Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial.
Aged, 80 and over
Austria
/ epidemiology
Chronic Disease
/ drug therapy
Cluster Analysis
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Deprescriptions
Drug Utilization Review
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Germany
/ epidemiology
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing
/ prevention & control
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Polypharmacy
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 06 2020
18 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
20
6
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effects of a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review in elderly people with polypharmacy. Pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. 359 general practices in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. 3904 adults aged 75 years and older using eight or more drugs on a regular basis, recruited by their general practitioner. A newly developed electronic decision support tool comprising a comprehensive drug review to support general practitioners in deprescribing potentially inappropriate and non-evidence based drugs. Doctors were randomly allocated to either the electronic decision support tool or to provide treatment as usual. The primary outcome was the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. The key secondary outcome was reduction in the number of drugs. 3904 adults were enrolled between January and October 2015. 181 practices and 1953 participants were assigned to electronic decision support (intervention group) and 178 practices and 1951 participants to treatment as usual (control group). The primary outcome (composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months) occurred in 871 (44.6%) participants in the intervention group and 944 (48.4%) in the control group. In an intention-to-treat analysis the odds ratio of the composite outcome was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.07; P=0.19, 997 of 1953 In intention-to-treat analysis, a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review of elderly people with polypharmacy showed no conclusive effects on the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. Nonetheless, a reduction in drugs was achieved without detriment to patient outcomes. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10137559.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32554566
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1822
pmc: PMC7301164
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
m1822Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: This study was funded by the seventh Framework Programme of the European Union, theme Health-2012-Innovation-1-2.2.2-2 (grant agreement No 305388-2). All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. IK is a salaried employee of Duodecim Medical Publications, a company that develops and sells the EBMeDS (evidence based medicine electronic decision support) service that was used as the technology platform of the intervention in the trial. All other authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):227
pubmed: 29047344
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1323-1332
pubmed: 31504572
Trials. 2016 Jan 29;17:57
pubmed: 26822311
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):226
pubmed: 29047372
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2610-2626
pubmed: 28034175
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 07;13:74
pubmed: 25889849
Drugs Aging. 2016 Apr;33(4):249-66
pubmed: 26915076
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Mar;38:3-11
pubmed: 28063660
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):224
pubmed: 29047367
JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1690-1
pubmed: 9832001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 03;9:CD008165
pubmed: 30175841
BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):657-61
pubmed: 15775000
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):532-48
pubmed: 27059768
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):225
pubmed: 29047342
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):228
pubmed: 29047359
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 16;17(Suppl 1):231
pubmed: 29047332
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):12
pubmed: 29338686
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):136-47
pubmed: 16803468
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 9;19(1):110
pubmed: 29986668
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Nov 05;11:86
pubmed: 21054881
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Jun;9(6):430-4
pubmed: 17642388
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):113
pubmed: 30021528
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;71(7):861-75
pubmed: 25967540
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1648-54
pubmed: 20937924