Evaluation of the VISAGE Basic Tool for Appearance and Ancestry Prediction Using PowerSeq Chemistry on the MiSeq FGx System.
DNA Fingerprinting
/ methods
Eye Color
/ genetics
Forensic Genetics
/ methods
Genetic Markers
/ genetics
Genotype
Hair Color
/ genetics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
/ genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ methods
Skin Pigmentation
/ genetics
Software
BGA
DNA phenotyping
EVC prediction
HIrisPlex-S
PowerSeq
VISAGE
ancestry
appearance
forensic DNA phenotyping
phenotype prediction
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 06 2020
26 06 2020
Historique:
received:
11
05
2020
revised:
09
06
2020
accepted:
11
06
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
13
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study of DNA to predict externally visible characteristics (EVCs) and the biogeographical ancestry (BGA) from unknown samples is gaining relevance in forensic genetics. Technical developments in Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) enable the simultaneous analysis of hundreds of DNA markers, which improves successful Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP). The EU-funded VISAGE (VISible Attributes through GEnomics) Consortium has developed various targeted MPS-based lab tools to apply FDP in routine forensic analyses. Here, we present an evaluation of the VISAGE Basic tool for appearance and ancestry prediction based on PowerSeq chemistry (Promega) on a MiSeq FGx System (Illumina). The panel consists of 153 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that provide information about EVCs (41 SNPs for eye, hair and skin color from HIrisPlex-S) and continental BGA (115 SNPs; three overlap with the EVCs SNP set). The assay was evaluated for sensitivity, repeatability and genotyping concordance, as well as its performance with casework-type samples. This targeted MPS assay provided complete genotypes at all 153 SNPs down to 125 pg of input DNA and 99.67% correct genotypes at 50 pg. It was robust in terms of repeatability and concordance and provided useful results with casework-type samples. The results suggest that this MPS assay is a useful tool for basic appearance and ancestry prediction in forensic genetics for users interested in applying PowerSeq chemistry and MiSeq for this purpose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32604780
pii: genes11060708
doi: 10.3390/genes11060708
pmc: PMC7349024
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : 3UM1HG008901-03S1
Pays : United States
Références
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:135-148
pubmed: 28938154
Nat Genet. 2018 May;50(5):652-656
pubmed: 29662168
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):29-34
pubmed: 19083725
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:123-135
pubmed: 29753263
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Sep;42:260-267
pubmed: 31404905
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jun 20;48:102336
pubmed: 32619960
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Sep;42:252-259
pubmed: 31400656
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Mar;45:102213
pubmed: 31835179
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Nov;133(6):1667-1679
pubmed: 30976986
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 May;7(3):359-66
pubmed: 23537756
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1-11.10.33
pubmed: 25431634
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:52-70
pubmed: 28171784
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jul;17:110-121
pubmed: 25955683
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov;43:102152
pubmed: 31518964
Int J Legal Med. 2019 May;133(3):677-688
pubmed: 30519731
Electrophoresis. 2017 Apr;38(8):1163-1174
pubmed: 28078776
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e31-e34
pubmed: 29092934
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jan;7(1):98-115
pubmed: 22917817
Hum Genet. 2017 Jul;136(7):847-863
pubmed: 28500464
Electrophoresis. 2016 Oct;37(21):2832-2840
pubmed: 27605155
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:241-251
pubmed: 30268682
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:49-65
pubmed: 26013312
BMC Genet. 2009 Oct 27;10:69
pubmed: 19860882
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Electrophoresis. 2016 Oct;37(21):2822-2831
pubmed: 27709635
Int J Legal Med. 2016 Jul;130(4):905-914
pubmed: 26932869
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Mar;33:38-47
pubmed: 29190509
Genomics. 2013 Oct;102(4):270-7
pubmed: 23743231
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Jun;5(3):170-80
pubmed: 20457092
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):201-206
pubmed: 27654912
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Dec;1(3-4):273-80
pubmed: 19083773
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:100-17
pubmed: 25866376
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Sep;42:8-13
pubmed: 31207428
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:178-189
pubmed: 27208666
Croat Med J. 2009 Jun;50(3):207-17
pubmed: 19480017
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 May;10:23-32
pubmed: 24508742
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Dec 23;51-52(51-52):873-880
pubmed: 31941575
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:33-48
pubmed: 25716572