Competitive Antagonism of Etomidate Action by Diazepam: In Vitro GABAA Receptor and In Vivo Zebrafish Studies.
Journal
Anesthesiology
ISSN: 1528-1175
Titre abrégé: Anesthesiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1300217
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
entrez:
17
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent cryo-electron microscopic imaging studies have shown that in addition to binding to the classical extracellular benzodiazepine binding site of the α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor, diazepam also binds to etomidate binding sites located in the transmembrane receptor domain. Because such binding is characterized by low modulatory efficacy, the authors hypothesized that diazepam would act in vitro and in vivo as a competitive etomidate antagonist. The concentration-dependent actions of diazepam on 20 µM etomidate-activated and 6 µM GABA-activated currents were defined (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) in oocyte-expressed α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. The ability of diazepam to inhibit receptor labeling of purified α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors by [H]azietomidate was assessed in photoaffinity labeling protection studies. The impact of diazepam (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) on the anesthetic potencies of etomidate and ketamine was compared in a zebrafish model. At nanomolar concentrations, diazepam comparably potentiated etomidate-activated and GABA-activated GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a flumazenil-reversible manner. The half-maximal potentiating concentrations were 39 nM (95% CI, 27 to 55 nM) and 26 nM (95% CI, 16 to 41 nM), respectively. However, at micromolar concentrations, diazepam reduced etomidate-activated, but not GABA-activated, GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a concentration-dependent manner with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 9.6 µM (95% CI, 7.6 to 12 µM). Diazepam (12.5 to 50 µM) also right-shifted the etomidate-concentration response curve for direct activation without reducing the maximal response and inhibited receptor photoaffinity labeling by [H]azietomidate. When administered with flumazenil, 50 µM diazepam shifted the etomidate (but not the ketamine) concentration-response curve for anesthesia rightward, increasing the etomidate EC50 by 18-fold. At micromolar concentrations and in the presence of flumazenil to inhibit allosteric modulation via the classical benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, diazepam acts as an in vitro and in vivo competitive etomidate antagonist.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recent cryo-electron microscopic imaging studies have shown that in addition to binding to the classical extracellular benzodiazepine binding site of the α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor, diazepam also binds to etomidate binding sites located in the transmembrane receptor domain. Because such binding is characterized by low modulatory efficacy, the authors hypothesized that diazepam would act in vitro and in vivo as a competitive etomidate antagonist.
METHODS
The concentration-dependent actions of diazepam on 20 µM etomidate-activated and 6 µM GABA-activated currents were defined (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) in oocyte-expressed α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. The ability of diazepam to inhibit receptor labeling of purified α1β3γ2L GABAA receptors by [H]azietomidate was assessed in photoaffinity labeling protection studies. The impact of diazepam (in the absence and presence of flumazenil) on the anesthetic potencies of etomidate and ketamine was compared in a zebrafish model.
RESULTS
At nanomolar concentrations, diazepam comparably potentiated etomidate-activated and GABA-activated GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a flumazenil-reversible manner. The half-maximal potentiating concentrations were 39 nM (95% CI, 27 to 55 nM) and 26 nM (95% CI, 16 to 41 nM), respectively. However, at micromolar concentrations, diazepam reduced etomidate-activated, but not GABA-activated, GABAA receptor peak current amplitudes in a concentration-dependent manner with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 9.6 µM (95% CI, 7.6 to 12 µM). Diazepam (12.5 to 50 µM) also right-shifted the etomidate-concentration response curve for direct activation without reducing the maximal response and inhibited receptor photoaffinity labeling by [H]azietomidate. When administered with flumazenil, 50 µM diazepam shifted the etomidate (but not the ketamine) concentration-response curve for anesthesia rightward, increasing the etomidate EC50 by 18-fold.
CONCLUSIONS
At micromolar concentrations and in the presence of flumazenil to inhibit allosteric modulation via the classical benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, diazepam acts as an in vitro and in vivo competitive etomidate antagonist.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32541553
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003403
pmc: PMC7944240
mid: NIHMS1676798
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Receptors, GABA
0
Diazepam
Q3JTX2Q7TU
Etomidate
Z22628B598
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
583-594Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P01 GM058448
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM122806
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM128989
Pays : United States
Références
Neurosci Lett. 1982 Apr 26;29(3):281-6
pubmed: 7048142
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7740):454-459
pubmed: 30602790
J Biol Chem. 2013 Jul 5;288(27):19343-57
pubmed: 23677991
Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):459-476
pubmed: 29894316
Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):791-803
pubmed: 21934407
J Clin Anesth. 1993 Nov-Dec;5(6 Suppl 1):46S-51S
pubmed: 8292369
J Clin Sleep Med. 2006 Apr 15;2(2):S12-8
pubmed: 17557502
Protein Sci. 2014 Feb;23(2):157-66
pubmed: 24288268
J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14;279(20):20982-92
pubmed: 15016806
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Dec;3(12):1274-81
pubmed: 11100148
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 06;10(7):e0131914
pubmed: 26148114
J Physiol. 2010 Jul 15;588(Pt 14):2557-69
pubmed: 20498234
J Neurochem. 2002 Jan;80(1):140-8
pubmed: 11796752
Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(2):241-6
pubmed: 21189125
J Med Chem. 2003 Mar 27;46(7):1257-65
pubmed: 12646036
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Dec 1;119(suppl_1):i167-i175
pubmed: 29161398
Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1394-9
pubmed: 20889946
J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 13;28(7):1588-97
pubmed: 18272680
Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):824-837
pubmed: 28857763
Mol Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;95(6):615-628
pubmed: 30952799
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Aug;20(4):300-6
pubmed: 17620835
Neuropharmacology. 2018 Jul 1;136(Pt A):10-22
pubmed: 29407219
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 May;9(5):370-86
pubmed: 18425091
J Med Chem. 2012 Jul 26;55(14):6554-65
pubmed: 22734650
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997 Nov;18(11):425-9
pubmed: 9426470
FASEB J. 2003 Feb;17(2):250-2
pubmed: 12475885
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 8;26(45):11599-605
pubmed: 17093081
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2008 Summer;46(3):1-10
pubmed: 18617814
Adv Pharmacol. 2015;72:229-62
pubmed: 25600373
Br J Pharmacol. 1983 Jun;79(2):565-75
pubmed: 6317114
Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):187-96
pubmed: 10024099
Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):959-969
pubmed: 30052529
Methods Enzymol. 2018;602:77-95
pubmed: 29588042