: 29316236
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 May;21(5):1223-1236
pubmed: 30697897
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 1;150(5):469-75
pubmed: 10472946
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2200-2209
pubmed: 29766636
Metabolism. 2019 Jul;96:92-100
pubmed: 30980838
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020 Feb;19(2):211-221
pubmed: 31769309
J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Mar;43(3):289-304
pubmed: 31489568
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Oct 15;3(1):e00096
pubmed: 31922023
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Mar;13(3):139-46
pubmed: 15072112
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;7(2):169-172
pubmed: 30704605
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):926-938
pubmed: 30868176
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2792-2799
pubmed: 29971914
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2585-2597
pubmed: 29938883
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306
pubmed: 30990260
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):193-207
pubmed: 29282633
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2018 Jul 17;13:46-47
pubmed: 30094190
BMJ. 2018 Nov 14;363:k4365
pubmed: 30429124
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Mar;10(2):418-428
pubmed: 30099847
Trials. 2012 Aug 20;13:138
pubmed: 22906139
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jan;21(1):28-36
pubmed: 30039524
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):582-589
pubmed: 28898514
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85
pubmed: 29222379
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;140:118-128
pubmed: 29604389
Diabetologia. 2019 Apr;62(4):621-632
pubmed: 30631892