Gene coexpression network analysis and tissue-specific profiling of gene expression in jute (Corchorus capsularis L.).
Comparative transcriptome analysis
Fiber crop
Jute
RNA-seq
WGCNA
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2020
16 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
08
02
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
entrez:
18
6
2020
pubmed:
18
6
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Jute (Corchorus spp.), belonging to the Malvaceae family, is an important natural fiber crop, second only to cotton, and a multipurpose economic crop. Corchorus capsularis L. is one of the only two commercially cultivated species of jute. Gene expression is spatiotemporal and is influenced by many factors. Therefore, to understand the molecular mechanisms of tissue development, it is necessary to study tissue-specific gene expression and regulation. We used weighted gene coexpression network analysis, to predict the functional roles of gene coexpression modules and individual genes, including those underlying the development of different tissue types. Although several transcriptome studies have been conducted on C. capsularis, there have not yet been any systematic and comprehensive transcriptome analyses for this species. There was significant variation in gene expression between plant tissues. Comparative transcriptome analysis and weighted gene coexpression network analysis were performed for different C. capsularis tissues at different developmental stages. We identified numerous tissue-specific differentially expressed genes for each tissue, and 12 coexpression modules, comprising 126 to 4203 genes, associated with the development of various tissues. There was high consistency between the genes in modules related to tissues, and the candidate upregulated genes for each tissue. Further, a gene network including 21 genes directly regulated by transcription factor OMO55970.1 was discovered. Some of the genes, such as OMO55970.1, OMO51203.1, OMO50871.1, and OMO87663.1, directly involved in the development of stem bast tissue. We identified genes that were differentially expressed between tissues of the same developmental stage. Some genes were consistently up- or downregulated, depending on the developmental stage of each tissue. Further, we identified numerous coexpression modules and genes associated with the development of various tissues. These findings elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of each tissue, and will promote multipurpose molecular breeding in jute and other fiber crops.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Jute (Corchorus spp.), belonging to the Malvaceae family, is an important natural fiber crop, second only to cotton, and a multipurpose economic crop. Corchorus capsularis L. is one of the only two commercially cultivated species of jute. Gene expression is spatiotemporal and is influenced by many factors. Therefore, to understand the molecular mechanisms of tissue development, it is necessary to study tissue-specific gene expression and regulation. We used weighted gene coexpression network analysis, to predict the functional roles of gene coexpression modules and individual genes, including those underlying the development of different tissue types. Although several transcriptome studies have been conducted on C. capsularis, there have not yet been any systematic and comprehensive transcriptome analyses for this species.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was significant variation in gene expression between plant tissues. Comparative transcriptome analysis and weighted gene coexpression network analysis were performed for different C. capsularis tissues at different developmental stages. We identified numerous tissue-specific differentially expressed genes for each tissue, and 12 coexpression modules, comprising 126 to 4203 genes, associated with the development of various tissues. There was high consistency between the genes in modules related to tissues, and the candidate upregulated genes for each tissue. Further, a gene network including 21 genes directly regulated by transcription factor OMO55970.1 was discovered. Some of the genes, such as OMO55970.1, OMO51203.1, OMO50871.1, and OMO87663.1, directly involved in the development of stem bast tissue.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We identified genes that were differentially expressed between tissues of the same developmental stage. Some genes were consistently up- or downregulated, depending on the developmental stage of each tissue. Further, we identified numerous coexpression modules and genes associated with the development of various tissues. These findings elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of each tissue, and will promote multipurpose molecular breeding in jute and other fiber crops.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32546133
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06805-6
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-06805-6
pmc: PMC7298812
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Plant
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
406Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31601351
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (CN)
ID : 2017JJ3350
Organisme : Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
ID : CAAS-ASTIP-2017-IBFC01 and CAAS-XTCX2016016-2
Organisme : National hemp industry technical system
ID : CARS-16-E01
Organisme : Germplasm Resources Protection Project
ID : 2016NWB044
Références
Plant Cell. 2017 Aug;29(8):1806-1821
pubmed: 28808136
Nat Plants. 2017 Jan 30;3:16223
pubmed: 28134914
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 28;8(1):14539
pubmed: 30267030
Plant Biotechnol J. 2013 Aug;11(6):691-701
pubmed: 23551980
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9098
pubmed: 29904061
Plant J. 2005 Jun;42(5):618-40
pubmed: 15918878
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 09;9:271
pubmed: 18541026
Genome. 2018 May;61(5):323-327
pubmed: 29420906
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 29;7(1):16565
pubmed: 29185475
Genes (Basel). 2017 Sep 18;8(9):
pubmed: 28927022
Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 1;21(19):3787-93
pubmed: 15817693
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
pubmed: 19114008
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;696:291-303
pubmed: 21063955
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D355-60
pubmed: 19880382
Planta. 2015 Feb;241(2):371-85
pubmed: 25319611
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Mar 7;9(3):807-816
pubmed: 30679248
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
pubmed: 19289445
Funct Integr Genomics. 2012 Jun;12(2):229-48
pubmed: 22466020
Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8
pubmed: 18516045
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Sep 21;7:1403
pubmed: 27708656
New Phytol. 2019 Jun;222(4):1816-1831
pubmed: 30724367
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):194
pubmed: 29115926
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jan 22;16:12
pubmed: 25609311
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Nov 22;17(1):216
pubmed: 29166861
J Cell Sci. 2006 Jun 1;119(Pt 11):2282-90
pubmed: 16723734
Plant Physiol. 2015 Aug;168(4):1684-701
pubmed: 26099271
BMC Genomics. 2017 May 8;18(1):355
pubmed: 28482802
BMC Genomics. 2015 Dec 15;16:1062
pubmed: 26666317
Plant J. 2017 Sep;91(6):1088-1107
pubmed: 28640939