Effect of computed tomography perfusion post-processing algorithms on optimal threshold selection for final infarct volume prediction.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Bayes Theorem
Blood Volume
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Contrast Media
Female
Humans
Iohexol
Ischemic Stroke
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Thrombectomy
Thrombolytic Therapy
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Bayesian
CT perfusion
fluid-attenuation inversion recovery MRI
ischemic stroke
singular value decomposition plus
Journal
The neuroradiology journal
ISSN: 2385-1996
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiol J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101295103
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
1
5
2021
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, eligibility for endovascular intervention is commonly determined through computed tomography perfusion (CTP) analysis by quantifying ischemic tissue using perfusion parameter thresholds. However, thresholds are not uniform across all analysis methods due to dependencies on patient demographics and computational algorithms. This study aimed to investigate optimal perfusion thresholds for quantifying infarct and penumbra volumes using two post-processing CTP algorithms: Vitrea Bayesian and singular value decomposition plus (SVD+). We utilized 107 AIS patients (67 non-intervention patients and 40 successful reperfusion of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (2b/3) patients). Infarct volumes were predicted for both post-processing algorithms through contralateral hemisphere comparisons using absolute time-to-peak (TTP) and relative regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) thresholds ranging from +2.8 seconds to +9.3 seconds and -0.23 to -0.56 respectively. Optimal thresholds were determined by minimizing differences between predicted CTP and 24-hour fluid-attenuation inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging infarct. Optimal thresholds were tested on 60 validation patients (30 intervention and 30 non-intervention) and compared using RAPID CTP software. Among the 67 non-intervention and 40 intervention patients, the following optimal thresholds were determined: intervention Bayesian: TTP = +4.8 seconds, rCBV = -0.29; intervention SVD+: TTP = +5.8 seconds, rCBV = -0.29; non-intervention Bayesian: TTP = +5.3 seconds, rCBV = -0.32; non-intervention SVD+: TTP = +6.3 seconds, rCBV = -0.26. When comparing SVD+ and Bayesian post-processing algorithms, optimal thresholds for TTP were significantly different for intervention and non-intervention patients. rCBV optimal thresholds were equal for intervention patients and significantly different for non-intervention patients. Comparison with commercially utilized software indicated similar performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32573337
doi: 10.1177/1971400920934122
pmc: PMC7416348
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Iohexol
4419T9MX03
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273-285Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001413
Pays : United States
Références
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Mar;39(3):536-546
pubmed: 29172990
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Dec;11(12):1257-1260
pubmed: 31118267
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Jul;31(7):1381-95
pubmed: 22410325
Neurology. 2000 Jul 25;55(2):265-9
pubmed: 10908902
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Jan;36(1):E5
pubmed: 24380482
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):16-21
pubmed: 23264523
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):932-938
pubmed: 28283606
Stroke. 2014 Apr;45(4):1024-8
pubmed: 24558095
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Jul;20(3):191-8
pubmed: 25152832
Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):979-85
pubmed: 16514093
Front Neurol. 2017 Oct 13;8:539
pubmed: 29081762
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;33(3):545-9
pubmed: 22194372
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):849-856
pubmed: 28486789
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jan;79(1):76-89
pubmed: 26476022
Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):616-620
pubmed: 30168180
Ann Neurol. 2017 Dec;82(6):995-1003
pubmed: 29205466
Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45 Suppl 1:S11-22
pubmed: 12598022
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):896-905
pubmed: 28946832
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;84(3):271-6
pubmed: 23178505
J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):324-33
pubmed: 17556166
J Neuroimaging. 2017 Nov;27(6):602-606
pubmed: 28414895
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):206-212
pubmed: 31948951
Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):e558-63
pubmed: 19745180
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):710-8
pubmed: 25430859
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 May 26;:
pubmed: 32457224