Online monitoring of the morphology of an industrial sugarcane biofuel yeast strain via in situ microscopy.

In industrial yeast fermentation processes, single-cell yeast suspensions are usually preferable to cells in aggregates, as single cells exhibit a larger contact area with the nutrient medium, which in many cases helps optimize the process. In addition to affecting fermentation time and efficiency, cell aggregates (e.g., pseudohyphal yeast morphology) may also impair centrifugation systems, one of the most expensive and complex steps of the production process that involves the recovery of yeast cells for subsequent fermentation cycles. To date, no standard technique allows for a systematic diagnosis of yeast morphology in real time during sugarcane biofuel fermentation. Accordingly, we investigate an in situ microscope (ISM) for online monitoring of the density and morphology of an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in Brazilian distilleries (PE-2). During batch and repeated batch sugarcane molasses fermentation, the instrument revealed single cells, budding yeast cells, and pseudohyphae, all in a variety of sizes and shapes. The ISM image analysis indicated that the volume of single yeast cells increased by roughly 40% over the lag phase before budding and remained approximately constant thereafter. Pseudohyphae with three and more cells appeared mostly during the stationary phase. Cooling problems were simulated by raising the temperature from 33 to 45 °C. During this thermal stress, single cells as well as budding cells and pseudohyphae forming cells became smaller and exhibited intracellular inhomogeneities. From these results, we conclude that an ISM is a useful tool for monitoring yeast morphology during sugarcane fermentation. Atypical morphologies can be detected early and be used as an automatic warning system.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.