DNA damage repair pathway alterations in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and implications on systemic therapy.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ pharmacology
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Carcinogenesis
/ genetics
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ drug therapy
DNA Damage
/ drug effects
DNA Mutational Analysis
DNA Repair
/ drug effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Loss of Function Mutation
Male
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Retrospective Studies
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
genetics
immunology
oncology
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
accepted:
25
03
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Loss-of-function alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are associated with human tumorigenesis and may determine benefit from immune-oncology (I/O) agents as shown in colon cancer. However, biologic significance and relevance to I/O in metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) are unknown. Genomic data and treatment outcomes were retrospectively collected for patients with metastatic ccRCC. Tumor and germline DNA were subject to targeted next generation sequencing across >400 genes of interest, including 34 DDR genes. Patients were dichotomized according to underlying DDR gene alteration into (1) deleterious DDR gene alterations present (Del DDR); (2) wild-type (WT) and variants of unknown significance (VUS) DDR gene alterations present (WT/VUS DDR). Association between DDR status and therapeutic benefit was investigated separately for I/O and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Del DDR were detected in 43/229 patients (19%). The most frequently altered genes were Del DDR alterations are recurrent genomic events in patients with advanced RCC and were mostly clonal in this cohort. Loss-of-function events in these genes may affect outcome with I/O therapy in metastatic RCC, and these hypothesis-generating results deserve further study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Loss-of-function alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are associated with human tumorigenesis and may determine benefit from immune-oncology (I/O) agents as shown in colon cancer. However, biologic significance and relevance to I/O in metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) are unknown.
METHODS
Genomic data and treatment outcomes were retrospectively collected for patients with metastatic ccRCC. Tumor and germline DNA were subject to targeted next generation sequencing across >400 genes of interest, including 34 DDR genes. Patients were dichotomized according to underlying DDR gene alteration into (1) deleterious DDR gene alterations present (Del DDR); (2) wild-type (WT) and variants of unknown significance (VUS) DDR gene alterations present (WT/VUS DDR). Association between DDR status and therapeutic benefit was investigated separately for I/O and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.
RESULTS
Del DDR were detected in 43/229 patients (19%). The most frequently altered genes were
CONCLUSION
Del DDR alterations are recurrent genomic events in patients with advanced RCC and were mostly clonal in this cohort. Loss-of-function events in these genes may affect outcome with I/O therapy in metastatic RCC, and these hypothesis-generating results deserve further study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32571992
pii: jitc-2019-000230
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000230
pmc: PMC7311069
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
VEGFA protein, human
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MIC reports consulting/advisory role for Pfizer. C-HL reports consulting/advisory role for Exelixis and Eisai. DRF reports research support from Novartis and Seattle Genetics. TAC reports research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Eisai, An2H and Illumina. TAC holds a patent for the use of TMB to predict immunotherapy response. This is licensed to PGDx and MSKCC and TAC are entitled to receive royalties. TAC is a cofounder of Gritstone Oncology and holds equity. RJM reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Exelixis, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Incyte, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. MHV reports receiving commercial research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Genentech/Roche. Honoraria from Novartis. Travel/accommodation from Eisai, Novartis and Takeda. Consultant/advisory board member for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Calithera Biosciences, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Exelixis, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Natera, Novartis and Pfizer.
Références
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 19;9(4):4647-4660
pubmed: 29435132
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Apr 11;35(4):314-316
pubmed: 28398314
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Dec;15(12):760-70
pubmed: 26603901
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Cancer Discov. 2019 May;9(5):646-661
pubmed: 30777870
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Mol Cell. 2007 Dec 14;28(5):739-45
pubmed: 18082599
Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;78(22):6486-6496
pubmed: 30171052
Bioinformatics. 2015 May 15;31(10):1536-43
pubmed: 25583119
Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1931-9
pubmed: 22056247
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Aug;17(4):299-305.e1
pubmed: 31204211
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Sep 19;44(16):e131
pubmed: 27270079
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1814-23
pubmed: 26406150
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13
pubmed: 26406148
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D941-D947
pubmed: 30371878
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31
pubmed: 23964934
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283ra54
pubmed: 25877892
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):115-24
pubmed: 17215529
J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1430-7
pubmed: 25452452
Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;74(17):4853-4863
pubmed: 24970479
Nature. 2013 Jul 4;499(7456):43-9
pubmed: 23792563
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):354-366
pubmed: 28121507
Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):366-74
pubmed: 11357144
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1685-1694
pubmed: 29489427
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):415-21
pubmed: 23945592