Knowledge and application of upper limb prediction models and attitude toward prognosis among physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the clinical stroke setting.
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Denmark
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Stroke
/ complications
Stroke Rehabilitation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Upper Extremity
/ physiopathology
Young Adult
Stroke
knowledge transfer
occupational therapy
physiotherapy
prediction
rehabilitation
upper limb
Journal
Topics in stroke rehabilitation
ISSN: 1945-5119
Titre abrégé: Top Stroke Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9439750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
28
7
2021
entrez:
26
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A substantial body of research on prediction models for upper limb (UL) function after stroke has emerged during recent years. Despite considerable evidence supporting the use of prediction models, their implementation into clinical practice has not been examined. To investigate whether physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) who evaluate and rehabilitate stroke patients know about and apply prediction models for the recovery of UL function. Furthermore, to examine their attitudes toward prognosis for UL function in clinical practice. The authors developed an online survey using REDCap®, specifically aimed to investigate this study's objectives. Physiotherapists and occupational therapists from Danish hospitals with acute stroke or rehabilitation wards were invited to participate. Data were analyzed using STATA 15.1. Of the 380 therapists invited, 58% responded to the survey. Among those, 35% reported that they knew of prediction models for UL function after stroke. More physiotherapists than occupational therapists were familiar with prediction models ( Results from this study indicate that prediction models for UL function after stroke are not yet a part of daily practice in Danish stroke rehabilitation. At the same time, knowledge of prognosis seems to be relevant for most therapists in their clinical work.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A substantial body of research on prediction models for upper limb (UL) function after stroke has emerged during recent years. Despite considerable evidence supporting the use of prediction models, their implementation into clinical practice has not been examined.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate whether physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) who evaluate and rehabilitate stroke patients know about and apply prediction models for the recovery of UL function. Furthermore, to examine their attitudes toward prognosis for UL function in clinical practice.
METHODS
The authors developed an online survey using REDCap®, specifically aimed to investigate this study's objectives. Physiotherapists and occupational therapists from Danish hospitals with acute stroke or rehabilitation wards were invited to participate. Data were analyzed using STATA 15.1.
RESULTS
Of the 380 therapists invited, 58% responded to the survey. Among those, 35% reported that they knew of prediction models for UL function after stroke. More physiotherapists than occupational therapists were familiar with prediction models (
CONCLUSIONS
Results from this study indicate that prediction models for UL function after stroke are not yet a part of daily practice in Danish stroke rehabilitation. At the same time, knowledge of prognosis seems to be relevant for most therapists in their clinical work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32583731
doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1783915
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM