Analysis of performance factors in 240 consecutive cases of robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopic stone treatment.
Learning curve
Robotic endourology
Robotic technology
Robotic ureteroscopy
Stone surgery
Ureteroscopy
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
21
04
2020
accepted:
09
06
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
14
9
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Flexible ureteroscopy is the keystone of modern kidney stone treatment. Although a simple surgical technique achieves good clinical results and a low complication rate, there are high demands on the surgeon's dexterity and ergonomic restrictions. Robotic-assisted flexible ureteroscopy (rfURS) could overcome these limitations. After 4 years of use of rfURS at a tertiary stone center, performance factors were analyzed to define the role of rfURS in kidney stone management. A rfURS system was installed in August 2014 at the SLK Kliniken (Heilbronn, Germany). Treatment data of N = 240 consecutive patients undergoing rfURS were prospectively collected and analyzed. The patient cohort represents typical stone formers. N = 240 renal units containing 443 stones with an average stone load of 1798 mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 32557097
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01103-5
pii: 10.1007/s11701-020-01103-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
265-274Subventions
Organisme : Elmed Medical
ID : The robotic device was provided by ELMED
Organisme : Elmed Medical
ID : Turkey.
Références
Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS et al (2008) Flexible robotic retrograde renoscopy: description of novel robotic device and preliminary laboratory experience. Urology 72(1):42–46 (Epub 2008/03/29)
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.076
Desai MM, Grover R, Aron M et al (2011) Robotic flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol 186(2):563–568 (Epub 2011/06/21)
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.128
Saglam R, Muslumanoglu AY, Tokatli Z et al (2014) A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b). Eur Urol 66(6):1092–1100 (Epub 2014/07/26)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047
Astroza G, Catalan M, Consigliere L, Selman T, Salvado J, Rubilar F (2017) Is a ureteral stent required after use of ureteral access sheath in presented patients who undergo flexible ureteroscopy? Cent Eur J Urol 70(1):88–92 (Epub 2017/05/04)
Dindo D, Clavien PA (2008) What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32(6):939–941 (Epub 2008/04/17)
doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9584-y
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213 (Epub 2004/07/27)
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Geavlete P, Saglam R, Georgescu D et al (2016) Robotic flexible ureteroscopy versus classic flexible ureteroscopy in renal stones: the initial romanian experience. Chirurgia (Bucur) 111(4):326–329 (Epub 2016/09/09)
de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139 (Epub 2013/10/24)
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0436
De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodriguez-Monsalve M, Audouin M, Doizi S, Traxer O (2018) Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths. BJU Int 122(6):959–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14389 (Epub 2018/05/13)
doi: 10.1111/bju.14389
Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E et al (2014) The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol. 32(4):1033–1040 (Epub 2013/10/19)
doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1185-1
Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189(2):580–584 (Epub 2012/09/18)
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
Breda A, Territo A, Lopez-Martinez JM (2016) Benefits and risks of ureteral access sheaths for retrograde renal access. Curr Opin Urol 26(1):70–75 (Epub 2015/11/12)
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000233
Tokas T, Herrmann TRW, Skolarikos A et al (2019) Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol 37(1):125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4 (Epub 2018/06/20)
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4
Jung H, Osther PJ (2015) Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus 4:373 (Epub 2015/07/29)
doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4
Buttice S, Proietti S, Dragos L, Traxer O (2017) Are you familiar with the flow of the Roboflex avicenna pump? Allow me to explain. J Endourol 31(4):418–419 (Epub 2017/01/06)
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0377
Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L et al (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol 30(1):49–55 (Epub 2015/09/19)
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0387
Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B et al (2018) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a review of dusting vs fragmentation with extraction. J Endourol 32(1):1–6 (Epub 2017/10/25)
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0641
Humphreys MR, Shah OD, Monga M et al (2018) Dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy-which technique is more efficacious? A prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 199(5):1272–1276 (Epub 2017/12/19)
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.126
Tracey J, Gagin G, Morhardt D, Hollingsworth J, Ghani KR (2018) Ureteroscopic high-frequency dusting utilizing a 120-W holmium laser. J Endourol 32(4):290–295 (Epub 2017/12/15)
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0220
Bultitude M, Smith D, Thomas K (2016) Contemporary management of stone disease: the new EAU urolithiasis guidelines for 2015. Eur Urol 69(3):483–484 (Epub 2015/08/26)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.010
Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482 (Epub 2015/09/08)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):468–474 (Epub 2015/09/01)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040
Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume—three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int 113(4):610–614 (Epub 2013/09/24)
doi: 10.1111/bju.12456
Rassweiler J, Fiedler M, Charalampogiannis N, Kabakci AS, Saglam R, Klein JT (2018) Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update. Urolithiasis 46(1):69–77 (Epub 2017/11/25)
doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1024-8
Turna B, Stein RJ, Smaldone MC et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol 179(4):1415–1419 (Epub 2008/02/22)
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.076
Proietti S, Dragos L, Emiliani E et al (2017) Ureteroscopic skills with and without Roboflex Avicenna in the K-box((R)) simulator. Cent Eur J Urol 70(1):76–80 (Epub 2017/05/04)
Amirabdollahian F, Livatino S, Vahedi B et al (2018) Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature. J Robot Surg. 12(1):11–25 (Epub 2017/12/03)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4
Waters TR, Dick RB (2015) Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness. Rehabil Nurs 40(3):148–165 (Epub 2014/07/22)
doi: 10.1002/rnj.166
Douk HS, Aghamiri MR, Ghorbani M, Farhood B, Bakhshandeh M, Hemmati HR (2018) Accuracy evaluation of distance inverse square law in determining virtual electron source location in Siemens Primus linac. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 23(2):105–113 (Epub 2018/04/24)
doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.01.002
Talari HF, Monfaredi R, Wilson E et al (2017) Robotically assisted ureteroscopy for kidney exploration. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 10135:1013512. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2253862 (Epub 2017/02/01)
pubmed: 29731536
pmcid: 5930009
Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD, Traxer O (2013) Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology 82(5):1017–1019 (Epub 2013/09/05)
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.017
York NE, Zheng M, Elmansy HM, Rivera ME, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE (2019) Stone-free outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi utilizing computed tomography imaging. Urology 124:52–56 (Epub 2018/11/06)
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.005
Cecen K, Karadag MA, Demir A, Bagcioglu M, Kocaaslan R, Sofikerim M (2014) Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10–20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Springerplus 3:557 (Epub 2014/10/22)
doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-557
Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O (2010) Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 24(10):1583–1588 (Epub 2010/07/16)
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629
Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M (2013) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int 111(3 Pt B):E127–E131 (Epub 2012/07/05)
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x
Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O (2012) Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Adv Urol 2012:543537 (Epub 2011/07/09)
doi: 10.1155/2012/543537
Kandemir A, Guven S, Balasar M, Sonmez MG, Taskapu H, Gurbuz R (2017) A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones. World J Urol 35(11):1771–1776 (Epub 2017/06/08)
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2058-9