Multi-colour extrusion fused deposition modelling: a low-cost 3D printing method for anatomical prostate cancer models.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 06 2020
19 06 2020
Historique:
received:
20
01
2020
accepted:
01
06
2020
entrez:
21
6
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional (3D) printed prostate cancer models are an emerging adjunct for urological surgical planning and patient education, however published methods are costly which limits their translation into clinical practice. Multi-colour extrusion fused deposition modelling (FDM) can be used to create 3D prostate cancer models of a quality comparable to more expensive techniques at a fraction of the cost. Three different 3D printing methods were used to create the same 3D prostate model: FDM, colour jet printing (CJP) and material jetting (MJ), with a calculated cost per model of USD 20, USD 200 and USD 250 respectively. When taking into account the cost, the FDM prostate models are the most preferred 3D printing method by surgeons. This method could be used to manufacture low-cost 3D printed models across other medical disciplines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32561811
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67082-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-67082-7
pmc: PMC7305153
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10004Références
Chen, M. Y. et al. Current applications of three-dimensional printing in urology. BJU international 125, 17–27, https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14928 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/bju.14928
pubmed: 31622020
Cacciamani, G. E. et al. Impact of Three-dimensional Printing in Urology: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. A Systematic Review by ESUT-YAUWP Group. European urology 76, 209–221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.044 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.044
pubmed: 31109814
Porpiglia, F. et al. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception. World journal of urology 36, 201–207, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2126-1 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2126-1
pubmed: 29127451
Wake, N. et al. Patient-specific 3D printed and augmented reality kidney and prostate cancer models: impact on patient education. 3D Printing in Medicine 5, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0041-3 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s41205-019-0041-3
pubmed: 30783869
pmcid: 6743040
Shin, T., Ukimura, O. & Gill, I. S. Three-dimensional Printed Model of Prostate Anatomy and Targeted Biopsy-proven Index Tumor to Facilitate Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy. European urology 69, 377–379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.024 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.024
pubmed: 26431913
Chandak, P. et al. Three-dimensional printing in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - an Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) Phase 2a study. BJU international 122, 360–361, https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14189 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/bju.14189
pubmed: 29509303
Vitali, J., Cheng, M. & Wagels, M. Utility and cost–effectiveness of 3D-printed materials for clinical use. Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine, https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2019-0015 (2019).
Awad, A., Gaisford, S. & Basit, A. W. in 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals (eds Abdul W. Basit & Simon Gaisford) 107-132 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).
Espalin, D., Ramirez, J. A., Medina, F. & Wicker, R. Multi-material, multi-technology FDM: exploring build process variations. Rapid Prototyping Journal 20, 236–244, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2012-0112 (2014).
doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2012-0112
Wu, H. H. et al. A system using patient-specific 3D-printed molds to spatially align in vivo MRI with ex vivo MRI and whole-mount histopathology for prostate cancer research. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 49, 270–279, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26189 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26189
pubmed: 30069968
Priester, A. et al. A system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed molds. American journal of clinical and experimental urology 2, 127–135 (2014).
pubmed: 25374914
pmcid: 4219304
Sun, Y. et al. Accuracy of a chairside fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical template for implant placement: An in vitro comparison with a light cured template. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 47, 1216–1221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.019 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.019
pubmed: 31109740
Bücking, T. M. et al. From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLOS ONE 12, e0178540, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178540 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178540
pubmed: 28562693
pmcid: 5451060
Petropolis, C., Kozan, D. & Sigurdson, L. Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23, 91–94, https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000912 (2015).
doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000912
Atalay, H. A. et al. Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Pelvicaliceal System Models on Residents’ Understanding of Pelvicaliceal System Anatomy Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy Surgery: A Pilot Study. J Endourol 30, 1132–1137, https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0307 (2016).
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0307
pubmed: 27506462
Chung, M. et al. On the optimization of low-cost FDM 3D printers for accurate replication of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. 3D Printing in Medicine 4, 2, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0023-2 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s41205-017-0023-2
pubmed: 29782613
pmcid: 5954792
Chen, M. Y., Skewes, J., Woodruff, M. A. & Rukin, N. J. Using bespoke 3D-printed models to improve patient understanding of an encrusted ureteric stent. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2051415819876514, https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415819876514 (2019).
Checcucci, E. et al. Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03613-0 (2019).