Protocol Optimization and Implementation of Dual-Energy and Dual-Source Computed Tomography in Clinical Practice: Field of View, Speed, or Material Separation?
Journal
Journal of computer assisted tomography
ISSN: 1532-3145
Titre abrégé: J Comput Assist Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
30
7
2020
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical use of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) has been well established for more than a decade. Improved software and decreased postprocessing time have increased the advantages and availability of DECT and DSCT imaging. In this article, we will provide a practical guide for implementation of DECT and DSCT in clinical practice and discuss automated processing and selection of CT protocols in neurologic, cardiothoracic, vascular, body, and musculoskeletal imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32558772
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001039
pii: 00004728-202007000-00024
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
610-618Références
Wang M, Qi HT, Wang XM, et al. Dose performance and image quality: dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:396–400.
Kirchhoff S, Herzog P, Johnson T, et al. Assessment of radiation exposure on a dual-source computed tomography-scanner performing coronary computed tomography-angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:181–185.
Dikkers R, Greuter MJ, Kristanto W, et al. Assessment of image quality of 64-row dual source versus single source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70:61–68.
Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M, et al. Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:274–279.
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:340–346.
Abadi S, Mehrez H, Ursani A, et al. Direct quantification of breast dose during coronary CT angiography and evaluation of dose reduction strategies. AJR. 2011;196:152–158.
Prevedello LM. Advances in computed tomography evaluation of skull base diseases. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18:123–126.
Uotani K, Watanabe Y, Higashi M, et al. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2060–2065.
Morhard D, Fink C, Becker C, et al. Value of automatic bone subtraction in cranial CT angiography: comparison of bone-subtracted vs. standard CT angiography in 100 patients. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:974–982.
Donnino R, Jacobs JE, Doshi JV, et al. Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. AJR. 2009;192:1051–1056.
Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081–1086.
Budoff MJ. Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:279–287.
Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, et al. MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR. 2006;186:S387–S390.
Kau T, et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1677–1686.
Brockmann C, et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:630–637.
Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, et al. Dual-energy CT aortography with 50% reduced iodine dose versus single-energy CT aortography with standard iodine dose. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:611–618.
Parakh A, Macri F, Sahani D. Dual-energy computed tomography: dose reduction, series reduction, and contrast load reduction in dual-energy computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018;56:601–624.
Tomita H, Shibata K. Verification of the dose reduction effect via diluted injection in dual-energy computed tomography using a human blood flow phantom. Radiol Res Pract. 2019;2019:3512126.
Delesalle MA, Pontana F, Duhamel A, et al. Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT. Radiology. 2013;267:256–266.
Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G, et al. Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2357–2364.
Kang MJ, Park CM, Lee CH, et al. Dual-energy CT: clinical applications in various pulmonary diseases. Radiographics. 2010;30:685–698.
Thieme SF, Becker CR, Hacker M, et al. Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion—correlation to scintigraphy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:369–374.
Yan WQ, Xin YK, Jing Y, et al. Iodine quantification using dual-energy computed tomography for differentiating thymic tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42:873–880.
Odisio EG, Truong MT, Duran C, et al. Role of dual-energy computed tomography in thoracic oncology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018;56:535–548.
Lu GM, Zhao Y, Zhang LJ, et al. Dual-energy CT of the lung. AJR. 2012;199:S40–S53.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology. 2009;252:433–440.
Kaza RK, Platt JF, Cohan RH, et al. Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics. 2012;32:353–369.
Mallinson PI, Coupal TM, McLaughlin PD, et al. Dual-energy CT for the musculoskeletal system. Radiology. 2016;281:690–707.
Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1424–1429.