Trial of Labor After Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries: Patient and Hospital Characteristics and Birth Outcomes.


Journal

Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 17 6 2020
medline: 24 11 2020
entrez: 17 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery has been mostly studied in the setting of one prior cesarean delivery; controversy remains regarding the risks and benefits of trial of labor for women with two prior cesarean deliveries. This study aimed to examine utilization, success rate, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor in this population. Using linked hospital discharge and birth certificate data, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of mothers with nonanomalous, term, singleton live births in California between 2010-2012 and had two prior cesarean deliveries and no clear contraindications for trial of labor. We measured whether they attempted labor and, if so, whether they delivered vaginally. Association of patient and hospital characteristics with the likelihood of attempting labor and successful vaginal birth was examined using multivariable regressions. We compared composite severe maternal morbidities and composite severe newborn complications in those who underwent trial of labor as opposed to planned cesarean delivery using a propensity score-matching approach. Among 42,771 women who met sample eligibility criteria, 1,228 (2.9%) attempted labor, of whom 484 (39.4%) delivered vaginally. There was no significant difference in the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities, but there was a modest increase in the risk of composite severe newborn complications among women who attempted labor compared with those who did not (2.0% vs 1.4%, P=.04). After accounting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, propensity score-matched analysis showed no significant association between trial of labor and the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.91), but trial of labor was associated with a higher risk for the composite of severe newborn complications (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.04). Among women with two prior cesarean deliveries, trial of labor was rarely attempted and was successful in 39.4% of attempts. Trial of labor in this population was associated with a modest increase in severe neonatal morbidity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32541284
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003845
pmc: PMC7321852
mid: NIHMS1571367
pii: 00006250-202007000-00020
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109-117

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS023801
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Références

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9
pubmed: 15846208
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):360
pubmed: 31623587
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):98.e1-98.e14
pubmed: 30278176
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711
pubmed: 24553167
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127
pubmed: 30681543
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69
pubmed: 24123228
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):12-20
pubmed: 16816050
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):33-44
pubmed: 31502407
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1226-32
pubmed: 16738145
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1414-20
pubmed: 8092364
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):872-6
pubmed: 10521745
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 12;11:72
pubmed: 21992871
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Sep;169(9):855-62
pubmed: 26214387
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 May 20;64(4):1-13, back cover
pubmed: 26046963
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Oct;34(5):345-50
pubmed: 20869551
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):806-12
pubmed: 17400840
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):255-8
pubmed: 8041542
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1029-36
pubmed: 23090519
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):924-9
pubmed: 7770261
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Mar;36(4):346-351
pubmed: 30372778

Auteurs

Michael Dombrowski (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the Division of Neonatal & Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and the Division of Nursing Science, Rutgers University School of Nursing, Newark, New Jersey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH