Tetramerisation of the CRISPR ring nuclease Crn3/Csx3 facilitates cyclic oligoadenylate cleavage.
Archaeoglobus fulgidus
/ enzymology
CRISPR-Associated Proteins
/ metabolism
Catalysis
Catalytic Domain
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
Endonucleases
/ metabolism
Escherichia coli
/ metabolism
Kinetics
Methanosarcina
Models, Molecular
Oligonucleotides
/ chemistry
Protein Multimerization
RNA
/ metabolism
Ribonucleases
/ genetics
Second Messenger Systems
Signal Transduction
CARF domain
CRISPR
Csx3
archaeoglobus fulgidus
biochemistry
chemical biology
cooperative enzyme
cyclic tetra-adenylate
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2020
29 06 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
accepted:
28
06
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
30
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Type III CRISPR systems detect foreign RNA and activate the cyclase domain of the Cas10 subunit, generating cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules that act as a second messenger to signal infection, activating nucleases that degrade the nucleic acid of both invader and host. This can lead to dormancy or cell death; to avoid this, cells need a way to remove cOA from the cell once a viral infection has been defeated. Enzymes specialised for this task are known as ring nucleases, but are limited in their distribution. Here, we demonstrate that the widespread CRISPR associated protein Csx3, previously described as an RNA deadenylase, is a ring nuclease that rapidly degrades cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA Bacteria protect themselves from infections using a system called CRISPR-Cas, which helps the cells to detect and destroy invading threats. The type III CRISPR-Cas system, in particular, is one of the most widespread and efficient at killing viruses. When a bacterium is infected, the CRISPR-Cas system takes a fragment of the genetic material of the virus, and copies it into a molecule. These molecular ‘police mugshots’ are then loaded into a complex of Cas proteins that patrol the cell, looking for a match and destroying any virus that can be identified. Some Cas proteins also produce alarm signals, called cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs), which can trigger additional defences. However, this process can damage the genetic material of the bacterium, harming or even killing the cell. Enzymes known as ring nucleases can promptly degrade cOAs and turn off this defence system before it causes harm. However, ring nucleases have only been found in a few species to date; how most bacteria deal with cOA toxicity has remained unknown. Here, Athukoralage et al. set out to determine whether a widespread enzyme known as Csx3, which is often associated with type III CRISPR-Cas systems, could be an alternative off switch for cOA triggered defences. Initial ‘test tube’ experiments with purified Csx3 proteins confirmed that the enzyme could indeed break down cOAs. A careful dissection of Csx3’s molecular structure, using biochemical and biophysical techniques, revealed that it worked by ‘sandwiching’ a cOA molecule between two co-operating portions of the enzyme. As a final test, Csx3 was introduced into strains of bacteria genetically engineered to have a fully functional Type III CRISPR-Cas system. In these cells, Csx3 successfully turned off the Type III immune response. These results reveal a new way that bacteria avoid the toxic side effects of their own immune defences. Ultimately, this could pave the way for the development of anti-bacterial drugs that work by blocking Csx3 or similar proteins.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Bacteria protect themselves from infections using a system called CRISPR-Cas, which helps the cells to detect and destroy invading threats. The type III CRISPR-Cas system, in particular, is one of the most widespread and efficient at killing viruses. When a bacterium is infected, the CRISPR-Cas system takes a fragment of the genetic material of the virus, and copies it into a molecule. These molecular ‘police mugshots’ are then loaded into a complex of Cas proteins that patrol the cell, looking for a match and destroying any virus that can be identified. Some Cas proteins also produce alarm signals, called cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs), which can trigger additional defences. However, this process can damage the genetic material of the bacterium, harming or even killing the cell. Enzymes known as ring nucleases can promptly degrade cOAs and turn off this defence system before it causes harm. However, ring nucleases have only been found in a few species to date; how most bacteria deal with cOA toxicity has remained unknown. Here, Athukoralage et al. set out to determine whether a widespread enzyme known as Csx3, which is often associated with type III CRISPR-Cas systems, could be an alternative off switch for cOA triggered defences. Initial ‘test tube’ experiments with purified Csx3 proteins confirmed that the enzyme could indeed break down cOAs. A careful dissection of Csx3’s molecular structure, using biochemical and biophysical techniques, revealed that it worked by ‘sandwiching’ a cOA molecule between two co-operating portions of the enzyme. As a final test, Csx3 was introduced into strains of bacteria genetically engineered to have a fully functional Type III CRISPR-Cas system. In these cells, Csx3 successfully turned off the Type III immune response. These results reveal a new way that bacteria avoid the toxic side effects of their own immune defences. Ultimately, this could pave the way for the development of anti-bacterial drugs that work by blocking Csx3 or similar proteins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32597755
doi: 10.7554/eLife.57627
pii: 57627
pmc: PMC7371418
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
CRISPR-Associated Proteins
0
Oligonucleotides
0
RNA
63231-63-0
Endonucleases
EC 3.1.-
Ribonucleases
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/S000313/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund
ID : 204821/Z/16/Z
Pays : International
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/T004789/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Athukoralage et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JA, SM, SG, SG, TG, MW No competing interests declared
Références
RNA Biol. 2019 Apr;16(4):530-542
pubmed: 29911924
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012 Apr;68(Pt 4):431-40
pubmed: 22505263
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Apr;4(4):656-662
pubmed: 30692669
Cell. 2016 Feb 11;164(4):710-21
pubmed: 26853474
Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Sep 12;36(19):2514-23
pubmed: 27457616
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):605-609
pubmed: 28663439
Nature. 2017 Aug 31;548(7669):543-548
pubmed: 28722012
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Jun;9(6):467-77
pubmed: 21552286
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Oct 13;45(18):10740-10750
pubmed: 28977519
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012 Mar 15;519(2):131-43
pubmed: 22182754
Mol Cell. 2013 Oct 10;52(1):124-34
pubmed: 24119402
Cell. 2016 Jan 14;164(1-2):29-44
pubmed: 26771484
RNA Biol. 2019 Apr;16(4):449-460
pubmed: 29995577
Genes Dev. 2016 Feb 15;30(4):447-59
pubmed: 26848045
RNA. 2016 Feb;22(2):216-24
pubmed: 26647461
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011 Apr;67(Pt 4):355-67
pubmed: 21460454
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006 Jan;62(Pt 1):72-82
pubmed: 16369096
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Sep 26;47(17):9259-9270
pubmed: 31392987
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):31-5
pubmed: 3540957
RNA. 2012 Apr;18(4):661-72
pubmed: 22345129
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010 Jan;66(Pt 1):12-21
pubmed: 20057044
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7791):572-575
pubmed: 31942067
Nat Commun. 2020 Mar 27;11(1):1596
pubmed: 32221291
RNA. 2016 Mar;22(3):318-29
pubmed: 26763118
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Feb 28;45(4):1983-1993
pubmed: 27986854
Mol Cell. 2016 Apr 21;62(2):295-306
pubmed: 27105119
J Am Chem Soc. 2016 Nov 16;138(45):15035-15045
pubmed: 27740761
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2812-2825
pubmed: 28985291
Genes Dev. 2016 Feb 15;30(4):460-70
pubmed: 26848046
IUCrJ. 2014 May 30;1(Pt 4):213-20
pubmed: 25075342
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2014 Oct;70(Pt 10):2652-66
pubmed: 25286849
Elife. 2020 Apr 27;9:
pubmed: 32338598
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jun 19;48(11):6149-6156
pubmed: 32347937
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 5;115(23):E5307-E5316
pubmed: 29784811
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):277-280
pubmed: 30232454
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017 Mar 1;73(Pt 3):223-233
pubmed: 28291757
Elife. 2018 Jul 02;7:
pubmed: 29963983
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 24;11(1):500
pubmed: 31980625
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Dec;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2126-32
pubmed: 15572765
Mol Microbiol. 2013 Mar;87(5):1088-99
pubmed: 23320564
Front Genet. 2014 Apr 30;5:102
pubmed: 24817877
Q Rev Biophys. 2011 Feb;44(1):1-93
pubmed: 20854710
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Nov;1(6):e60
pubmed: 16292354
J Mol Biol. 2019 Jul 12;431(15):2894-2899
pubmed: 31071326
Elife. 2020 Jun 29;9:
pubmed: 32597755
Methods Enzymol. 2019;616:191-218
pubmed: 30691643
Mol Cell. 2019 Sep 5;75(5):944-956.e6
pubmed: 31326273
J Cell Biol. 2010 May 31;189(5):777-82
pubmed: 20513764
RNA Biol. 2015;12(7):749-60
pubmed: 26106927
RNA Biol. 2016;13(2):254-7
pubmed: 26727591
Structure. 2015 Apr 7;23(4):782-90
pubmed: 25773141